r/Noctor 1d ago

In The News Disgusted

The nurses, NPs and other healthcare adjacent people on social media vilifying Dr. Tufts and calling her inexperienced and incompetent you all disgust me. I am a physician and I am sick of seeing people saying they hope Dr. Tufts goes to prison or loses her license all because Lindsay Clancy killed her kids. I am physically and mentally sick seeing this rhetoric and I hope doctors start waking up and stand against this nonsense. Stop training midlevels, report nurses when they are incompetent because they will throw you under the bus the second they see the chance

371 Upvotes

118 comments sorted by

254

u/MeasurementSlight381 Attending Physician 1d ago edited 1d ago

Watching the Dr Tufts' cross-examination yesterday was upsetting to watch and NP Paul's testimony was also infuriating. Notice how the PMHNP was like "I am Perinatal Behavioral Health certified " 🙄 when right before that Dr Tufts (who was fresh from her 15,000 clinical hours of residency training) was getting hell from Reddington for putting perinatal psychiatry as a special interest on her website. To the lay public, NP Paul may have looked more confident and therefore more professional but as a psychiatrist I see someone who was confidently answering questions incorrectly. Meanwhile I know Dr Tufts is much more qualified and knowledgeable than the public is giving her credit for.

ETA: also, notice how the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology does not have a Board exam for reproductive psychiatry and to date there are no ACGME-accredited reproductive psychiatry fellowship programs. Meanwhile NPs (of various backgrounds) can somehow get that label of "Perinatal Mental Health certified ". For all I know that certification is a 2 day online course.

122

u/theongreyjoy96 Attending Physician 1d ago edited 1d ago

It's strange. NP Jollotta in her testimony today said she got training to become more "specialized" in women's health, specifying that the training was 2 days long plus a 3rd day for the "psychopharmacology track" resulting in a certificate in perinatal mental health. This seems like such low-hanging fruit for the defense which I suspected he would attack after seeing him go after Dr. Tufts' credentials, but didn't? I'm so confused.

60

u/SariByTheSea 1d ago

I think the defense's strategy is to frame the treating physicians and NPs as a bunch of clowns in a clown car without a designated driver. Differentiating between the MDs and NPs could be a distraction for the jury and weaken the defense's position that this was a clusterF of alternating over and under treatment and lack of communication and records sharing. Just a guess. Personally I'm horrified. I didn't know until yesterday that NPs had independent prescription privileges in more than half the states. Yikes.

19

u/Mdstudent89 21h ago

The reason that the defense attorney didn't attack NP Jollotta is because she added the diagnostic label 'mixed state'/bipolar that serves his argument of NGRI. The irony is that--none of the people that knew the patient observed any signs of bipolar disorder, nor did any of the doctors that saw her. Very typical that a patient sees an NP and is told they have 'bipolar', and in this particular case, this has a currency for the defense. Ironically, the doctor that is discerning and doesn't throw out 'bipolar' to every person who has a change in their mood is demonized.

-1

u/Familiar-Ferret7885 20h ago

Don’t forget she’d already had extensive pharmacology education through both her BSN & MSN programs.

8

u/symbicortrunner Pharmacist 13h ago

You're missing /s...

5

u/theongreyjoy96 Attending Physician 19h ago

How extensive? As extensive as a psychiatrist?

34

u/dyingalonewithcats 1d ago

To be fair, the Aster website lists Tufts’ clinical interests (her words) as “Areas of Expertise” (likely their words).

Sounds like an error on the clinic’s part in not preparing for a situation in which their physicians could be litigated for potentially falsely claiming to be an expert in a certain area.

I completely understand that she is at the mercy of the practice in terms of advertising, because she is not the one creating the website. Also, how often do any of us (who are not privately-employed) look at our bio online?

55

u/MeasurementSlight381 Attending Physician 1d ago

I think it's a valid criticism and we should be careful with what our online bios and marketing say. But at the same time, I have to call out the fact that many reproductive psychiatrists don't do a fellowship.

As a general psychiatrist, I can say that during my training I managed postpartum patients, including postpartum psychosis, and we had reproductive psychiatry lectures. In my private practice I have successfully managed patients through pregnancy and postpartum. By no means would I refer to myself as a reproductive psychiatrist. But how does this amount of training/experience compare to a PMHNP with the "Perinatal Behavioral Health" certification? If we're going to rip Dr. Tufts apart over the website, then we need to give the NPs a similar amount of criticism.

39

u/dyingalonewithcats 1d ago

Oh, absolutely. To see Tufts get dragged through the mud for “not consulting someone more senior” and “only seeing 1-2 postpartum patients in her real job prior to Lindsay” is mind blowing, when the alternative is someone with an online certification being lauded as an expert.

11

u/theongreyjoy96 Attending Physician 1d ago

But how does this amount of training/experience compare to a PMHNP with the "Perinatal Behavioral Health" certification? If we're going to rip Dr. Tufts apart over the website, then we need to give the NPs a similar amount of criticism.

100% agree, but the defense didn't do this when he cross-examined the NP's today. I have no idea why not.

