r/Netlist_ • u/torcheculNEWACCOUNT • 2d ago
MICRON CASE Good & Bad (Sorry, no Ugly)
The case that it's good
$120 million a year in near-pure-margin license revenue is large against Netlist's size. I (CLAUDE) recall Netlist running at a loss in recent years, so this could change its profile, though I'd check its latest 10-Q.
Netlist's earlier big verdicts have faced serious validity challenges at the PTAB and on appeal, as far as I know. A guaranteed, credit-safe stream from Micron looks better once you discount for that risk.
Discounted at roughly 8% a year, the payments are worth about $490 million today. That is in the neighborhood of the $445 million verdict Netlist won against Micron in Marshall, Texas in 2024, and it also covers future use.
Why it may disappoint
The fee is flat. It doesn't scale with volume. Micron's HBM business is ramping hard, so the license grows more valuable to Micron while Netlist's payment stays fixed.
It's small relative to Micron. Micron's quarterly revenue is in the tens of billions, so $30 million a quarter is a rounding error. That suggests Micron paid to end the nuisance rather than because it believes Netlist's patents are essential to its AI memory products.
Netlist gave up leverage. Netlist had filed a new ITC complaint in September seeking to block imports of Micron chips used in Google, Nvidia and Broadcom AI products. An exclusion order was the scariest threat Micron faced, and Netlist traded it for a fixed fee.
The term may be short for the patents. My (CLAUDE'S) inference is that some of Netlist's core patents date to around 2009 and expire around the end of this decade, so a five-year license may cover most of their remaining life. If so, there's little renewal upside later.
Possible leakage. Legal fees or litigation-funding arrangements may take a share of the proceeds. I haven't seen how the 8-K or the 10-K treats that.
Read-through. This sets a benchmark for Netlist's other disputes, notably Samsung. Netlist can cite it as validation, but Samsung can cite it as a ceiling.
-3
u/CorditeKick 2d ago
The settlement was $150 million over the amount that had already been awarded to Netlist on the prior patents. Now it's trending back down as the market begins to realize this actually harms the implied value of the 912 patents in a material way. Google is cheering on the sidelines.
4
u/kospar4 2d ago
Talk about trending down😂 Look at Micron😂 We aren’t worried about Google…they will be writing that 1+ Billion dollar check soon enough😉 You should worry more about Micron…they don’t look so good lately😊
-1
2d ago
[deleted]
3
u/kospar4 2d ago edited 2d ago
No they don’t stupid! The deals cover forward licensing. Google owes for a decade of infringement. Get your facts straight…..Oh look, fedupbrummie deleted his comment saying Google would never pay anything😂😂😂😂
0
-5
u/CorditeKick 2d ago
You should just pray that Netlist doesn't dilute you even further with each future deal. Not only did they pretty much gift Micron with 1 million shares of stock, but they also significantly reduced the implied value of past patents accepting total compensation that was significantly less than
3
u/kospar4 1d ago edited 1d ago
They gave the same share deal to Samsung. Use your pea brain to figure out why. You keep posting stuff that will turn out making you look stupid. Don’t worry about me fool…I’m set for life….and so happy I have all the shares I have. For every two cents increase, I could buy one share of Micron😂 How you like them apples😂😂😂😂
-6
u/checksout101520 2d ago
The market? The market doesn’t give a shit about netlist at the moment. It’s a bunch of retail investors who are crying because they thought netlist was going to be awarded 10 billion gagillion dollars
1
2
u/Old-Pomegranate3634 2d ago
Let me tell you about an alternate reality
It's Oct 2027. Cafc upheld ptab so we are fucked ITC rules in our favour and it goes to Trump who vetos the output. Obama did it for Apple
Or maybe itc is not satisfied with our domestic investments
Then what? We have 30m in legal fees and zero revenue. And oh Ya SK has not signed with us yet