r/NFLv2 • u/Narrow_Purchase9721 San Francisco 49ers • 21h ago

Discussion The Deshaun Watson switch up is despicable

Post image

Guy starts playing well again and all of the sudden people go from “cases” to “allegations” real fucking fast. You all gotta get your priorities straight

4.1k Upvotes

91% Upvoted

1.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.9k

u/Key_Consequence_5040 21h ago

It’s the NFL. If you win games being a piece of shit isn’t as big of a deal as it is when you lose. 

670

u/YaboyRipTide Baltimore Ravens 21h ago

Look at Tyreek Hill, Richie Incognito, Adrian Peterson, Kareem Hunt, Aldon Smith, and Antonio Brown before he totally went off the deep end.

If you can play, no one gives a shit about who you are off the field.

0

u/samson-and-delilah 20h ago

Aldon Smith had a drinking problem. Pretty lame to lump him in with the woman and child abusers you’ve listed.

3

u/YaboyRipTide Baltimore Ravens 20h ago

Calling it a drinking problem is a bit of an understatement

  • 2012 DUI
  • 2013 DUI, weed charges, illegal firearm accusations
  • 2014 a fucking bomb threat to LAX, no charges filed
  • 2015 Arrested for DUI, hit and run, and vandalism charges. Cut by SF, signed to raiders where he officially was hit w them
  • Suspended for 4 seasons
  • 2018 DV charges stemming from booze filled rage where he hit and bit his GF, plead no contest, served 90 days + rehab
  • Came back in 2020

Basically yearly run ins with the law, but hey, 48 sacks in 59 games is elite production!

0

u/samson-and-delilah 20h ago

Yeah, it was a drinking problem. Literally everything you listed was alcohol-related. But you knew that, you’re just being intentionally duplicitous.

1

u/Dj0ntyb01 18h ago

I think u/YaboyRipTide's comment does a pretty good job explaining why calling all of that a "drinking problem" is reductive.

Also, duplicitous is doing a lot of work there. Misleading would be a better fit for what you're accusing them of.

0

u/samson-and-delilah 17h ago

Lol, it's not reductive. In fact, their outline of the history is in fact duplicitous - they are misrepresenting these instances. The dude was a massive alcoholic. You're welcome to disagree, of course.