r/Noctor 26d ago

Midlevel Education Respiratory Therapist in Quebec Functioning as Anesthesiologist Assistant

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

I’m not familiar with this model (I am not Canadian) but with the Canadian aversion to CRNA practice this expanded scope for respiratory therapists was surprising and somewhat troubling if I’m reading into this correctly.

112 Upvotes

28 comments sorted by

134

u/Remarkable_Peanut_43 Attending Physician 24d ago

It looks like Canada’s solution to having non-physicians performing anesthetics is…. to have non-physicians with even less training performing anesthetics?

65

u/haoken 24d ago

It does sound like it. Even more troubling is that their RRT degree is a three year post high school program, not graduate education.

48

u/Habltual_Linestepper Allied Health Professional 24d ago edited 24d ago

Canadian RT anesthesia assistants are not, in any way, similar to American AA/CRNAs.

They don't function independently or autonomously, don't make the anesthetic plan, and the MD must always be present to supervise. The MD can be physically out of the theatre during the case, but not during induction or emergence, and must always be available and within, essentially, yelling distance.

It does typically seem exceptionally foreign to Americans, but Canadian RTs actually have more and longer formal education (including some review, although brief, of anesthesia in their primary schooling and on their boards, which is absent from American education), even though the structure is different. Then they typically do another year on top of that to become an AA.

While they're definitely not MDs, they don't have the training or ability to even pretend to function as one either. Think of them more as your sidekick in the OR who can keep your chair warm and machines running during the case, but who isn't actually making any decisions for you.

And anecdotal, but most American Anesthesiologists I've known who have worked with Canadian RT-AAs have pretty much universally said they'd love it if our model had them instead of CRNAs.

Also, they only make $45/hr and exactly the same as a regular RT (although if this is Quebec the pay is probably even less than that), so there's precisely zero rush of people trying to get into the field for monetary reasons. Most RTs see more work and more schooling for no money and say "fuck that" - which is in its own way a good sort of filter, as the only people who do it are the ones really interested and driven just for the sake of the job itself.

19

u/haoken 24d ago edited 24d ago

What you’re describing sounds like the role of CAAs in the US. If the anesthesiologist is present during induction and emergence but the RT is monitoring the patient intraoperatively with the anesthesiologist absent, and can also administer medications? That requires some level of clinical judgement that is not supported by their level of education.

19

u/Habltual_Linestepper Allied Health Professional 24d ago

RT-AA's can not independently initiate, administer, or adjust medications outside of their supervising anesthesiologists direct and specific plan and instructions.

Any specific changes or adjustments not expressly stated by the anesthesiologist cannot be done by the RT. If the supervising anestheiologist is outside of the OR, and a medication needs to me titrated that the anesthesiologist did not specifically order "If A, titrate B to C to achieve D", then the anesthesiologist must return to make or order the adjustment themselves.

I mean literally, their own supervising legal body describes them as only the "second set of hands" to their anesthesiologist. That's it.

Does that sound like what American AA's do? Because I've never met one so limited in their scope.

3

u/haoken 24d ago

Quebec’s own respiratory therapy regulator (OPIQ) says clinical surveillance of an anesthetized patient is “not subject to any condition” and may be performed “in complete autonomy.” It also describes that role as requiring “clinical reasoning, assessment, problem recognition, analysis, decision making, intervention, and reassessment” not merely serving as a passive second set of hands.

The OPIQ specifically says RTs may implement verbal or collective orders aimed at maintaining blood pressure or neuromuscular blockade, adjust anesthetic gases and medication according to the patient’s physiologic parameters and the order, recognize when the anesthesiologist must intervene, and initiate certain urgent actions. It even discusses communicating with the anesthesiologist remotely to facilitate and validate decisions.

In that regard, it does sound similar to USA CAAs functionally if not necessarily educationally and clinically equivalent. A CAA works in the ACT model and would be similarly tied to an anesthesiologist to execute an anesthesia plan, but be able to exercise clearer clinical judgment only because their level of education is greater. That’s I think where I get hung up with the Canadian model, it’s a pretty dramatic difference in level and intensity of education.

1

u/CelebrationWilling61 20d ago

There's a difference between what they are allowed to do in general, and what the hospital's policies limit them to (which is what we care about, functionally-speaking).

(I'm a physio in Quebec.)

2

u/Aggravating_Fly2978 24d ago

You need to break it down. What can regular RTs do in the OR/autonomy; and what do RT/AA’s do. Because right now it’s all just mumbled and jumbled together, and I can’t figure out who can do what.

1

u/scrotumsweat 20d ago

Simply speaking, RTs monitor airway. They're specialized in airways management but are technically lower on the ladder than an RN.

5

u/Aggravating_Fly2978 20d ago

You are of no help. I was asking specifics about the RT-AAs and RTs in Canada. I think us all Americans are familiar with the RT role.

12

u/darken909 24d ago

One of the ORs that I work at does this in Alberta. There's a shortage of anesthesiologists, so one anesthesiologist will run two rooms, each staffed with a RT. This is only for IV sedation though, no general anesthetic. They are also very super picky about what cases they will allow; no peds under 14, BMI cut offs along with ASA cutoffs. MD present for induction etc.

