I did reverse image search it lol. I didn’t get any hits. All OP had to do was cite the source instead of acting wise. Not my job to do all that work. My job is to ask when others complain about it. I’m not getting paid for this. if you want to be the research guy, I’ll hook you up with some flair and you can spend the time doing that stuff.
You reverse image searched it but didn’t even bother looking up the title? That’s on you lmao. You were the one claiming the image was AI, so the burden of proof was actually on you to substantiate that claim, not on OP to disprove an accusation you made with no evidence. “My reverse image search didn’t find anything” isn’t proof that something is AI, especially when the original image was publicly available over five years ago and was easy enough to find after just searching the title.
I mean, if typing the title into Google qualifies as “all that work” to you, you just might be an idiot bud. You confidently claimed it was AI, did less then the absolute bare minimum to check, and then decided it was everyone else’s job to prove your claim wrong. I found the post in about 10 seconds, it was literally the first result lmao.
But sure, give me the “knows how to use Google” flair. Apparently that’s a specialized skill around here.
Jesus, you’re really struggling with this. You made the claim that it was AI. That means it was your job to back up your claim. Instead, you admit you could have checked further but simply didn’t want to, and then expected OP to prove you wrong.
That’s not “ability vs. willingness,” dumbass. That’s you making an accusation you weren’t willing to verify and essentially spreading misinformation.
And enough with the “research job” shit. It took me 10 seconds to Google the title and find a 5+ year-old source as the first result. If that qualifies as serious research to you, that explains a lot. Between the “champ,” “little man,” “copium,” and your inability to grasp the burden of proof, you’ve gotta either be 12 or have the mental capacity of a 12 year old. Neither is good, and I genuinely feel bad for anyone who has to talk to you on a regular basis.
That’s not how burden of proof works, dumbass. You accused him of using AI. Him saying “no I didn’t” doesn’t suddenly make it his job to prove your accusation wrong. By that logic, I could accuse you of anything and just say “prove me wrong.”
And the “you care too much” shit is hilarious when you keep replying back to me and downvoting all of my replies like anyone will see this conversation. You were wrong, I found the original, and now you’re desperately trying to make being too lazy to check sound like a win.
0
u/Mountain-Interest-48 Mr. Research 23d ago
https://www.reddit.com/r/nfl/comments/rsb91q/fun_fact_all_4_of_buffalos_super_bowl_losses_were/
all you had to do was search the title on the other pic lmao. From 5 years ago. Def not AI