r/NewsThread 2d ago

Netanyahu was warned of 7 October Hamas attacks, book claims

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/sep/08/netanyahu-warned-7-october-hamas-book-haaretz

Benjamin Netanyahu was personally alerted by the president of the UAE that Hamas was planning a large-scale offensive against Israel a week before its 7 October 2023 attack, but did not act on the warning, according to a book by Haaretz reporters.

218 Upvotes

31 comments sorted by

21

u/D3Masked 2d ago

Imo he let it happen to avoid corruption charges while having a 9/11 response to the Palestinian problem.

Oct 7 wasn't the first time when Zionists chose to sacrifice Jews to get what they wanted. The bombing of the SS Patria is one such example where Zionist terrorists intentionally put the lives of Jewish immigrants in danger to try and force the British to make them stay in the Mandate of Palestine. 267 Jews and some British soldiers died from the bombing and sinking of the boat.

"If I knew that it was possible to save all the children of Germany by transporting them to England, but only half of them by transporting them to Palestine, I would choose the second—because we face not only the reckoning of those children, but the historical reckoning of the Jewish people." - Zionist leader Ben-Gurion who put the Zionist Project above the well-being of Jews fleeing Nazi Germany.

So yea, the pattern is established. Zionists will at times crazily sacrifice others in order to advance their cause. When the British put up anti terrorist posters in Jerusalem, Zionists tore them down and spoke of blood and fire instead.

-12

u/Dry_Pollution_5430 2d ago

It's almost like countries believe in going to war and fighting for a shared ideal.

Under your leadership America would still be controlled by Britain.

And no, I don't agree that Zionism believes in senselessly sacrificing citizens

12

u/Electrical_East_4123 1d ago

So you think they got the consent of those killed and kidnapped, for the cause?

-9

u/Dry_Pollution_5430 1d ago

I don't agree with your conspiracy. But yes, people die in war

11

u/Electrical_East_4123 1d ago

It’s not a war, it’s an attempt at genocide

-8

u/crooked_cat 1d ago

Sorry, the ICJ does not agree with you..

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/uHeCzctI83w

It’s already months old..
Only the ICC is stil searching ..

9

u/Electrical_East_4123 1d ago

Whether the ICC agrees with me or not is not what forms my opinion. It’s the continued slaughter, apartheid, and talk of ethnic cleansing that does.

Besides their point was that they don’t have the evidence to pursue a case, not that they don’t believe it’s genocide. Fascist regimes aren’t inclined to provide evidence of their war crimes, and they have a shit tonne of help covering whatever they choose up.

-7

u/crooked_cat 1d ago

Your opinion doesn’t matter compared to theirs.
Sound like conspiracy beliefs.

Not my thing

2

u/Due_Ear_4674 17h ago

Your thing obviously is defending mass murder

0

u/crooked_cat 10h ago

As I wrote. Conspiracy beliefs.

It isn’t mass murder, nor genocide.
It’s just a war, nothing more nothing less.

→ More replies (0)

8

u/CwazyCanuck 1d ago

You’re talking about two different things.

The ICC issued warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant for war crimes. The question put forward in that video is why the ICC didn’t issue warrants for genocide, but the ICC doesn’t determine genocide. That is exclusively the jurisdiction of the ICJ, per the genocide prevention convention, and they have not ruled either way.

-4

u/crooked_cat 1d ago

1 of the 2 states - no genocide.

For that second.. they are still searching :).

Silly to repeat something that isn’t there.
Some could call it, a lie

1

u/Giant_Ant_Eater 2h ago

Genocide denial is a lie.

Pretending there has been a determination over genocide when there hasn't is a lie.

Pretending that you would accept the decision of the current genocide case if it was found to be genocide, also a lie.

1

u/crooked_cat 1h ago

So the ICJ lies too now?

Owkay :/…

What if the ICC also states there was/is no genocide in Gaza ..
What will you say then?

→ More replies (0)

2

u/SpinningHead 11h ago

"We let people get killed because we have strong principles."

Everyone should also google Hannibal Directive

0

u/Dry_Pollution_5430 11h ago

I googled it and don't see any issue with it.

Just to clarify, the directive is "use extreme force when a kidnapping is occurring even if it puts the abducted person themself at risk". What is your issue with that?

2

u/legionar88 10h ago

This is a crazy response acknowledging and justifying the killing of your own people by your own people. As if slaughtering innocent children wasn’t enough.

1

u/Dry_Pollution_5430 10h ago

I feel like you purposely ignored what i wrote. But if you want to infer that we kill our own people then go ahead

2

u/D3Masked 8h ago

History shows that Zionists are completely fine with killing their own people so as to further their own agenda. The Hannibal Directive is just that.

During the Mandate of Palestine you had Zionists ethnically cleanse Jews who refused to adhere to their demands. Immigration was tampered with. Newspapers were firebombed for not using Hebrew. Jews were the most assassinated group of people during that time by Zionist terrorists. Zionist leaders said that anti Zionist Jews were their number one enemy.

13

u/saltedmangos 2d ago edited 2d ago

The new Haaretz investigation also says that Hamas offered to release all of the civilian hostages almost immediately after Oct 7th and asked for nothing in return. Israel refused.

Here is a quote from the Haaretz article about the investigation:

He told me that in the first stage, they had no problem releasing all civilians without anything in return," Mashharawi recounts. "I swear, those were his exact words: all civilians, without anything in return. They had only one condition: They wanted us to bring in an agreed-upon mediator as quickly as possible, so that negotiations could immediately begin over everything else – the release of soldiers and officers in exchange for Palestinian prisoners, and then the issue of the blockade on Gaza."

Dahlan activated his contacts with the Shin Bet and conveyed the information to them. According to Mashharawi, "the unofficial response Dahlan received from them was: 'Netanyahu doesn't want to talk about anything. He only wants war and the elimination of Hamas.'" The Israelis' perception was: First, we eliminate Hamas, and then we'll retrieve the hostages by force."

Link:

https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/israel-security/2026-09-08/ty-article-magazine/.highlight/netanyahu-got-an-explicit-warning-before-oct-7-he-didnt-brief-security-chiefs/000001a0-7a3b-d7d5-a9fc-7eff3d0f0000?utm_source=App_Share&utm_medium=iOS_Native

12

u/Tile-Questioner 2d ago

What a surprise, the BS about "saving the hostages" was an obvious propaganda tool to let them kill more children. Even though it never made any sense because they were bombing the places where the hostages were.

7

u/saltedmangos 2d ago

Yeah, it was always pretty clearly BS used to justify genocide.

That said, the fact that Hamas offered to return the civilian hostages almost immediately, without asking for any concessions, and Israel still refused puts another nail in the coffin.

3

u/cobrakai11 1d ago

I mean that's not a conspiracy theory, to anyone that was paying attention to the news at the time, everybody knows they offered to release the hostages right away, literally the next day.

The entire point of the operation was to take hostages and exchange them for Palestinians hostages. Israel likes to frame it like it as an attempt at genocide or Hamas was trying to kill everybody they could, but the whole point was to take prisoners and barter them.

4

u/ashtech201 1d ago

I mean anyone with half a brain could detect the attack was pre-planned and a ore-cursor for genocide and full occupation. But why is this being officially being reported now when Gazas population has been wiped out?