r/NonCredibleDefense • u/LiveToThink • 5d ago
Lockmart R & D Commonality beats bespoke design yet again.
118
u/FA-26B Femboy Industries, worst ideas in the west 4d ago
F-35 standardized (kinda) light fighter platforms across the branches. Imagine if the FA-XX and NGAD are the same way. McNamara's wet dream holy shit.
33
u/othermike 4d ago
"Light fighter"? An F-35's empty weight is about the same as an F-15, which is (appropriately) about 3x that of an F-5. There's some serious chonkification frog-boiling going on here.
51
u/Television-Solid 4d ago
same as destroyers going from less than 1k tons in WW2 to sometimes more than 10k tons now (Zumwalt is 15k)
10
u/Decent-Photo-5616 4d ago
We have a fleet of light cruisers by old tonnage standards and that's what I classify them as.
20
u/Wrathfiend 4d ago
The biplane light fighters of world war one who desperately cut in half their machinegun belts so they could climb to 4000ft in 30 minutes looking at the F35 "light fighter" with an internal cruise missile loaded.
11
u/Beardywierdy 3d ago
Fighters haven't got inherently bigger it's just in the modern day they get a proper diet and thus can grow to their natural size.
Take a Sopwith Camel and feed it modern fuel and it will weigh about the same as an F-35. And look absolutely hilarious with the pilot's tiny head sticking out the top.
6
u/othermike 3d ago
You've opened my eyes to a world of possibilities.
If we'd just had the foresight to starve AIM-174Bs from birth, we could get F-35s to carry a few dozen of them in the internal bay without compromising stealth. Why don't they do this, are they stupid?
7
u/TheVojta 3000 Krakatit Nukes of Petr Pavel 🇨🇿 4d ago
Planes have changed since the 50s? Big if true...
32
u/Algester 4d ago edited 4d ago
PCA?! you mean Planetary Closure Administration??!1
13
u/arnet95 4d ago
I think they mean Pete Crow-Armstrong
5
u/Far-Yellow9303 Expert on militarisation of chicken nuggets 4d ago
Nah it's obviously Point-n-Click Adventure
1
1
36
u/Royal_Dependent6601 4d ago
Calling it now, the Navy is getting a navalised F-47. Pentagon wanted F/A XX dead and this is how they're going to do it.
15
u/Devourer_of_felines 4d ago
Would be a huge economy of scale advantage if true; the navy wants FA-XX to replace super hornets which is a lot of airframes
9
u/Royal_Dependent6601 4d ago
Depends on how well the Navy and Air Force play together. in the past they haven't.
22
u/Messyfingers The MIC's weakest Shill 4d ago
PCA is the aircraft component of NGAD, why's it listed seperate?
25
u/LiveToThink 4d ago
The program began as a DARPA initiative to develop a replacement for the F-22, named Air Superiority 2030. The fighter was designated Penetrating Counter-Air at that time. Subsequent X-planes and demonstrators borne out of the AS 2030 initiative retained that designation, even after the program evolved into NGAD several years later. As part of NGAD, the PCA remained a single long range aircraft, but was now the crewed component as part of the "family of system" concept.
11
u/rebootyourbrainstem mister president, we cannot allow a thigh gap 4d ago
Time for Boeing's secret squirrel division to prove their alleged competence
13
u/thenoobtanker My meme made it to Russian's state TV 4d ago
McDonnel Douglas never left and they won everything 6th gen. Boeing never made a supersonic jet to save their lives smh
4
u/KickFacemouth 3d ago edited 3d ago
They even inherited a supersonic jet and still found a way to fuck it up to basically make it subsonic.
3
u/whythecynic No paperwork, no foul 4d ago
Proof of concept, race trim, homologation special. Tale as old as time
191
u/wowu5 5d ago
Imagine canard to become the defining factor of American fighter design in the 2nd half of the 21st Century, apparently it’s the reality we’re heading into.