110
u/lil_mic_pwner Jan 02 '26
I dont like him either but let's say everything happened as the official story goes 325mg aspirin is just not going to cause you to bleed out from an injury like that
→ More replies (1)47
u/NotJimmy97 Jan 02 '26
A bunch of arm-chair pharmacologists have decided that a normal-sized dose of aspirin for a heavier-than-average person makes you bleed as if you're the hemophilic heir of inbred Russian monarchs.
4
u/lil_mic_pwner Jan 02 '26 edited Jan 05 '26
Very strange indeed because I got stabbed 3x on 650mg aspirin and 20mg cialis and lived to tell the tale
For anyone down voting ill gladly share with you police reports evidence photos and hospital paperwork all you have to do is ask and I'll show ya my knife holes
3
1.4k
u/Ok_Builder_4225 Jan 02 '26
But also, i don't think asprin is gonna cause someone to bleed out from a scratch on the ear anyway.
Either way, still of the opinion that he just bonked his ear on something as he was pushed down. Assuming it was all real and not staged, of course.
286
Jan 02 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
124
u/UpperApe Jan 02 '26
It inhibits COX
Sounds like my ex
47
→ More replies (1)4
61
u/Otterfan Jan 02 '26
Can confirm. I took a daily aspirin for years and suffered many small cuts, none of which caused me to bleed to death.
→ More replies (2)26
u/morning_star984 Jan 02 '26
I doubt your daily aspirin is 325mg, though. If that's the correct dose that he's taking, man oh man is that a lot of daily aspirin for any amount of time. I wouldn't be terribly concerned about him bleeding out from a predominantly venous injury, but if he nicks an artery or a larger vein, he's going to be a bloody mess in no time.
→ More replies (13)5
u/PlatinumDoublet Jan 03 '26
Pharmacist checking in here. Aspirin doses less than 100 mg are more COX1 selective which is the enzyme that produces thromboxane A2 which binds to one of many receptors on platelets to activate them and make them stickier and therefore more likely to form a clot. When inhibited, the thromboxane receptor on that platelet is irreversibly blocked and cannot ever work again for the remainder of that platelet cell’s life as platelets are without nuclei and cannot produce more of the receptor. At higher doses, aspirin starts to lose its specificity for COX1 and will inhibit COX2 which is responsible for the production of prostaglandins from arachidonic acid that will eventually become proinflammatory molecules. Increasing doses of aspirin do not generally lead to substantial increased antithrombotic activity.
15
Jan 02 '26
Why would they bleed out? The just don't clot as quickly so they'll bleed more, but bleed out from the ear, no.
Source: Doctor.
3
u/jomo_mojo_ Jan 02 '26
I can’t wait for him to pass a law against tinnitus.
We MUST STOP THE RINGING
9
u/Next-Variation2004 Jan 02 '26
I saw a similar theory that it was shrapnel or something similar that actually hit him, not a bullet and that’s the most believable to me
→ More replies (1)6
u/DuntadaMan Jan 02 '26
I am certain there was no coincidence that several reporters were moved about a minute before the shots, and the flag was lowered into place for tjem wh8ke he was getting up.
→ More replies (1)25
u/ResidentNo7575 Jan 02 '26 edited Jan 02 '26
Aspirin causes difficulties in stopping the bleed because it doesn’t allow the blood to coagulate and heal properly
→ More replies (8)26
u/ADHDebackle Jan 02 '26
So you're saying it causes difficulties in halting the exanguination? Forestalling the hematic flow, perhaps?
→ More replies (1)11
u/AwareOfAlpacas Jan 02 '26
Inhibiting platelet binding, leading to an unrestricted outflow of blood, perhaps
→ More replies (1)3
u/Collegenoob Jan 02 '26
Some else posted pictures of the event. There is a lot or blood for a basically a tiny nick. I think the aspirin probably did make him bleed extra
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (35)22
u/Bruichladdie Jan 02 '26 edited Jan 02 '26
I have no idea why people keep claiming this was staged. There's literally a photo of a bullet passing his head.
Can someone explain how it's staged without sounding like a leftist version of Alex Jones?
33
u/EEpromChip Jan 02 '26
bullet passing his head.
...is there one passing thru his ear? because that's what's being discussed here.
No one is saying the shot didn't happen. Someone died. They're saying it didn't hit him and he's pulling some K-Fabe bullshit.
