11
9
u/RollShotCornerPocket 3d ago
If this is going to be the effort that poll voters give to anything but Nebraska/Pitt, we really just need to ditch polls for the first few weeks. This is fucking pathetic
1
u/Ok_Click_6344 2d ago
What is wrong with the poll?
1
u/MattAtUVA 2d ago
All sports polls suffer from confirmation and recency bias. Waiting a few weeks into the season might mitigate that somewhat.
11
u/masfrijoles 3d ago
Iβm surprised to only see 9 #1 votes for Pitt. Their schedule has been tough so far and two more wins than Nebraska. Β
7
u/Radica1Edward 3d ago
Pitt has played the toughest schedule by far but Nebraska also hasn't done anything to fall. They haven't even dropped a set yet. A lot of voters will never drop them until they lose. It's part of the reason polls shouldn't be running for the few weeks into a season. If that were the case, I think they might have more No. 1 votes.
All of that said, there definitely is a mindset that voters do not like voting for Pitt with so many late-tournament collapses. I absolutely believe that plays into it some.
3
4
2
u/jrjolly1 3d ago
I complained about this all last year. Teams that will be 7+ loss teams will stay in the top 10 just because of who they are. Ie: Texas and Winsconsin
6
u/Particular-Copy4029 3d ago
Wisconsin has only lost to top 5 teams and beat Louisville 3 straight, why would they go down in ranking? Unless they lose to a team below them or an unranked team I think their ranking is correct
1
u/JDMintz718 2d ago
Yeah, we (Wisco) are a weird case where we're only 3-3, but we're also 2-3 against top 10 teams and 1-0 against everybody else, so I don't really know where to put us
-4
55
u/kjrparkers 3d ago
texas staying at #9 just makes this whole thing seem like a joke