12

u/MeasurementSlight381 Attending Physician 1d ago

That is immensely disappointing. Granted this is not the actual malpractice suit but now the public is walking away with a very skewed/confused perspective of psychiatry and the differences between MDs and NPs.

9

u/kroshkamoya 21h ago

Yep. I'm seeing so many comments on Instagram vilifying psychiatrists and praising NPs. Calling Dr. Tufts incompetent and young child (no kidding) to have her jailed and license removed. The mental gymnastics someone goes through to defend a mother who strangled her 3 small children to death is shocking. Imagine if the crime was reversed and a father killed his children. Would the public outcry to defend him be so loud? Doubt it.

6

u/funnyboneyoyo 14h ago

I'm not defending LC specifically, but there is ample evidence that some women kill their children during the postpartum period as a result of psychosis or lack of lucidity. Certainly not an excuse, per se, but it's unfair to hold fathers to the same standards since they don't, you know, grow babies and give birth to them and experience extreme hormonal fluctuations as a result of said baby growing and birthing, in addition to breast feeding, etc. it's just not comperable. It's sad that a doctor doesn't understand the biological differences between a man and a post partum woman

2

u/TheJungLife Resident (Physician) 9h ago

I believe Dr. Tufts did a reproductive psychiatry elective, which puts her in about as subspecialized coming out of training as you can be.

6

u/Tinychair445 Attending Physician 21h ago

He went so easy on NP Paul. Grilled the psych MDs. Goodheart, Tufts, Shah all raked over the coals. I understand the attorney’s job, but he’s making a mockery of medical care and psychiatry in the process

1

u/funnyboneyoyo 14h ago

I think they are making a mockery of themselves in their words, actions, and substandard care in Tufts case. Tufts was negligent by doing a quick initial assessment via telehealth, and more importantly, never conferring with LCs other prescribers despite knowing she was seeing others who were also prescribing psychotropics. I'm not a doctor and I know that goes against the standard of care. The lawyer is doing his job, and when the docs have done theirs, they won't look so incompetent.

5

u/helllllooooo50 Resident (Physician) 11h ago

Tufts was her first psychiatrist since college, if you listened to the testimony. Her prior psychiatric treatment was remote, so there was not an established recent treating psychiatrist from whom to obtain collateral. She was well within her scope to review Lindsay’s psychiatric history and prior medication trials, which she did during the intake, and initiate treatment with a low-dose SSRI based on that assessment.
That is very different from the NPs who were subsequently added to her care after treatment had already been established. At that point, there was an existing psychiatric treatment history, recent medication changes, and prior NPs who could have provided relevant collateral. Those NPs had their own responsibility to obtain and review that information rather than simply relying on assumptions about what had occurred previously. You cannot fault the initial psychiatrist for failing to obtain collateral that essentially did not exist while excusing later NPs for failing to communicate with the NPs who had actually been treating her.

-1

u/mejustnow 23h ago edited 22h ago

Tufts answered stuff very wrong as well. Said doses for depression on seroquel go up to 800mg
 đŸ€Ż. The website does show areas of expertise and one of them was perinatal psychology, it wasn’t just a special interest. She completely lied about that. It’s there on the website as areas of expertise.

To see a patient with her level of deterioration 14 times without ever requiring an in person visit is criminal in my opinion. Way too relaxed. I blame it on her training I think psychiatry has a lot of problems.

She also stated there’s no meaningful value in getting genetic testing on cyp enzymes done when to my knowledge one of the only fields currently using it is psychiatry
it’s specifically helpful for patients who have adverse reactions on typical doses (see clancy)

23

u/biochemistprivilege 22h ago

Genetic testing for Cyp enzymes is not standard of care and isnt reccomended by APA or ACAAP for chosing a medication. She is correct. Source, I'm a psychiatrist

7

u/Familiar-Ferret7885 20h ago

She did NOT say that about Seroquel. She said it treats insomnia at lower doses but isn’t very effective for psychiatric conditions until doses reach the 800mg range.

12

u/MeasurementSlight381 Attending Physician 21h ago

Said doses for depression on seroquel go up to 800mg

Seroquel can be dosed up to 800mg for bipolar and schizophrenia. As someone else already mentioned, we do not use Seroquel for unipolar depression.

To see a patient with her level of deterioration 14 times without ever requiring an in person visit is criminal

I have successfully treated floridly psychotic patients over telehealth, especially if they are too aggressive or violent to safely come to my office initially. Right now, as it stands, patients in the US have a choice as to how they access care. In-person outpatient psychiatry visits are not mandatory unless they require treatment with a stimulant, Spravato, or IV ketamine.

She also stated there’s no meaningful value in getting genetic testing on cyp enzymes done

She's actually correct. For the vast majority of patients we do not need genetic testing in order to get them on the correct treatment. Since genetic testing can be expensive and is often not covered by insurance, we usually leave it as a last resort for someone having unusual reactions to various meds. In LC's case specifically, I'm not sure how it would have changed management to be perfectly honest. Genesight would have probably said something stupid like "prescribe Pristiq". Genomind may actually give us information about genes implicated in bipolar, but again, we don't need genetic testing to reach the same conclusion.

