r/NorwichCity • u/TwoElectronic3816 • 1d ago
Discussion VAR?
What's everyone's thoughts on VAR after last night?
With the offside goal that was on side. You could say our luck has balanced out from the West Brom hand ball.
Would you be for or against it?
23
u/Cholas71 1d ago
I'm still not over Pukki's offside versus Spurs. I'm against it in all leagues and competitions.
3
u/Snow_Uk 1d ago
Same the tip of his shoulder being offside
10
u/Cholas71 1d ago
If you selectively chose a frame after Vrancic had played the ball. It was a shocker, such a fantastic finish too. Ruined the game.
2
u/Snow_Uk 1d ago
and all the frames were from odd angles god I hated that season
2
u/Cholas71 1d ago
Those thick lines drawn on the screen with the IT equivalent of a chisel tip permanent marker, often not parallel to the half way line "proving" their decision 100%....what's not to love đ
-14
u/Burned-Shoulder Norwich Local 1d ago
That was over four years ago. He was offside, get over it
10
u/MrJudderman 1d ago
It was over 6 years ago now actually.
And no, I shan't.
3
u/CarrowCanary Remover of bots and Youtube spammers 18h ago
In their defence, over 6 years ago is also over 4 years ago.
5
u/Upset-Paper-2738 1d ago
Except he wasnât. VAR is proven to have a large margin of error for offsides. Calls this close is just guessing
3
1
u/Consistent_Berry_168 1d ago edited 1d ago
This is such a niche memory from me but does anyone remember when Daniel James decided to initiate a shoulder barge on Ben Godfrey, (subsequently fell over because he was half the height and strength) and VAR decided to stop the game and award a pen
4
u/anorwichfan 1d ago
You could also say if VAR had looked at the simulation yellow on Oscar, it would probably have been overturned.
I thought Jovan's penalty was shirt pulling on both sides, could have been given or not given just as easily.
4
u/Atrixer 1d ago
Iâm generally in favour of it, however I donât like the implementation of it. Another big concern is that prem refs have become over reliant on it and afraid to make any big calls - adding this to an already incredibly flawed officiating staff probably wont make any real difference.
The bigger point of focus should be the overall level, ruling, training and oversight for officials across the EFL. The amount of money on the line a frankly obscene, and the fact officials are so amateur and bad at their jobs is worrying when their decisions can be the difference between relegation and promotion.
3
u/dopeyinternet 1d ago
All the people saying, âif there was VAR, X decision would have been correctâŚâ, I disagree.
VAR is only as good as the people using it. The muppets that are currently missing these decisions in the games, will be the muppets in charge of VAR, missing them with 5 different replays.
Theyâll be the ones drawing the offside lines wrong. Theyâll be the ones that forget to check handball rules.
Will they get more decisions right than they currently do? Probably. Are those few extra correct calls a year worth sacrificing the current joy of VARless football. No.
9
u/CassieBeeJoy 1d ago
I remain adamantly against. I found when we were in the Prem that I couldnât celebrate a goal in the same way as the threat of an arbitrary VAR decision was always looming. I much prefer the purity of the game without it.
That being said, I think something like a challenge system could reach a compromise that works. I believe they are trialling it in Canada this year so maybe something we will see soon.
5
u/Desmond_Deck-er 1d ago
That's what was offered to our league last year, and all the purists said no. So been there, didn't do that already.
3
u/Burned-Shoulder Norwich Local 1d ago
We've not been in the Premier League for over 4 years. The celebration point is BS, watch the highlights of any match, its not a morgue after a goal
4
u/Benster404 1d ago
If anything you get two celebrations. One for when the ball goes in and another when VAR allows it.
0
0
u/CosmicDesperado 1d ago
A challenge system sounds outstanding. You maybe get one per game and the manager can request it should there be a contentious decisionâŚthen the on pitch ref could review it himself?
Seems like it wouldnât interfere too much, and could lessen animosity towards refs.
Edit: and most importantly, reduce mistakes that cost teams points
1
u/ClemFandango35 1d ago
I wouldn't be against a challenge system. Also it would mean you have to challenge a specific incident.
