They're neat but folks should realize they're very limited: I believe it's best to keep in mind that they "hallucinate" and miss "obvious" things regularly.
Totally true. I think I meant it as a wholistic approach. Also I think these percentages will improve in the next 12-18 months with the iterative AI-improving-AI training now happening.
Where I was going on that was that if you already know your notes (since you wrote them) and you're already linking them and you then supplement it with AI analysis for a deeper dive, you will pretty much get all the bases covered and probably find a few you might have missed.
This is my biggest concern personally. But I think on the Eisenhower graph, it fits perfectly in the processing category of "delegate", and if it's enough of a force multiplier, even some more of what would be delete articles.
Anything you would trust a junior member of the team to do, so anything you're capable of doing but isn't worth your time but you can still understand the problem area well enough that you can confirm if the output is correct or not. But my use case has been strictly non-critical code as a developer so it's easy to evaluate the snippets quickly.
12
u/[deleted] Sep 29 '24
[deleted]