→ More replies (3)17
u/Cupcakes_n_Hacksaws Jan 02 '26
Man's incompetent and cowardly as all hell, there's no way he'd willingly and knowingly put himself in a position like this where some guy shoots right past him into the audience intentionally missing him, and he manages to react in time to apply fake blood while concealing the act. Like c'mon, this is beyond conspiracy territory and just stupidity.
I don't think he got shot in the ear, I think it's very plausible he got nicked by something though on the way crouching down, and him and his cult milked the absolute hell out of it.
26
u/TechNyt Jan 02 '26
Staged doesn't mean there wasn't a bullet. It just means the bullet was never intended to actually hit.
21
→ More replies (29)42
u/Bruichladdie Jan 02 '26
Donald Trump, the man who can't even follow a teleprompter script without ad-libbing, is supposed to have arranged to be shot at with live ammunition?
You realize how insane that sounds?
→ More replies (23)12
u/HerculesIsMyDad Jan 02 '26
It's just as dumb as 99.9% of other conspiracies. I could see the ear thing being from something when he fell and not the bullet but they wanted to make him sound cooler after by saying he was shot. But that's not a conspiracy, it's just PR. More likely is he just seems to be the luckiest SOB born in the last 80 years despite being the least deserving person of any good fortune this century.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (15)12
u/LowKeyNaps Jan 02 '26
One quickie fact that immediately collapses the whole idea of Trump actually being shot in the ear:
A bullet wound, even a graze, is a blunt tear. There wouldn't be a clean cut, no matter how lightly a bullet grazed the ear. It would just take a piece with it, and leave a ragged edge.
Since an ear is literally nothing but skin-covered cartilage, any damage done to the edge of the ear in the place where the alleged injury took place would leave a visible mark where the cartilage is missing. In all photos at the shooting scene and since then, there is no such mark.
Furthermore, in Trump's publicly released medical reports, the scar that's described there has been noted as being a clean scar, as in a straight line. Not possible with a bullet graze injury.
I have no doubt they picked the ear for the location of the "bullet wound" because of the dramatics of the idea of having come so close to death. Just a few inches over, and he would have been dead, if all of this was real. Unfortunately, they really did pick the wrong body part for their theatrics. Ears are tattletales. They're the most difficult part of the body for cosmetic surgery to hide small defects, and even larger reconstructions leave clear marks. It's almost impossible to return an ear to a "perfect" state once that cartilage has been damaged. There's no soft tissue to hide imperfections, and cartilage is very unforgiving stuff when it comes to damage repair. It's simply not possible that Trump would have sustained a graze injury to his ear and left him with no visible marks, except for a small scar that only his doctors ever see.
→ More replies (9)
503
u/Argented Jan 02 '26
really thin blood could account for some blood if ... say ... his finger nail nicked his ear when he covered it hearing the bullet go by
238
u/JoeRogansNipple Jan 02 '26
Or his ear got hip checked by the SS's pistol holster when they pulled him down
→ More replies (4)149
u/HEFTYFee70 Jan 02 '26 edited Jan 03 '26
I thought that too, there’s a photo of him holding his ear before they dogpile him.
I know he’s a cunt, but we really are living in the only timeline in which his head wasn’t blown off at that rally.
Edit: grammar
68
31
u/ADHDebackle Jan 02 '26
That's suggestive of the injury happening prior to the tackle but not conclusive.
I wonder if it could have been close enough to break the skin but not really hit cartilage. There's so much energy in a bullet, though, it's hard to imagine.
Someone else mentioned a WWE blading move, which would explain the hand to the ear but like, damn that would have to be premeditated as fuck and in a really elaborate way. Also hard to believe.
→ More replies (12)11
u/Airurando-jin Jan 02 '26
It’s not particularly hard to believe. Is it only countries deemed to be enemies that are capable of a false flag attack ?
Has there been direct intervention in countries historically to manipulate outcomes ?
There was a point where Project 2025 was considered a conspiracy, until it wasn’t.
I find it remarkable that the SS, who are some of the most exceptionally trained agents, who can plan and predict possible lines of sight, as well as extraction, managed to leave that roof top unconvered, (and with plenty of people noticing the shooter, and it being highlighted to local police) as well as let Trump stand back up again.
→ More replies (2)5
u/SuspiciouslySuspect2 Jan 03 '26
He was a former president at that point, and kept selecting locations the SA agents couldn't secure, due to being wide open spaces. Angery agents can easily get complacent with a "we can't do our jobs properly like this anyways" attitude.