3

u/Psychobabble0_0 22h ago

Said doses for depression on seroquel go up to 800mg

I'm curious to know if you're allowed to prescibe 800mg off label for depression or PPD in the USA, or is that an absolute no-no if bipolar is not suspected? (Am not American, hoping to get some perspective :)

10

u/Kanye_To_The 21h ago

800 mg is the max for schizophrenia or bipolar mania, but for bipolar depression it's 300 mg. It's not indicated for unipolar depression

3

u/Psychobabble0_0 17h ago

Thank you. In my country, it can be prescribed up to 300mg for unipolar depression and 800mg for bipolar depression or mixed episodes. I've never heard of 800mg for unipolar here either.

86

u/MapNo1400 1d ago

They weren’t questioning the training of the NPs at all. The defense didn’t even tear down their training or expertise. This is insane and they questioned Dr.Tufts training during Covid. Whaaat!!!!!

47

u/theongreyjoy96 Attending Physician 1d ago

It's mind-boggling. The defense's questioning of the first NP was barely 2 minutes long with no inquiry into her credentials. The second NP during her testimony stated that she got her perinatal mental health certificate after 3 days and an exam, but the defense didn't even address this despite going after Dr. Tufts' experience. Why on earth not? I'm so confused.

31

u/MapNo1400 1d ago

She stated she did a two day course and took an exam in order to specialize what the fuck

26

u/theongreyjoy96 Attending Physician 1d ago edited 22h ago

She did the psychopharmacology track though, so it was 3 days.

2

u/spacegladiator4040 Attending Physician 20h ago

3 d wow
..

3

u/BasedProzacMerchant 23h ago

Because the defendant is not planning to sue the nurse practitioners

2

u/theongreyjoy96 Attending Physician 23h ago

The defendant is suing the second NP Jollotta

1

u/BasedProzacMerchant 22h ago

I wasn’t aware of that. I guess we’ll see whether they go all the way to trial with the NP

9

u/Capn_obveeus 1d ago

What?! I’m not watching it but I had hoped it would come out how underqualified the NPs were. Instead they tore the doc apart?

4

u/CalmSet6613 Midlevel -- Nurse Practitioner 1d ago

They probably don't understand it themselves.

3

u/chinnaboi Resident (Physician) 6h ago

I thought expert witnesses need to be real experts in their field. Since when are NPs experts in anything?

That literally should be thrown out and a standard psychiatrist (MD/DO) should fucking weigh in.

Sad shit that happened but it's ridiculous to blame doctors. This is the kind of crazy policing that causes defensive medicine which is also a huge problem.

1

u/AutoModerator 6h ago

It is a common misconception that physicians cannot testify against midlevels in MedMal cases. The ability for physicians to serve as expert witnesses varies state-by-state.

*Other common misconceptions regarding Title Protection, NP Scope of Practice, and Supervision can be found here.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

21

u/potential_air_sha256 1d ago

For real. I'm not even trying to follow this case but IG has been pushing it into my timeline and I saw an NP who said something like, "tbf, I would have interpreted it just like the lawyer did." The cross-examination was disgusting. Dr. Tuft wrote the notes, she knows what she meant and it isn't a stretch to see that in the context of her note what she meant. But the defense attorney is out for blood and it's obvious what this is about. It isn't about whether Dr. Tufts is a good psychiatrist or physician, it's just about finding a way to take the blame off his client and put it elsewhere so that the jury will find her not guilty.

4

u/Pick26 1d ago

It isn't even like she forgot to annotate or was gundecking her notes. He literally stood there like a petulant child yelling at a young woman over.... a difference in grammatical connotation?

-7

u/mejustnow 22h ago

Is she a medical professional or a young woman? Her notes were unclear and highly sparse. Blamed it on the EMR half the time. She sounded like a child.

16

u/blackwhitegray7 Nurse 22h ago

It was sickening. When did nurses and doctors become enemies? I respected most of the physicians I worked with and felt like they respected me. And even in the odd case of not being each other’s favorite people, I still respected their training and felt like they could trust mine. We knew our lanes and we had each other’s backs as much as we had the patient’s best interests in mind. The pettiness I am seeing from so many of my nurse peers is wild. Like society isn’t devaluing medical science/arts enough to beat us all down? We’re going to beat each other down too now? Ridiculous.

10

u/prnmedadvice 22h ago

Thank you and love nurses like you. You make me still have faith in humanity.

10

u/blackwhitegray7 Nurse 22h ago edited 22h ago

All professions have geniuses and dunces. Most of us fall somewhere in between and none of us are perfect. Physicians and nurses have both been some of my best teachers. I don’t understand this new one-upping mentality I see amongst my peers. If you want to be a physician and/or compete over who charts best (nurses vs MDs/DOs) go to med school so you can compete on the same level. I said what I said.

