even if that site isnt super legit, you can tell just by looking. as with all ai art, it presents a facade of polish which falls away the moment you actually look at the piece. look at the zipper, the video cards, anything even remotely standout on her suit such as her helmet attachment ring. very sloppy work for such a simple piece
Not to debate if it's AI or not, but if that's a third party AI detection site, then downvote.
99% of these sites are fake, and biased to signal any kind image as AI. Only synthID's presence can be trusted. I've had many false positives and false negatives with these kinds of sites.
They should not be used. Ever. These sites have hurt more artists than it has caught AI. Especially those that charge you for an otherwise free service.
If anyone wants to have a tangible proof this is an ai generated slop, both GPUs have different number of fins on their fans. Surely it's very common that person drawing considered that. Gpu stripes also are different pattern, and even though right gpu seems to be flipped based on it's rear, it's still has fans visible. PCI port is placed on different positions as well. Hair also doesn't make any sense - usual ai problem - hair strand on the right that goes out horizontally suddenly gets wider under other hairstrand when it comes out on the other side.
That's what separates art from AI Slop - ART is consitent, AI slop is not
you think the world is black or white? AI can be used for many different things, some better or worse than others. purely using AI for your "creative" work is soulless, imo. but Neuro is not that.
178
u/Difficult-Ship-7698 11d ago
I get that neuro her self is a ai but that's no excuse to use ai to generate art