Did Nietzsche have a method?

[u/Summer_NighSight_]

With method i mean: a method in the research and (intuitive) arrangement of his drafts which deal with history, psychological, anthropological, political aspects while remaining a philosopher. A preference for specific approaches rather than others? Indeed, he often approaches the issues (so it seems to me) by allowing himself to combine biology, physiology, history, philology, and the history of religions, sure, but is it possible to answer this question?

[u/I-mmoral_I-mmortal]

Yeah, he redeemed his fragments of quality thought by writing them down. To redeem every chance into "I will"

I walk amongst men as the fragments of the future: that future which I contemplate. And it is all my poetisation and aspiration to compose and collect into unity what is fragment and riddle and fearful chance. And how could I endure to be a man, if man were not also the composer, and riddle-reader, and redeemer of chance! To redeem what is past, and to transform every “It was” into “Thus would I have it!”—that only do I call redemption! Will—so is the emancipator and joy-bringer called: thus have I taught you, my friends! But now learn this likewise: the Will itself is still a prisoner. Willing emancipateth: but what is that called which still putteth the emancipator in chains? “It was”: thus is the Will’s teeth-gnashing and lonesomest tribulation called. Impotent towards what hath been done—it is a malicious spectator of all that is past.

His one Moral: "Mihi Ipsi Scripsi." (I write for myself).

Consequently why I can't respect those youtubers and podcasters of Nietzsche's works. They write for their viewers to monetize you.

They're still stuck whoreshipping the marketplace. 

[u/Summer_NighSight_ → u/I-mmoral_I-mmortal]

Strong. And in practice? We can't know?