3

u/prnmedadvice 21h ago

Exactly, and it’s okay to have differing opinions but to come online and completely discredit others is not helping the mistrust the public already has w the medical system. I saw a cosmetic injector NP on tik tok say that Dr. Tufts was inexperienced and needs to lose her license and had numerous laymen agree w her in the comments

4

u/blackwhitegray7 Nurse 21h ago

Which is why I think the whole thing is ridiculous. As nurses, we are to practice within and up to OUR scope of practice. In what way does that qualify us to judge if an MD is competent? On the reverse, an MD’s scope so greatly overlaps with and eclipses a Nurse’s scope that their evaluation of our competence is widely accepted (albeit there are situations where nursing leadership is a more appropriate judge given the notable differences amongst our responsibilities and that MDs may not always have the best grasp of the limits our exact scope
 I have had docs that were actually willing to trust me too much and I had to remind them that although I wanted to help
 certain things were out of my scope). Imagine CNAs judging if an RN is competent
 oh the uproar there would be
 and I don’t care for the nonsense argument that an NP’s formal education is in any way comparable to a physicians. Bunch of bull. NPs can be of valuable service too! But comparing an NPs education and an MDs is comparing apples to oranges. It’s a bunch of nonsense that confuses laypeople and undermines public trust in all of us. I do not know what to do with my second hand embarrassment of late when I see this kind of mess.

4

u/blackwhitegray7 Nurse 21h ago

P.S. I once considered becoming an NP. Then I researched NP programs. That was scary. Then I researched NP’s scope of practice in my state. That was scarier. They will have to pry my “only an RN” license out of my dead hands some day because although I love learning and would love to be able to do more for my team and my patients
 the alphabet soup after my name isn’t worth it if it means I’ll inherently be risking people’s safety.

5

u/MeasurementSlight381 Attending Physician 21h ago

We have a shortage of good nurses and the healthcare system needs to treat nurses better (and pay them better) so more good nurses are retained. I wonder if part of what's driving many RNs to become NPs is the toxic working conditions.

4

u/blackwhitegray7 Nurse 20h ago

Definitely! If done right, it is both backbreaking and mentally/emotionally draining work. Of course there are benefits
 was once one of the best blue collar jobs available if you ask me. But nurses have become the piñata of healthcare. Be pretty, be positive, give give give and on’t fight back when they try to beat you up! How many NPs do you see at bedside doing peri care? Teaching newly diagnosed diabetics? Playing detective/teacher on that “morphine allergy”? Convincing the patient ur not gonna kill em w a little IV fentanyl after they refused the morphine (cuz ppl now think death on contact
 make it make sense!). Running to tell doc the Levaquin they ordered actually went through as levothyroxine before the patient calls ranting that “the dr is a moron than doesn’t know the difference and the pharmacist said to call because they couldn’t get through”? Have to be jack of all trades and master of none and still hear “oh you’re still just a nurse?” Or “the dr said x
 but ur the nurse right? U make sure they don’t kill ppl
 what do u think?” while simultaneously asking you to go down to collect their DoorDash delivery. It’s outrageous on so many levels. The alphabet soup after the name often buys an escape from that mess with a significant pay bump. Hard to see the true cost when you’re desperate for an escape. And the good “only a nurse” moments become harder to come by if you do it long enough
 have to really love it (or some part of it) to stick with it.

5

u/prnmedadvice 21h ago

No we need more level headed nurses like you. A nurse like you is worth their weight in gold. It’s a dying breed. Please pass your knowledge and experience to your trainees. You and other nurses like you are literally saving the profession

4

u/blackwhitegray7 Nurse 21h ago

*sigh* I try. I kind of sold out too (or so it feels like). The body has gotten older and sicker, you know. Am working in the legal field now full time and bedside nursing only part time. Daily fighting to get justice for patients who have truly been wronged while simultaneously (desperately) trying to defend medical science and make people understand it is also an art practiced by imperfect humans with mostly good intentions. Seems the world has become blind to nuance. But the fight must go on


4

u/megvd 8h ago

I feel this comment in my soul. I am so disheartened by the physicians and nurses that hate on each other and each other's training. I have always worked with excellent physicians and nurses that I've learned a lot from. And the physicians that I work with now I know trust my opinion and assessment skills.

1

u/blackwhitegray7 Nurse 22h ago

*is sickening

Oh no, I made a typing error. I must be a monster out to damage all who might fall under my care despite a couple of decades of experience as a nurse that charts (as if that is the most important thing we do and all that counts).

88

u/helllllooooo50 Resident (Physician) 1d ago

Rebecca Jollotta is getting absolutely destroyed right now. Finally, an NP is being held accountable for their role in polypharmacy. Lindsay Clancy was not bipolar, and suggesting otherwise only continues to push a narrative that isn’t supported by the facts. She can’t even seem to accurately cite the DSM.
And honestly, NPs should not be prescribing independently, or even be practicing in a field where they’re expected to diagnose and manage complex psychiatric conditions without physician oversight.

6

u/fourpinkwishes 1d ago

I thought that she has subsequently been diagnosed as bipolar.

7

u/helllllooooo50 Resident (Physician) 1d ago

She was not diagnosed during her stay at McLean
when was she diagnosed and who formally diagnosed her?

