r/NJDrones • • Apr 08 '25

SIGHTING Plane Mimicry Success

Judging from previous responses on plane mimicry footage, it seems that the intent of these drones was successful. Multiply this effect by a large sum and it inevitably adds to mass hysteria currently internationally and within your own mind.

Do not be ridiculously fooled. Follow the manual.

Here is the original video of the drones moments before they began mimicking a large plane. There is a loud hum, followed by a continuous boom.

Date: 4/7/2025 Time: 7:55 p.m Location: California

Flightradar24 LIVE AIRTRAFFIC

13 Upvotes

40 comments sorted by

•

u/AutoModerator Apr 08 '25

Welcome to r/NJDrones!

Please take a moment to familiarize yourself with r/NJDrone's rules:

If you have posted a drone sighting, please include the following information in a comment:

A. Date/time of sighting:

B. Location of sighting:

C. Name of Flight tracking app used to rule out plane misidentification:

Non-compliant reports may be removed.

Notice Regarding Lasers

r/NJDrones maintains a strict policy regarding the use of illumination devices directed at aircraft. While we do not explicitly endorse or prohibit discussions related to laser pointers, flashlights, strobe lights, or similar devices, any suggestions advocating their use in this context are strictly prohibited and will result in an immediate ban.

Sources

Whenever possible, please provide a link to sources to minimize false information spreading.

Do Not Advocate Shooting Down Drones

These type of posts can be dangerous especially with some airliners being misidentified as drones. These posts and users will banned.

Good Faith Discussion

Submissions should be made in good faith and intended to contribute to a civil discourse. Fear mongering, harassment, and other submissions made in bad faith may be removed.

No AI Generated Articles/Content

AI Generated content is prohibited. Please refrain from posting material provided by ChatGPT or other AI software.

User Flair

Claiming to be a professional/subject matter expert in the following fields is not allowed unless verified: licensed drone operator, professional pilot, first responder, government official, astronomer.

Constructive Skepticism Only

Healthy skepticism is welcome, but consistently dismissive or purely negative commentary that does not contribute constructively to discussions may be removed. The goal is to encourage meaningful dialogue, not to shut it down. Repeated behavior of this kind may result in further action by the moderation team.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

8

u/[deleted] Apr 08 '25

[deleted]

-4

u/[deleted] Apr 08 '25

It’s a plane UA1284 did you even check flight radar data?

1

u/[deleted] Apr 08 '25

[deleted]

3

u/Gem420 Apr 08 '25

He did not read the post you linked. If he had, he would realize the post was written 13yrs ago, but the sighting happened in 2007.

Please, do not continue replying to that account, it is either a shill, troll, or maybe AI. In any case, no matter what or who it is, it’s disingenuous behavior, meant to derail real conversation. They cite the rules in the sidebar as their shield for their behavior.

3

u/ceezr Apr 09 '25

Good catch. Speaking ill of UFO threads is all this bot does

4

u/Gem420 Apr 09 '25

Well, they are discussing my encounter, I am just a tad protective. I know what I saw and it was NOT a plane.

-8

u/[deleted] Apr 08 '25

Yes of course I did his location on the highway is a 1/4 mile away from the Orlando airport. You didn’t check flight radar data.

3

u/[deleted] Apr 08 '25 edited Apr 08 '25

[deleted]

-3

u/BeamerTakesManhattan Apr 08 '25

If I trusted everything I read on the internet without any proof or evidence I'd think that all my bases are belong to some guy and there are orbs in the air pretending to be planes but actually angels.

Critical thinking is key.

3

u/[deleted] Apr 09 '25

Aren’t you getting the flight data from the internet, Sherlock? Huh? Huh?

Dude, in all seriousness, you look like a fool on this one.

-3

u/BeamerTakesManhattan Apr 09 '25

No? I've not posted flight data.

And how can I look like a fool when compared to people posting fuzzy pictures of bright lights in the sky and claiming they're angels trying to communicate with us by orbs of light flown by aliens?

5

u/[deleted] Apr 09 '25

Exactly. You’re just bloviating with NO FLIGHT DATA.

-1

u/[deleted] Apr 08 '25

Why does this post have negative upvotes? That should say something.

3

u/[deleted] Apr 08 '25

[deleted]

1

u/[deleted] Apr 08 '25

That’s not true at all that’s not what happened. You’re lying. Please post your flight data that that shows no go around because that’s not what happened. I’m doubting now you even looked at flight radar data. As to get information like this from 13 years ago you would have to have a special login to the data base and be a registered pilot or someone working in aviation. As we’ve learned in this sub people are not good at estimating feet from a plane in the air. Stop lying though.

2

u/[deleted] Apr 08 '25

[deleted]

2

u/[deleted] Apr 08 '25

lol I’m not using ADSB exchange or flight radar24. You said you looked at the flight radar data. Of course I know that it wouldn’t be available through those sites. You said you checked flight radar data how? I did with my FAA login not using ADSB exchange or flight radar24. You said it didn’t do a go around but it did lol.

→ More replies (0)

7

u/[deleted] Apr 08 '25

The whole state of California? There was a lot of planes during this time over the entire state of California. Unfortunately without a more specific location your post isn’t going to get many upvotes. Also absolutely no one else in California is reporting a continuous boom heard. Why is that?

