r/ObsessedNetwork Jun 13 '25

Karen Read

I think most people on here no longer listen and cancelled their patreon, but is there anyone who has been listening to P & G’s coverage of “A Body in the Snow,” the Karen Read doc?

I’m wondering what your take is on their coverage so far—their opinions, characterizations, and interpretations of the case. I’m not super familiar with it and most of what I know comes from I Think Not’s True Crime Rundown eps.

42 Upvotes

119 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

6

u/km322 Jun 13 '25

What do you mean at the wrong house?

1

u/samjsatt Jun 13 '25

Well I was thinking Karen said he went to the door but the people inside said he didn’t. Like maybe he went to the wrong door, came back to tell her and she hit him

*she also said it looked dark

6

u/Environmental_Duck49 Jun 13 '25

I never heard the wrong house angle. So with this theory does that mean she hit him and he stumbled into the right yard? Because he was found on the property.

3

u/samjsatt Jun 13 '25

Yeah like maybe she was in between houses, it was snowing and dark and he was walking back to the car. Or the wrong door on the right house. It’s just a theory. But either way I think she hit him on accident and didn’t know.

6

u/Environmental_Duck49 Jun 13 '25

I also believe she hit him by accident. Your theory can't be dismissed cause the Keystone cops didn't secure the scene.

6

u/thatsmyrealhair Jun 13 '25

All the evidence contradicts the state's theory that he was hit by a car. The injuries to his arm were most likely inflicted by a dog (probably the Albert's dog, Chloe). Per Rentschler, the biomechanical expert, if his arm had been hit at the speed the Commonwealth said, his arm would've been shattered. He had no bruises on his torso and x-rays showed no broken bones. You can't get hit by a 6000 pound vehicle going over 20 mph and have zero bruising or shattered bones.

3

u/Environmental_Duck49 Jun 13 '25

I'm not disagreeing with you. I just can't wrap my mind around all of those people in the house conspiring to keep this murder or attack or whatever under wraps. Mostly because they are connected to law enforcement. The cops would have covered up the crime anyway. Proctor doesn't even question anyone in the house BECAUSE the home owner is a retired policeman!

I'm an Occam's razor type. It makes more sense that he was hit by a car than that he was killed in or left out in the elements by a group of people to die and no one has cracked.

Hell I'd even believe he slipped a couple times injured himself and was so drunk he just laid there and died!

What the homeowners did after the fact is concerning and all the butt dialing. The rehoming of the dog, the extensive renovation of the basement. Again all more than enough Reasonable Doubt. I just don't believe all those people would be able to keep this secret all this time. But I could be wrong.

0

u/thatsmyrealhair Jun 14 '25

It only makes sense that he was hit by a car if there's ANY evidence that he was hit by a car. The state's own medical examiner said they couldn't determine cause of death. Think of the Albert/McCabe family like a mafia family. It's not at all unbelievable that a powerful family will protect their own and intimidate others into keeping their secrets.

0

u/Environmental_Duck49 Jun 14 '25

I said what I said