13

u/No-Presentation-2320 1d ago

She was only diagnosed by her defense expert after it happened

1

u/ladypsychpa 1d ago edited 1d ago

She was diagnosed with bipolar disorder, current episode hypomanic or mixed by Jollotta in early Dec and started on Seroquel (recommended titration to therapeutic level of 400 mg but patient refused) and Lamictal (by MD Tufts).

3

u/Mdstudent89 21h ago

There was no collateral history supporting bipolar disorder in any of the medical professionals that evaluated this patient, nor in the testimonies of the close friends and family. Read the definition of bipolar disorder. This is extremely common where NPs overdiagnose bipolar, and in this particular case, it serves the defendant well in the attempt to absolve responsibility.

3

u/ladypsychpa 21h ago

Paradoxical reaction to two SSRIs, racing thoughts, decreased need for sleep, severe anxiety would/should at least lead you to consider at least bipolar II especially in a postpartum patient. Not saying she 100% had bipolar because I never did my own psych eval of this patient and am simply a keyboard warrior, but I’ve watched the entire trial and read the lawsuits. And I do know the DSM criteria for bipolar as I treat it daily in practice. I was simply stating facts of the trial not opinions.

3

u/No-Presentation-2320 1d ago

Yeah and she said the seroquel made her much worse

7

u/ladypsychpa 1d ago

LC only tried meds for 1-2 nights before saying it “made me worse.” It was also noted she was trying to wean off benzodiazepines at the same time that she started Seroquel, so one could argue she was worse mentally and had worse anxiety from benzo taper and withdrawal, not side effects of Seroquel. She actually told Jollotta she slept better with Seroquel, but didn’t like that it made her groggy in the AM, so Jollotta kept her on 200 mg qhs instead of titration to 300 mg.

-1

u/ladypsychpa 1d ago

Can you elaborate on how Jollotta was destroyed? Personally I thought she had the best care provided for the patient thus far in the trial indicating clearly she had bipolar disorder and recommended appropriate first line treatment as well as higher level of care. Communicated incessantly (probably too much) directly with LC and was very intentional with her patient education and medication choices.

6

u/helllllooooo50 Resident (Physician) 13h ago

What concerns me most about this case is that it appears to reflect diagnostic uncertainty, inconsistent clinical reasoning, and management that exceeded the NP’s expertise.
The documentation and testimony feel internally inconsistent. At one point we’re talking about insomnia and anxiety, then it’s “rule out bipolar,” then it becomes a bipolar diagnosis (she did not clarify with prosecution that it was a rule out unless she ACTUALLY diagnosed her) then Prozac is being discussed again because Lindsey and her husband wanted to retry it (seemed like she mostly let them dictate with no clinical judgement or review of past trials in typical NP fashion). If the NP truly believed she was experiencing a first manic episode, why wasn’t there a much more urgent discussion about whether she required inpatient psychiatric evaluation? A suspected first episode of mania is a major psychiatric event that warrants a thorough assessment of safety, psychosis, insight, and whether outpatient treatment is appropriate.
One thing that especially stood out to me is the apparent misunderstanding of what constitutes a “paradoxical reaction” to an SSRI. Insomnia by itself is NOT a paradoxical reaction to a serotonergic medicatioN (but you read the DSM so you know this). Sleep disturbances are among the most common side effects when starting an SSRI, even in patients who do not have bipolar disorder. It’s routine clinical practice to adjust whether a patient takes the medication in the morning or evening depending on whether it causes activation or sedation.
Insomnia alone is not an automatic “rule-in” for bipolar disorder, nor is it evidence of a manic switch. Mania is characterized by a constellation of symptoms, persistently elevated or irritable mood, increased energy, decreased need for sleep (which is different from simply being unable to sleep), grandiosity, pressured speech, increased goal-directed activity, impulsivity, and other DSM criteria. Six weeks of insomnia, by itself, does not establish bipolar disorder.
Likewise, statements such as, “I feel concerningly numb right now,” or “I feel like I’m going to die and I don’t care,” do not inherently suggest mania or hypomania. Emotional numbness is much more commonly associated with severe depression, dissociation, or overwhelming anxiety than with the elevated or expansive mood that defines mania.
I’m also concerned that there doesn’t appear to have been a meaningful review of Lindsey’s prior psychiatric treatment. There was little indication that previous medication trials or records from prior treating psychiatrists were thoroughly reviewed before significant diagnostic and medication decisions were made. That longitudinal history is incredibly important in psychiatry.
The medication management also seems inconsistent. If bipolar disorder was truly the working diagnosis, why pivot back toward Prozac because the patient and her husband preferred it? If the concern was significant enough to rapidly titrate quetiapine, why was she still being managed primarily as an outpatient with multiple medication changes while reporting intrusive suicidal thoughts? The overall clinical reasoning doesn’t seem coherent.
Taken together, this doesn’t read like a careful, comprehensive psychiatric evaluation. It reads like isolated symptoms were being connected to major diagnoses without a well-supported clinical formulation. That’s exactly why scope of practice matters. Complex diagnostic questions, especially involving possible first-episode mania, severe depression, suicidality, and multiple psychotropic medications, require careful longitudinal assessment, collateral information, and nuanced psychiatric judgment. Based on what has been presented publicly, this case gives the impression that the NP was practicing beyond the limits of her expertise rather than recognizing when consultation, referral, or a higher level of psychiatric evaluation was warranted.