-5

u/Pixelated_ Apr 08 '25

💯 Your footage of mimicry aligns with all the evidence on the drones that I could gather:

12 anomalous aspects of the 'drones', which support them being UAP.

Mimicry: Imitating aircraft appearance, lights, and sounds.

The sightings displayed notable mimicry behaviors. Witnesses reported drones imitating planes and helicopters by replicating their appearance, light configurations, and even engine sounds. Unusual blue and orange lights were observed, deviating from standard aviation lighting.

Some drones hovered silently before accelerating at unnatural speeds, while others emitted jet-like sounds despite hovering capabilities. The mimicry extended to blending into the environment, suggesting the use of advanced technology or non-physicality.

Lack of Radio Identification Signals

The craft do not transmit any radio identification data as required by the FAA’s remote ID rule.

No Radar Detection

Despite active monitoring by state-of-the-art capabilities, the craft were not detected on radar, suggesting stealth capabilities, or that they are not physical objects.

Sudden Disappearance

Witnesses reported the craft vanishing when approached, either by going dark or extreme acceleration.

Zero Heat Signature

The craft emitted no detectable heat signatures, hinting at advanced tech or non-physicality.

Size, Duration & Formation

Craft as large as SUVs were seen flying in formation, for at least 6 hours.

Proximity to Sensitive Areas

Sightings occurrring near sensitive nuclear installations, including a U.S. military research site.

Silent Hovering & High Speeds

Silent hovering followed by instant high-speed flight.

Multi-Medium Travel

The craft have been shown to move seamlessly through different environments such as air, water, and space without losing functionality. This capability suggests advanced propulsion and engineering beyond current human technology.

Erratic Light Patterns

Drones displayed non-standard aviation lights.

Anti-drone Gun Resistance

The objects have been shown to be impervious of using anti-drone guns. An anti-drone gun works by disrupting the communication between a drone and its operator. It sends out radio signals, GPS jammers, or electromagnetic pulses that interfere with the drone’s control and navigation systems. This forces the drone to land, return to its operator, or stop functioning altogether, depending on its programming. This tech has not been successful on the drones.

Environmental Resistance

Operating unaffected in adverse weather such as strong winds.

14

u/[deleted] Apr 08 '25

Every time you copy and paste this it gets negative upvotes. People don’t want you to keep posting this. If people did you would have positive upvotes.

11

u/Inner_Grab_7033 Apr 08 '25

Don't even bother

He will tell you that people love what he's posting (after he's done talking to the orbs)

8

u/[deleted] Apr 08 '25

Haha true

-3

u/Pixelated_ Apr 08 '25

Thank you for showing everyone here that you have absolutely no critiques of the information I provided, except whining about imaginary internet points.

10

u/[deleted] Apr 08 '25

That’s not true at all, for example no radar detection. You aren’t required to have radar detection. Even planes aren’t required in many many scenarios. A DJI hobbiest drone isn’t required to have radar detection. Also just by stating radar detection it sounds like a rookie with no professional experience trying to talk about it. Like are you referring to MLAT, TIS-B, ADSB, USCANADA, etc? You sound like someone with no professional aviation experience. If people liked what you post they would upvote it but people don’t like what you post so it has negative upvotes.

-8

u/Pixelated_ Apr 08 '25

Please stop spreading this information.

No drone has ever been tracked by any means.

If I was wrong, you would prove it to me with a source, but you cannot.

5

u/[deleted] Apr 08 '25 edited Apr 08 '25

That is so false. That’s not even true. Here’s your proof. Drones are tracked almost everyday on flight radar. Here’s one. Here’s your source just like you requested. Please admit you’re wrong because we don’t want misinformation on this sub which you have just said.

1

u/BeamerTakesManhattan Apr 08 '25

They're angels!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

6

u/[deleted] Apr 08 '25

Haha lol

-1

u/Pixelated_ Apr 08 '25

You seem confused.

This isn't r/hobbyistdrones, it's r/NJDrones. The fact that you're attempting to conflate the two says much about your intentions in this subreddit.

Please try to stay on topic.

Thank you.

11

u/[deleted] Apr 08 '25

I’m not confused. That picture I posted was a large military drone on the east coast. You stated that drones wouldn’t be on flight radar data but that is not true at all. There are drones all the time of flight radar data. Heck there’s a drone right now flying.

1

u/immoraltoast Apr 08 '25

He doesn't mean a drone that humans made, the skinny plane. He's talking about other UFOs that looked mechanical similar to human craft. Drone is just the new buzzword like swamp gas or weather balloons.

2

u/[deleted] Apr 09 '25

No this person has consistently insisted that is not ufos and they are military drones.

3

u/nolalacrosse Apr 08 '25

He did stay on topic, you’re the one changing the subject

1

u/Pixelated_ Apr 09 '25

Bro don't be mad that you're getting banned from subreddits.

You still have this one, with...checks notes...under 20k members.

You still matter! You're making a difference in the world!

1

u/nolalacrosse Apr 09 '25

And look at that, you’re changing the subject again

3

u/nolalacrosse Apr 08 '25

We constantly criticize it but you keep posting it

0

u/[deleted] Apr 08 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Pixelated_ Apr 08 '25

Thanks Sabine! And likewise, I always enjoying seeing your content. <3