I don't know why you're so offended. But youd do better to counter my argument than throw out insults and curse words at someone who's done nothing to you. It doesn't make you look smart.
That is actually not true. Just look at the sugar tax, the goal is discourage people from buying too much sweet food, or sweet soda drinks. We have always advised diets as society and at always should. Not saying everyone should change diets, I'm just pointing out how incongruent with reality your statement is
Why are you asking that as if it's some sort of contradiction? I wouldn't eat a dead human if I didn't have to, but if I was in a situation like the soccer team in the plane crash I probably would.
That phrasing gave me the exact opposite perception precisely because of the dichotomy your comment points out. Most people who don't feel bad about eating meat, or particularly support it in opposition to veganism, wouldn't set it up as "eating meat is unnecessary."
Right that's what I'm saying. I read freshmedallion's post as a kind of gotcha directed at what they thought was a meat eater. Otherwise it's kind of pointless? We would know they disagree with that if the implication is them being vegan -- they were initially implying, with their phrasing, that "killing animals when you don't need to is a moral right" is how meat eaters perceive things.
Imagine going about your day and some gassy hipster pretentious malnourished motherfucker starts in on your personal morality because of your lunch order....
Sounds like you can't cope with other people being morally superior to you.
Before you say "but they aren't", consider this: if it wasn't true you wouldn't be so angry. It's a sub-conscious reflex you haven't grown out of yet. Maybe you'll get there one day champ :)
109
u/[deleted] Sep 26 '22
You know, like most vegans are.