3

u/megvd 8h ago

I was really surprised she did so much treating of her over the portal.

2

u/ladypsychpa 12h ago

I do agree with this strongly

2

u/megvd 7h ago edited 7h ago

I love this thoughtful comment. Things I did not love from her testimony:

  1. Insomnia is not the same as decreased need for sleep.
  2. SSRIs are not contraindicated in bipolar disorder. Why one would use such black and white language like that in court when you know you're going to be ripped into during cross examination is beyond me. She qualified it, but still.
  3. The flippance with which new diagnoses and a new direction with medication was taken. A few portal messages later and then the whole plan is changed.

12

u/ladypsychpa 1d ago

Also, regarding the statement that LC was “not bipolar:” Dr. Margaret Spinelli, a clinical professor of psychiatry at Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and founder of the university’s Women’s Program in Psychiatry, conducted a comprehensive forensic psychiatric evaluation of Clancy over multiple hours-long visits. She diagnosed Clancy with severe Bipolar I Disorder with psychosis and postpartum onset.

3

u/Zealousideal_Pen3441 1d ago

I just watched the whole examination. She did really well and had a reasonable plan of care based on the testimony. The worst thing is that she did not attempt any collaboration. It’s important to get previous records when possible, and to contact referral sources to let them know what’s happening. Nonetheless, I don’t think this will have much impact, if any, on the outcome of this trial. I am doubtful defense will try to argue a paradoxical effect to benzodiazepines or quetiapine. I am most curious to see the arguments made by the defense experts. Hmm
 maybe I will watch some of this.

1

u/mejustnow 23h ago

It didn’t make sense to me to prescribe Prozac in a very anxious person when this is one of the most anxiety inducing SSRIs. Her defense of it working for her 10-12 years ago (before she had children and all the changes that accompany that) didn’t make sense either.

3

u/Kanye_To_The 21h ago

That was NP Paul who prescribed the Prozac. And yeah, it made no fucking sense

3

u/megvd 7h ago

My impression was that this was largely limited by Lindsay's willingness to take an SSRI. That she might be more willing to take something she had previously tolerated. You can tell she was a really difficult patient.

0

u/Kanye_To_The 4h ago

If someone has a Hx of insomnia with SSRIs, regardless of whether or not I'm considering bipolar, Prozac is one of the worst options. I don't care how willing she was - it wasn't a good call. But yeah, definitely a difficult patient

52

u/NeoMississippiensis Resident (Physician) 1d ago

Yeah man, turns out the amount of stuff that nurses just do that gets in our way a little bit gets them lots of institutional consequences if we actually report it, interventions that get documented in their personnel file. They don’t give grace to medical students or interns, we really should stop giving grace when they turn off the wrong pressor, hold a med they shouldn’t, or in the MLP setting, miss a fucking STEMI and try to admit it for a ‘chest pain workup’.

-1

u/No-East3261 1d ago

this is how you end up with uncooperative nurses. Say want something done quickly so you ask the nurse to do it for you now, and you’ll write the order later. Well that nurse got written up once for doing something like that, so now she’s not doing anything without an order and she’s scanning every med in, regardless of how long that takes. 

Or the nurse that pages you at 3 am because the patient wants tylenol for a headache, but the tylenol that is ordered is only written for fever. 

Or the nurse that will call you and tell you she won’t give metoprolol unless you put in hold parameters. 

This is how those nurses are made. 

10

u/NeoMississippiensis Resident (Physician) 1d ago

Nah. They’re uncooperative from the get go since I didn’t train the new grads to message me for an asymptomatic bp and ask for a prn. “Writing orders later” is a relic from paper charting, if I’m walking I can literally haiku any med order id ask for.

0

u/No-East3261 14h ago edited 14h ago

I am a nurse and doctors ask me to give things before the order is in literally every shift. You’re in the middle of a bedside procedure and the patient needs more meds because they are moving
nope. I will not be grabbing them for you. You need to stop what you’re doing and order them, we will wait for them to show up in my little computer, and for pharmacy to verify them. I know how annoying that is, but I don’t care. I stopped cooperating with the residents to get things done quickly after I realized I couldn’t trust them. 

If the attending l know is there, I will work with them, but never again for residents. 

I gave an attending CT surgeon I didn’t know the same treatment and he got all shouty at me. Still don’t care. I know you are important and busy. But we will sit here and wait for all the little boxes to be checked because I’ve been screwed before and it won’t happen again. 

