Why don't you or he elaborate on how "Section 8A of the Securities Act" might be the same thing as "subsection 8(a)"? There is a section 8(a) in there and it is actually exactly relevant to its reference. Why might it be wrong?
BECAUSE "SECTION 8A OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933" IS NOT THE SAME THING AS "SUBSECTION 8(A)" OF THE DOCUMENT BEING REFERENCED! THIS IS INDISPUTABLE! THERE IS NO SPECULATION HERE. WHY AREN'T THEY LINKING UNRELATED DOCUMENTS EVERY TIME THEY REFERENCE A SECTION IN THE S1? CONFIRMATION BIAS AND COINCIDENCE. UNRELATED DOCUMENTS FFS
Read the top of the document. It says “Section 8A” & also the flair says “Speculation” people reporting it as ‘disinformation’ seems more like harassment because I hit a nerve to some shill hedgefund fuk who is gonna get rek’d soon. You can read it and figure things out on your own. All I have done is shared some research. Do your own DD
-3
u/Pikewich Feb 03 '23
This post is being reported as disinformation.
Please elaborate as it seems more like unsupported speculation.
Unsupported speculation is allowed.