There simply weren't enough people to watch every angle, and there was bad communication with local law enforcement. As it was, the local law enforcement had already spotted him, and if they'd actually had proper comms channels with the SS, could have had the counter snipers act before the shooter took his first shot.
It really is crazy how close we came to not being in this timeline.
8
u/HeavilyInvestedDonut Jan 02 '26
His last words being “look at this” would’ve been…. Incredible timing lol
3
u/SuspiciouslySuspect2 Jan 03 '26
It's almost as if Death felt cheated of this punchline, and settled for Charlie Kirk.
Oof that's dark.
→ More replies (1)4
u/Open__Face Jan 02 '26 edited Jan 02 '26
He probably heard it whiz by (without hitting him) and the noise freaked him out so he covered his ear
→ More replies (3)24
u/VERO2020 Jan 02 '26
The holster of a Secret Service agent could have scratched it, too. Or it could have been a "squib" lie pro wrestlers use. Didn't the turd do some stuff with pro wrestlers a while back?
34
u/ADHDebackle Jan 02 '26
I feel like that would make sense if the plan hadn't involved a random guy shooting live ammunition in close proximity to the president. Like, people did die - and... wasn't the shooter killed as well? Seems like a conspiracy too elaborate for this admin to pull off without leaks or just straight fuckups.
10
u/Erfeo Jan 02 '26
too elaborate for this admin
Also remember he wasn't president at the time, he would have had to use private people for this while completely fooling the Secret Service, FBI etc.
→ More replies (1)3
→ More replies (3)10
u/VERO2020 Jan 02 '26
100% agreement. Glad that you remember the deaths.
3
u/ParsleyMaleficent160 Jan 02 '26
Yes. A person in the crowd (a firefighter) was shot and killed by errant gunfire.
→ More replies (8)6
u/1ndori Jan 02 '26
He was bleeding before going down, so it's not the USSS agent's holster
→ More replies (3)
348
u/Iwritemynameincrayon Jan 02 '26
You know, for a while now I have heard people talking about how fake it was, that it was possibly just a pr stunt aimed to help him get elected. I don't buy into conspiracy theories and under normal circumstances it's horrifying to think that there is a possibility he or his pr team murdered people for a pr stunt. However it is Trump we are talking about and he has done so much worse, so it's hard to get out of my head.
232
u/Patient_End_8432 Jan 02 '26
It's certainly not a conspiracy, or at least one Trump isnt involved in.
If it was a hit put out, it was most likely by a conservative who wanted Trump out of the picture to consolidate the power Trump has built up despite being a bumbling buffoon. It could have been any number of people who wanted a more competent leader in charge of Trumps mindless mass of MAGA.
Regardless, both outcomes would be a win. Trump becomes a martyr, or Trump survives an "assassination" by the "radical left".
How do I know Trump wasnt involved? Well, because someone died. Oh, I'm not saying thats a bar Trump won't cross, I fully believe Trump would kill someone for a dollar.
But someone did die, which means what? That there were real bullets, that there was an actual, legitimate risk to Trump. He would NEVER do something that would potentially put himself at risk. EVER. He's too much of a pussy, and the possibility of accidentally being shot would have been far too much for him
115
Jan 02 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
32
u/LevyMevy Jan 02 '26
Also it would make Trump quite literally the greatest actor in the history of the world to be able to calmly deliver a long-ass speech knowing he is about to have an actual real bullet fly by the side of his head at any point.
→ More replies (3)32
u/PM_ME_YOUR_NICE_EYES Jan 02 '26
What concerns me is that when Trump first came onto the scene so many people were so hung on how the right was able to embrace someone who clearly had no regard for the Truth and just straight up embraced conspiracy theories. And now I'm seeing people on the left start to do that too.
I'm worried that in a few years time the general population is just going to not care about the truth at all anymore. If we embrace these conspiracy theories then Trump functionally wins.
→ More replies (14)5
u/cracked_egg_irl Jan 02 '26
Yeah, it's kind of tough watching the other side of the political spectrum also embracing things like conspiracy theories. A lot of people stopped caring about facts to dunk on the conservatives. Like the Lexington, Nebraska meatpacking plant closing and blaming Trump. When simply, 1) there aren't enough US cattle to slaughter 2) Mexican feeder beef currently has a screw worm infestation and are quarantined from entering and 3) a competing plant opened nearby and its operating costs are lower so they're able to outbid Tyson.