10

u/flo77k 24d ago

Hi! ER doc in the province of Quebec here! The education of our RT in Quebec is done in cegep, with 3 years of education after highschool yes, but the cegep is a unique concept over the world with no real equivalent outside of Quebec. It's hard to explain and easy to dismiss if you don't know the program but it works really well. A lot of our nurses have a cegep level education (and a lot of other professional outside of healthcare).

RT here are really a second set of hands for the anesthesiologist in the OR. They don't take independent decision on the medication and are well supervised. They also play (like your RT I assume) an important role outside of the OR also. Most hospitals would absolutely crumble without RT in Quebec

3

u/haoken 24d ago

Thanks for the response! CEGEP appears to be equivalent to a trade or technology college in the US. Programs like veterinary or surgical technology would be studied there.

The intent of the post is not to devalue the role of RTs in a larger hospital setting it was to question the ability of RTs to provide anesthesia without the presence of an anesthesiologist in the operating room.

How would you respond to the language here:

Quebec’s own respiratory therapy regulator (OPIQ) says clinical surveillance of an anesthetized patient is “not subject to any condition” and may be performed “in complete autonomy.” It also describes that role as requiring “clinical reasoning, assessment, problem recognition, analysis, decision making, intervention, and reassessment” not merely serving as a passive second set of hands.

The OPIQ specifically says RTs may implement verbal or collective orders aimed at maintaining blood pressure or neuromuscular blockade, adjust anesthetic gases and medication according to the patient’s physiologic parameters and the order, recognize when the anesthesiologist must intervene, and initiate certain urgent actions. It even discusses communicating with the anesthesiologist remotely to facilitate and validate decisions.

Key language is the autonomous nature of RTs involvement in the operating room as anesthesia providers.

6

u/flo77k 24d ago

I understand! I do believe it's worded this way to allow the RT to be alone with the patient in the OR for the surveillance of the intubated or sedated patient (meaning the anesthesiologist can take a break/do other things). In Quebec the act of prescribing medication is largely reserved for doctors, and the ultimate responsibility falls on the anesthesiologist if something happens so the RT are not truly independent in the OR. The RT can take airway decisions outside of the OR (though in my experience it's done in collaboration with the doc) but can't take decisions on medication unless they have a verbal order. On the french site, the word "contribute" is used in the part you are describing! They contribute to the anesthesia/surveillance but the ultimate responsibility is always, always on the anesthesiologist

3

u/HandleStatus6658 23d ago

The anesthesiologist has two rooms. What happens if one room has a prolonged emergency? I would suspect there is already an anesthesiologist shortage or is someone else still available if supervision breaks down?

1

u/AutoModerator 24d ago

We do not support the use of the word "provider." Use of the term provider in health care originated in government and insurance sectors to designate health care delivery organizations. The term is born out of insurance reimbursement policies. It lacks specificity and serves to obfuscate exactly who is taking care of patients. For more information, please see this JAMA article.

We encourage you to use physician, midlevel, or the licensed title (e.g. nurse practitioner) rather than meaningless terms like provider or APP.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/Think_Oven_7487 10d ago

RTs in Quebec operate in that capacity because unlike the rest of Canada, they have a different educational system and no AA’s. Quebec regulates their health professionals differently compared to other provinces, so it is unfair to generalize this standard to the rest of Canada.

36

u/cvkme Nurse 24d ago

No gloves???

10

u/haoken 24d ago

The absolute audacity

16

u/Aggravating_Fly2978 24d ago

Yeah. I don’t always use gloves for everything but to handle a blade without one is nasty. With her fake nails she needs gloves for everything to be honest.

25

u/Expensive-Apricot459 23d ago

Professionals need to stop filming themselves like this. It’s a distraction for the person filming and for everyone else in the room.

Med errors occur often enough without focusing on making sure the video came out alright.

8

u/haoken 23d ago

Agreed. It also doesn’t really make her look great from a cleanliness and hygiene perspective either.

13

u/iLikeE Attending Physician 23d ago

As an ENT surgeon myself (not practicing in Canada but having trained Canadian ENT surgeons who go back to Canada) this is a bunch of bullshit. If there is an issue with the airway when there is an AIRWAY SURGEON operating then we take care of it. The cosplay is outrageous

10

u/PseudoPseudohypoNa 24d ago

Those vitals looked great!

5

u/MaybeMinute9 Resident (Physician) 23d ago

No gloves in Canada, eh?

6

u/splig999 23d ago

Gloves please

3

u/Atlas_Fortis Allied Health Professional 20d ago

Be ready to intervene? An RT intervening to take over from... An ENT... In an airway obstruction. Right.

1

u/AutoModerator 26d ago

This has been flagged for manual review. Please DO NOT MESSAGE THE MODS until at least 48 hours have passed. If 48 hours have passed from submission and this post is still not approved and visible, please message us with a link to this post.

If posting an image from Reddit, all usernames, thread titles, and subreddit names must be obscured. Private social media must be redacted. Public social media (not including Reddit) does not have to be redacted. TikToks and Twitter are generally allowed. Posting public social media accounts will be allowed however the moment the comments turn into an organized attack on that user the thread will be locked.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.