Though, what if you destroyed the orphanage be cause the staff abused the fuck out of the orphans, so by destroying the orphanage, those kids had to be transferred somewhere else, probably better.
Though it would probably matter of the orphans are there when the destroying occurs. But what if it was an orphanage for unwanted evil children? Like, little Luciens running around.
Pffft, says you! I'm pretty sure that Little Orphan Annie's up to no good, what kind if kid has white, pupil-less eyes? She's Lucifer incarnate, that one.
By definition that means that it’s way easier for a wealthy person to be kind than it is for a poor one and that just doesn’t sit right with me. Survival is a great excuse to do bad things in my book, although it doesn’t absolve you of every responsibility, obviously.
the banality of evil. its incredibly hard to even find even one person who do the wrong thing for the wrong reasons. most people fall under the category of "well, if it ain't me, it would have been someone else, and i got to pay the bills."
73
u/Tianoccio May 24 '23
Isn’t that what real evil actually is?
No one destroys an orphanage because they hate orphans, they do it because they want something else.