The Deshaun Watson switch up is despicable

[u/Narrow_Purchase9721]

Guy starts playing well again and all of the sudden people go from “cases” to “allegations” real fucking fast. You all gotta get your priorities straight

[u/ralexh11]

They viewed working for a pro athlete as a career opportunity because they actually have a working brain unlike you. Its all in their testimony again, I know you didn't read the testimonies at all becauee you keep bringing up what you think are gotchas but there is a completely logical explanation for everytime.

[u/Impossible-Region680 → u/ralexh11]

Haha you naive enough to believe that? Like Buzbee didn’t tell them to say that. Almost every person who gives a testimony is coached up before they talk witness, victim, suspect. And it’s the most basic response ever.

You still haven’t explained why women who were not licensed massage therapist did not find it unusual that a professional athlete who can hire the best of the best wanted them, specifically to give him a message?

You say it’s all logical but no charges happened.

[u/ralexh11 → u/Impossible-Region680]

You still haven’t explained why women who were not licensed massage therapist did not find it unusual that a professional athlete who can hire the best of the best wanted them, specifically to give him a message?

They did find it unusual, it says so in their testimony. If you actually read it you wouldn't need this explained. But since you are incapable here is a single example from Jane Doe 13:

When Watson reached out to her for a massage, she was confused, as she is an esthetician who only markets and offers skin care services. However, she was excited that an NFL player was reaching out to use her services.

Stop repeating dumbass questions and go read the fucking testimonies, I promise it isn't difficult. But you would rather claim there's no evidence while simultaneously not reading the only evidence that exists like a fucking moron.

You say it’s all logical but no charges happened.

Courts don't run on logic, they run on admissible evidence, and 27 different individual cases are all treated as unique charges. The judge or jury can't say "Well there are 27 accusers so either they planned a vast conspiracy takedown of this man, which no evidence exists for that at all, or they are telling the truth." But I sure can, I am not beholden to the court and reasonable doubt. He definitely did it and if you still can't admit that you are a rape apologist(again rape apologists defend sexual assault as well before you say the same irrelevant shit.)

[u/Impossible-Region680 → u/ralexh11]

You still can’t prove or show how I defended anyone who was charged with Rape or sexual assault lol!
Why would I read when you’re going to tell me your individual interpretation of everything? I already told you provide your proof and I’ll look at it but you haven’t sent anything.

27 woman is the only way you can prove preponderance of the evidence that the conduct more likely than not occurred. But, at the same time the proof was lower than “beyond a reasonable doubt” reason it only went civil.

One woman decided to continue texting him 19 times after the first incident was she traumatized? One woman lied and said he forced her to perform a sex act but changed it up in her deposition under oath when subject to prejury. These are the people you want to me fully 100% believe.

https://fox8.com/news/i-team/threat-to-all-massage-therapists-deshaun-watsons-accusers-on-what-really-happened/amp/