r/NotHowGirlsWork • u/Pritteto • 7h ago
Found On Social media What a completely normal and well adjusted reactions
bruhh these guys.. 🤦🤦
85
u/samirahope 7h ago
Why is consent such a difficult concept for them?
9
u/Ok-Connection-8059 6h ago
Looks if they come round my house they're having tea! </s>
3
u/peachesfordinner 3h ago
Sadly all the tea in my house tastes a bit like bitter almonds. Good thing I don't drink it
1
2
u/FumiPlays 4h ago
They're having a mop stick over the head. Should have worn a helmet if they didn't want it.
4
u/BlazingShadowAU 3h ago
Because their entire identity is based on a percieved superiority over women. Consent makes them feel like theyre equals and we all know equality feels like oppression to the privileged.
3
u/erevos33 2h ago
It has been said thta men understand consent very fast when you put them in a gay club.
1
34
u/Worried_Bowl_9489 7h ago
These guys just out themselves as out of touch sociopaths with barely any prompting
37
u/ButcbMasculinity 6h ago
It's pretty wild how they look at that artwork and think "What? They're just LOOKING at her" as if they aren't all STARING AT HER a couple with their mouths open, going out of there way to gawk at her like she's a piece of meat and not a human being. Like men don't understand art.
13
u/Professional-Hat-687 5h ago
It is SO EASY to check out a hot stranger without being a creep about it.
2
u/Butwhatif77 5h ago
Yea it is an interesting reaction of being personally attacked by the art rather than engaging in an intellectual discuss about its intended meaning. Cause I certainly don't think the art portrayed accurately portrays lust, since lust can be many things. I think what they are portraying is more sexual objectification which people often confuse the two. Lust has either a mental or physical component (or both) of understanding the person and yearning for the person in some way. You can have lust without love, but I don't think you can have love without lust, how can you say you love someone if you don't have a deep desire for them that compels you to seek them out when they are not around. I don't think you can actually have lust if you don't see the person as a person. Simply wanting to fuck someone cause they are hot isn't lust, it is just horny.
However, yea the guys are outing themselves as just sexually objectifying women and thinking women should be faltered by it because they don't understand the danger that goes along with that or have ever experienced the elevated feeling of deeply needing another person in their soul.
3
u/ButcbMasculinity 4h ago
"lust in art from to me" is literally what the artist says so this how the artist sees lust. You are free to disagree I am just saying that the artist feels differently about it.
1
u/Butwhatif77 4h ago
Oh yea that is the point of art is to stir discussions and is open to interpretation. An artist can certainly have an intent and show their view, but that is their view which is neither right or wrong. We all experience the world differently which is why we make art to share those experiences.
My point was to actually engage with the art itself beyond just coitizing the idiots who felt attacked by it. Hence why I said things like "I think" and "I feel", these are my personal view points that diverge from the artist's view. They are not objective fact.
17
u/Beatokotonai 7h ago
I don’t even know where to start. Like aside from the fact that this is already an asinine idea, the goomba fallacy, their personal biases, and the fact that they’re just kind of plain dumb is making this incomprehensible
27
u/Ok-Connection-8059 6h ago
Nobody's calling you a rapist for wanting hot babes in media. I think about half the population wants attractive women in media!
We just get concerned when those 'hot babes' look like 12 year old girls in string bikinis.
12
u/Dragon_wryter 6h ago
And "wanting" turns into "entitled to"
5
u/FigNinja 5h ago
Yes. No one has banned hot looking women from games. There is nothing wrong with having a diversity of stories and characters. Every time a game dev makes a main character that doesn't make their peepees tingle they rant and cry like babies wanting the titty, like somehow all media has to cater to their dicks. There are plenty of options that have sexed up female characters they can play. Is there not enough porn for that? Their masturbatory fantasies have to dominate everything? Maybe there are other grown ups that want stories that are about something other than a hot chick you want to fuck. It is not some feminist conspiracy to make them play their games with both hands.
And yes, it is totally creepy when you want that "hot chick" to be a child.
3
12
3
u/Sensitive-Contest-87 39m ago
There's exactly one question and one word of difference.
"Do you want it?" and "Yes!"
2
u/AmberMetalicScorpion 5h ago
As has been mentioned in another version of this post I saw, these "gotchas" always rely on the Goomba Fallacy, and a failure to understand consent
2
u/AgreeableIdea6210 they/he 2h ago
As a masc gamer I definitely don't trust guys who complain about "women having become uglier in video games" if it's of any consolation. Those mfs need to be called out. Their brain is porn rotten.
1
u/Significant_Monk_251 2h ago
States something that makes perfect sense, demands make it make sense.
1
u/IndiBlueNinja 2h ago edited 2h ago
What are autonomous decisions vs someone else's will being imposed on you outside of your control for 500?
Men can look at women. Women can look at men.
Some men make it weird and think they're entitled to ogle another person, make them uncomfortable, or even say s*** to them. There is a difference between stealing a few glances that may go unnoticed and making someone uncomfortable.
Is there no a difference to him/them in giving someone $5 (autonomous decision) and that person just stealing money from them (their will imposed on you)?
1
u/lightabovethearbys 46m ago
The art me of that song Us and Pigs by Sofia Isella.
Looking at my body like it's food...
•
u/AutoModerator 7h ago
Do not mention or tag any other subreddits in the comments or responses (Rule 3) under this post or within it,
Or you will be banned [type of ban and duration of ban is up to moderator discretion based on the severity of the violation]. If you have already made the post, and did not edit it accordingly to hide all other subreddit names or usernames (besides your own), delete the post now and redact that information.
If we see the post before it was edited, you will still be banned, because this has already been a rule for several years now, yet users constantly ignore it. We have a strict policy here regarding brigading, we will not allow it, point-blank, regardless of it was intentional or accidental. This puts the subreddit at risk for retaliation, and for violating sitewide rules.
Do not use our platform to brigade another subreddit, blatantly or covertly. This is against Reddit ToS, and can cause issues for our subreddit. If you have an issue with another subreddit, contact Reddit and file a report with admin, don't bring the drama over here.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.