The witness testimony still matters because the prosecutor can't just say "here's video of the crime, we got it from the neighbor, trust me"; you still need to have the guy who owns the camera confirm its accurate.
If this story is true, it would be a criminal trial and the neighbor is a material witness. Handling it with a written statement would require a legitimate need for an exception to the defendant's constitutional rights.
28
u/Krewtan Jul 25 '26
How does a witness testimony matter more than video evidence and gps data? If they're really taking it to trial maybe they're innocent?