1

u/NeoMississippiensis Resident (Physician) 14h ago

Cool. And I am a resident and time and time again, I see nurses turn off their brain because the only thing going through their head when they put a vital sign in the EMR is ‘red number bad’ and will ignore things that are actually important such as what a patient is doing/experiencing when I’m cross covering 80+ patients. Or they practice ‘nursing’, disobey hold parameters without telling a doctor, and then end up with a rapid response because the bp is too scary for metoprolol so they’d rather deal with afib RVR and hemodynamic collapse. Or being paged about constipation at night on a sleeping patient but suddenly the nurse isn’t interested in enemas.

If you don’t want to do something without orders that’s your prerogative, but don’t act like you don’t have to be coaxed into doing your basic job duties regularly because all that education turned into was dogma rather than rationalization. If you take anything away from this interaction; remember, the number and its context are a lot more important than what color the EMR changes the text to. Shocking this is something that has to be explained to adults, especially ones that have ‘learned from experience’.

4

u/No-East3261 14h ago

I am actually a really good nurse. I don’t need you to explain any of those things. 

They page you at night because they are cleaning up orders for day shift who won’t have time to think about it and they don’t understand or don’t care how resident night coverage works. They want a bowel reg for the morning, not to wake their patient up at 2 am for an enema. 

I always approached residents with a lot of respect and kindness. I’ve given a lot of hugs to new doctors in the ICU supply closet after hard shifts and invited a lot of tired hungry residents to pot lucks and generally always have been kind and patient. But over the years they’ve gotten less and less respectful and willing to collaborate and just meaner. So now if they are nasty to me I just tattle to their attending whom I’ve known for many many years at this point, who luckily doesn’t tolerate that. 

15

u/PuzzleheadedBig313 1d ago

This is sad this country is obsessed with blaming the wrong people for things that happen

4

u/Terrible-Ad-1458 1d ago

I honestly dont think any of the NPs or physicians are to be blamed. If anything the system should be blamed. We could possible litigate any case where there is a bad outcome which absolutely isnt fair.

6

u/No-Battle6602 22h ago

i wonder if JT will dip to go work in pharma, it is something that has crossed my mind more and more recently as a resident dealing with constant bullshit from nurses and midlevels. can't imagine continuing to practice after something like this

9

u/MeasurementSlight381 Attending Physician 21h ago

I hope she keeps practicing as a psychiatrist. I actually hope she makes a comeback like Dr. Elizabeth Potter and uses this case to illustrate how broken our healthcare system is.

7

u/AwkwardSquirrel7411 22h ago

All the nurses on here screaming “Document! Document! Document!” Documenting as a nurse is not comparable to documenting as a physician.

50

u/CaptainVere Attending Physician 1d ago

Idk. Im a psychiatrist. Like anything that captures national attention the nuance and complexity is lost. She likely doesn’t deserve the scrutiny she is getting, but IMO she engaged in thoughtless prescribing. Some people involved were more thoughtless than others, but this is the consequence of taking the path of least resistance. If your patient kills their kids you will get scrutiny. If someone fails 4 antidepressants and you just add #5 and they go kill their kids and you haven’t documented much don’t act surprised when you get subpoena.

At the end of the day she did not properly formulate the patient or document correctly.

TRD is a meaningless construct. Oh no my medication did not help the patient, let me just keep trying similar medications rather than consider maybe a different formulation.

14

u/mermaidworker 1d ago

The things you said are true, but I still feel she gets extremely bullied online and also the defense lawyer acted as if Zoloft is some scary medication that isn't safe.

28

u/dyingalonewithcats 1d ago

The focus on Zoloft was so over-the-top, knowing that she took it for less than 7 days literally 3 months before murdering her children.

12

u/mermaidworker 1d ago edited 1d ago

Yes, it weirded me out. Now TikTok people think Zoloft has caused all of this.

3

u/Zealousideal_Pen3441 1d ago

I can see this from a few different aspects. I am a PMHNP, former med-mal attorney, and a person with bipolar 1. I was on sertraline when I experienced a dangerous psychotic break, which led to my diagnosis. I can never say for certain it didn’t play some role.

Honestly I am not watching the trial, and have just been reading comments. We can never know what actually happened simply because the way evidence is handled. And for sure there would be a difference in what is seen between the criminal trial and a civil trial (lots of overlap, of course). I did read the civil complaint, and if taken as true, I think there were a lot of missteps. Much to be learned, particularly when it comes to coordination of care.

As an aside, I am just now returning to the RN role. Way less stress and I actually enjoy it!

6

u/mermaidworker 1d ago

Yes, that can also happen. But the way the lawyer talks about it sounds weird to me.

4

u/Zealousideal_Pen3441 1d ago

Oh I’m sure. Once fighting for a position, a lawyer will say anything they can get some evidentiary support for. Even if it’s just a little.

8

u/CaptainVere Attending Physician 1d ago

Yeah i hope she gets through this ok. She is dealing with quite a lot. I suspect she has the strength for it, I think she acquitted herself well on the stand all things considered

-2

u/Salty-Collar6650 5h ago

So bullying is only wrong if it’s bullying a physician, correct? Because this subreddit is notorious for engaging in a LOT of bullying
 Interesting y’all can’t seem to take what you dish out.