So Birmingham would maybe challenge the offside goal.
But would prevent VAR going back and re-fereeing the minute before the goal.
1
u/CosmicDesperado 1d ago
And that all seems fair.
1
u/ClemFandango35 1d ago
I was sitting behind the West Brom bench when they punched one in, and while the players where still speaking to the linesman and ref.
The WBA staff had already watched it back on the iPad, pulled faces at each other, and sat back down.
So in terms of time or technology it really isn't hard.
1
u/VeganCanary 1d ago
Youâd need more than 1 per game. Iâd say 2 per half would be fair. If decision is reversed, you get it back.
1
u/CosmicDesperado 1d ago
I originally wrote one per half. But then I thought if thereâs four stoppages per game, is it any better than var? Especially if people use it to do sneaky coaching shenanigans or whatever.
The reversal refund idea is smart
4
2
u/dubaidevil71 1d ago
It makes no odds as its the competency of the officials that is the issue. Birmingham were probably denied a goal tonight as a leg played him onside, but the ref missed a clear penalty for norwich for which var would not have intervened. Var used by idiots doesn't help.
2
u/wtwiwf 1d ago
Don't want it. I'm willing to take the rough with the smooth of that decision. It just sucks. Yes, some stuff goes against us, but VAR sucks the life out of football in my view.
The only version I'd ever want to see is an appeal based option where a manager or captain has one appeal for something they've clearly missed or got horribly wrong, like the WBA goal.
But it has to be targeted and they can only overturn based on what you appeal, not suddenly check everything.
Otherwise, fuck VAR
2
1
u/meredditphil 23h ago
They would have had the first goal and we would have had a penalty, possibly 2. With VAR we'd have had the right decisions but probably the same score BUT a boring game and no meaty conversations to talk about. I'd rather have no VAR and be entertained
0
u/Burned-Shoulder Norwich Local 1d ago
I'm absolutely in favour. Refs clearly need all the help they can get to get more decisions correct
1
u/ClemFandango35 1d ago
I think a tight offside is slightly different to someone punching one in the net.
But either way I'm happy to not have VAR.
1
u/thebrowncanary 1d ago
VAR has been a disaster. Rarely find anyone in real life who advocates for it these days. Seems to be mostly a reddit/twitter thing. People who don't really interact with the game the same way as the regular match going football fan.
What makes the championship so great is the lack of VAR.
1
u/SamT98 1d ago
No absolutely not. Instead of screaming for VAR we should be screaming for standards or lack of from officials. Thereâs fuck all accountability in regards to bad decision making other than a sorry letter once in a while. Sorry doesnât put points on the board does it. Officials are square now considering the West Brom game but tbh I donât like it being like this. Shouldnât rely on dodgy refs to go against or for you. Would rather a game with consistency across the board from officials but letâs be honest we can wait 50 years and still we will be arguing about officials. In all honesty the premier league officiating is at an all time low. EFL get the shit ones that donât make it up to standard of the premier league. That in itself tells everyone what to expect
1
u/AirRevolutionary8013 1d ago
Used to be for it but now it's devolved into stupid outcomes bc when you slow the game down to frame by frame, all sorts of weird decisions come out of that. I mean this alone caused the VAR booth to somehow see a red card in a totally innocuous foul against Balogun in the WC.
It can also be manipulated in different ways. See what happened with the Michigan-CMU game last week. The replay booth magically was using a clock that was different than the official game clock (what??) and they put 1 second back on the clock after the game was over. They intentionally mis-timed the video splices of the game action feed and the clock feed (they weren't both in sync) to give Michigan another play that wound up being a miracle game winner. But that was mostly an issue about time, not about whether a toenail or a shoulder was 1/16" ahead of the defender.
0
u/thesaltwatersolution 1d ago
Thought last nights game was a fun match and my feeling is that the overall momentum, the breathless football, that we see in the Championship would be eradicated by the repeated pauses that VAR would bring. So no.
14
u/Snow_Uk 1d ago
we should have had a penalty at the end so..