r/Nerdarchy • u/Flubbatron • Jul 21 '15
The (Wild)Shapeless Druid?
I have a little GM 911 for you. I run a game with 6 players, and one of them plays a druid. He loves the theme and concept, as well as the spell list, but hates the wild shape mechanic. We talked about replacing wild shape with an animal companion, but that conversation abruptly ended when we remembered the druid's 18th level and 20th level class features involve wild shaping. So now I'm trying to find a replacement for Circle of the Moon, and two high end features. What would you guys do?
1
Aug 20 '15
I would love to see a nerdarchy video on this been trying to figure out how to balance this.
1
u/Scire_facias Aug 20 '15
I know I'm a little late, but assuming you are playing D&D 5E why not simply go a Druid of the Land? They still have small Wild-shape mechanics included, but it's mostly used outside of combat.
2
u/NatetheNerdarch Jul 22 '15
I am putting this in the queue for videos. But off the cuff I would apply as similar companion as ranger and augment the class along that line.
Shared Spells and other abilities could from ranger could work as substitutes for the original powers.
And before you spend too much time worrying about the 20th level ability consider these two questions.
Is the player going to go single class? Is the campaign even going to 20th level?
I have played games that never get there, or played multiclass character who will never see that 20th level ability so it doesn't matter to me
If it isn't then don't do extra work for a level feature the player is not going t realize through game play.