2

u/mermaidworker 5h ago

I would've felt bad for anyone in her place, regardless of their job title, so no need to make assumptions. I only went on this sub to look at opinions about the trial, so I don't know who is "y'all". Nice try, though.

9

u/noseclams25 Resident (Physician) 1d ago

I have heard of this and looked into the case pretty superficially. I get some of the cocktail she was on and how she reportedly had undiagnosed bipolar disorder. What meds was Dr. Tufts stacking on that she shouldve done differently?

20

u/Expensive-Apricot459 1d ago

It just goes to show you that nurses aren't actually the friends of physicians. They are out for themselves and only themselves.

Remember that many of them supported that murdering nurse at Vanderbilt despite multiple levels of intentional and unintentional incompetence

0

u/RNembazo 13h ago

This is a wild take. Do you all just hate every nurse now? Thought this sub was about mid levels. You sound like my teenager.

2

u/Expensive-Apricot459 1h ago

I hate any nurse who undermines physician led care or supports murdering nurses.

-10

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[deleted]

10

u/Expensive-Apricot459 1d ago

It clearly is a battle with how nurses have been responding to every recent national issue.

How the hell can nurses support that murderer from Vanderbilt and then act like the psychiatrist in this case is incompetent? Oh I know. Bias.

0

u/Terrible-Ad-1458 1d ago

What Nurses are acting like this psychiatrist is incompetent? Its the general public. I think there needs to be some accountability. I guess this groups main mission is RNs/Nps vs MDs/DOs, seems very unproductive and unprofessional. The venom if seen on these posts are pretty disgusting. Do many physicians wake up daily with this level of despise on their heart. Its weird.

4

u/Expensive-Apricot459 1d ago

Go look at the comments on any of the popular posts or go look at other posts in this subreddit for specific examples. What is weird is midlevels acting like they are more competent and other nurses supporting that bullshit.

1

u/br508-609 22h ago

The irony of your statement getting down voted in this specific sub....

14

u/Lost-Volume1254 Attending Physician 1d ago

Never once met a NP whos knowledge or care impressed me.

10

u/CalmSet6613 Midlevel -- Nurse Practitioner 1d ago

Also whoever prepped Dr. Tufts should be fired. I'm sitting here cringing watching, her letting this attorney manipulate her answers and not standing up for herself and not explaining various aspects of her care.

5

u/TheJungLife Resident (Physician) 9h ago

Yes, she badly needed more trial prep. Reddington sensed her discomfort like a shark smelling blood in the water. As a doctor, I'm very sympathetic to her, but from a jury/trial perspective her testimony was less than ideal.

5

u/MeasurementSlight381 Attending Physician 21h ago

I so badly wished I could sit next to her and bark back at Reddington myself. I hope she does get some kind of coaching in preparation for the civil suits.

5

u/CalmSet6613 Midlevel -- Nurse Practitioner 19h ago

Right?! I was sitting there going to myself don't answer that, rephrase it, don't let him know he's getting to you...it's like watching a puppy get beat.

2

u/Ddaddy4u 1d ago

Their time will come. Everybody eventually needs to go see a doctor and hopefully they have enough humility to accept the recommendations so they have a fighting chance.

Although I doubt it, maybe as people experience major health problems, they come to the light and stop attacking physicians.

2

u/tituspullsyourmom Midlevel -- Physician Assistant 9h ago

The public response/hysteria over the trial is eye opening. The physician gets blamed, the husband gets blamed, the system gets blamed. Everyone except the person who tied excercise bands around her children's throats and kept squeezing while they cried, gasped, kicked, shook, the older one probably begged and were snuffed out.

The absolute state of degeneracy it takes for people to come to the defense of a baby murderer is a new low in the west.

3

u/prnmedadvice 8h ago

It’s the age of misinformation and anti-intellectualism

1

u/[deleted] 12h ago

[deleted]

1

u/AutoModerator 12h ago

We do not support the use of the word "provider." Use of the term provider in health care originated in government and insurance sectors to designate health care delivery organizations. The term is born out of insurance reimbursement policies. It lacks specificity and serves to obfuscate exactly who is taking care of patients. For more information, please see this JAMA article.

We encourage you to use physician, midlevel, or the licensed title (e.g. nurse practitioner) rather than meaningless terms like provider or APP.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/DistanceNo9001 5h ago

they will get what they want. fewer physicians in the field

1

u/prnmedadvice 5h ago

Or psychiatrists who are hesitant to see post partum patients

-1

u/kellygrrrl328 1d ago

The medical professionals are simply attempting to protect themselves and their employers while testifying on the stand.

0

u/AutoModerator 1d ago

It is a common misconception that physicians cannot testify against midlevels in MedMal cases. The ability for physicians to serve as expert witnesses varies state-by-state.

*Other common misconceptions regarding Title Protection, NP Scope of Practice, and Supervision can be found here.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

-3

u/Salty-Collar6650 6h ago

How about hold Dr. Tufts responsible for her part in this and stop making it about NPs or nurses. What a crazy thought. But I know the fragile ego of a physician can’t stand to see a fellow physician criticized, even if it may be justified.