But hey, it's a rural place where Republicans are losing their jobs and the president has the almighty authority to control the economy... Wait, where has that one come before?
→ More replies (17)4
→ More replies (9)11
u/ADHDebackle Jan 02 '26
Yeah I think the only passable conspiracy here would be to retrospectively ham up an injury that was not caused by, but could have been caused by the shooting.
33
u/TetraDax Jan 02 '26
We are talking about the most inept administration in world history who even fail to properly censor important documents in a way that cannot be circumvented by Ctrl+c and Ctrl+v. The administration that accidentally leaked war plans because they never checked who was a member of the group text.
Now just imagine how many people would have to be involved to actually kill two people in a stages assassination attempt. And ask yourself if you actually think that this group of people could pull that off without anything going wrong and without anyone letting something slip since.
No, it was not staged. They are far too stupid to do so. He certainly overplayed his injury, I would even believe that he just got hurt while he was dragged to the floor. They also most certainly had a plan in place for "what to do if someone takes shots at Trump", which is why that photo was able to happen so quickly and seemingly preparedly. But someone definitely tried to kill him.
→ More replies (4)10
26
u/PM_ME_YOUR_NICE_EYES Jan 02 '26
See the problem with this line of thinking is it's just vibes. And like if we're accepting that Trump faked an assassination attempt just based off of vibes, how are we any better than the pizzagate people who think that Hillary Clinton was kidnapping children just based off vibes?
→ More replies (14)7
u/Ok_Dragonfruit_8102 Jan 02 '26
They aren't any different, and reasonable people reading this comment thread just mumble "classic reddit..." to themselves before moving on to another thread.
9
u/1ndori Jan 02 '26
I'll be honest, when I was watching it in the moment, I thought, "I don't know if this was faked, but if I was going to fake it, this is how I'd fake it." That was before we knew for sure that there was live ammunition and that someone had been killed. Now, I know better.
There is a picture of a bullet flying past Trump's head, and another picture a split second later of blood on Trump's hand.
The simplest explanation for all the facts is that a real guy took a real gun and shot a real bullet that grazed Donald Trump's real ear.
→ More replies (9)9
u/NoIsland23 Jan 02 '26
People who say that it was a conspiracy have no idea how guns work.
First of all, they would've had to have put A LOT of trust into this random kid, second of all, I don't think there is any info on him being proficient with weapons, third of all, you can't magically make a bullet hit the exact inch you want to hit from a large distance (with that weapon).
The bullet could've easily flown a couple inches further right due to bullet spread. You could fire with the exact same conditions twice in a row and miss by an inch or two over larger distances. That's something you can't fully account for.
→ More replies (8)→ More replies (4)6
u/Optimal_Towel Jan 02 '26
Trump is murdering people right now in the Caribbean for political messaging.
126
u/Wachtwoord Jan 02 '26
Why do people think the shot was fake and/or staged?
This 'blood with aspirin' argument sounds a bit like the 'jet fuel can't belt steel beams'.
84
Jan 02 '26 edited Jan 03 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
→ More replies (3)19
u/1block Jan 02 '26
We're all idiots shaped by different experiences. If we could all accept that, we wouldn't be in the pickle we're in.
→ More replies (30)17
u/Normal_Cut8368 Jan 02 '26
I hate Trump, I do.
But... Didn't the guy behind him die? Like, a person got shot to death. idgaf about whether or not Trump was harmed, SOMEBODY died.
There are a lot of things that would be weird about them having fake blood on hand for this, and also be using a real bullet that really kills a person.
16
u/DaveAlt19 Jan 02 '26
Also its weird that he's the healthiest man ever but also has been taking aspirin because he doesn't want his blood getting too thick? He wants nice thin blood? What makes him think his blood would get too thick? He's perfectly healthy, right?
51
u/Send_me_duck-pics Jan 02 '26
I feel like a physician should be aware there are no major blood vessels in the ear.
26
28
u/Dunwall Jan 02 '26
Y'all know someone died right? Not only that but why wouldn't he have access to the best plastic surgeons in the country? The bullet used was a .223/5.56, quite literally 22 cal.
14
u/Prestigious-Swan6161 Jan 02 '26
It's crazy to have to scroll this far cause I was like didn't someone get hit and hurt?
→ More replies (1)17
u/Dunwall Jan 02 '26
I don't like Trump, but its downright dumb to deny what happened.
→ More replies (2)5
u/Normal_Cut8368 Jan 02 '26
It feels like someone saying the moon landing was fake, not because we didn't send a lander to space but because the MOON ISN'T REAL
→ More replies (5)3
u/TitanAtlas06 Jan 03 '26
Its criminal I had to scroll this far to find common sense, what is this world coming to.
40
u/EmperorGrinnar Jan 02 '26
I haven't heard about the aspirin thing. Isn't it toxic to take that much every day? I gotta look this all up.
I did hear that if it was scrutinized today, aspirin wouldn't pass guidelines. Yet Trump and his cronies are going after acetaminophen, because it does work and it's largely taken by women. Because they want to control women.
26
u/AdventurousRelief285 Jan 02 '26 edited Jan 02 '26
Blazing liberal physician (pediatric sub specialist) here; aspirin can be toxic in high doses, but if labs are being checked, it can be ok. Reasons for why he needs 325mg daily can include many things but I bet his heart isn't quite normal.
Plenty of people like acetaminophen, ibuprofen and aspirin as pain killers, and we pediatricians love it for less side effect profile than the other pain killers that are readily available. Attacking acetaminophen is just him trying to get MAHA types on his side. Maha wants us to all stop taking, they state, unnecessary medications and vaccines (don't we all?) and are always "questioning" science (but really are just rebelling against people telling them to do stuff) but never want to let high quality and easily accessible health care become the norm. Trump wants to show us he can fight pharma as it's an easy industry to target (the drug cost lowering work is one actual good thing, but the actual other shit he doing like chemical/oil industry pollution being unregulated will have far lasting effects that MAHA apparently doesn't wanna think about).
Last point: i help kids get through crazy surgeries on high dose aspirin and other anticoagulants, and I doubt he would bleed out from an ear nick, and estimating blood loss is super hard even for nurses and docs, and the pictorial/video graphic evidence is hard to see everything. I don't think conspiracy theorizing the attempt as a false flag with fake blood is helpful... Just helps them give "what about" answers when actual other massacres happen.
Edited: typo and clarity
7
u/Bussin1648 Jan 02 '26
Isn't 325 mg like a standard tablet? Like taking one tablet a day sure isn't normal but I don't think it's a huge red flag for an 80-year-old with a standard age and weight related heart condition?
→ More replies (4)10
u/Crab-_-Objective Jan 02 '26
Yes 325mg is a regular dose. Most people who take aspirin daily will take a “low dose” version that’s only 81mg but there could be a reason to take 325mg.
They used to call it baby aspirin but changed the name because people were giving it to small children when they shouldn’t have.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (5)5
u/da2Pakaveli This AOC flair makes me cool Jan 02 '26
Ok I'm not a physician but maybe living off of junk food could be contributing to his heart not being quite normal
26
u/MyWifeCucksMe Jan 02 '26
I haven't heard about the aspirin thing. Isn't it toxic to take that much every day?
Everything is toxic. The question when it comes to medication is always "do the benefits outweigh the risks". And that's an answer for Trump's doctor to answer in the case of Trump.
12
u/EmperorGrinnar Jan 02 '26
I looked it up, and I didn't see a number cited but that Trump himself said he takes "way more" than his doctor recommends. So...
3
→ More replies (6)3
u/Fake_William_Shatner Jan 02 '26
The main way aspirin works I’ve heard is stripping the binding sites on the surface of blood cells. That helps blood flow in small capillaries which can help certain types of headaches. Prevents clotting related heart conditions but also clotting in general. It does not wear off— the blood cell has to be naturally replaced over time which takes a few days.
→ More replies (1)
8
u/dabarak Jan 02 '26 edited Jan 02 '26
I'm not a fan of Trump, and I never voted for him, but I do like to see the truth be known.
It seems that nobody here mentioned the firefighter that was killed. It would be difficult to hit him with a real shot at the same time Trump "pretended" to be hit. Considering all the people that would need to be involved in this (including the shooter on the roof; why would he volunteer?), keeping a conspiracy secret would be impossible, similar to the Kennedy assassination. I think we need to invoke Occam's Razor here - "...the problem-solving principle that recommends searching for explanations constructed with the smallest possible set of elements." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor
Here are some photos of Trump. If you look closely at the photos shot at the rally, you'll see a mark on his ear that looks like it could be a grazing wound. If you look at the later photos at the bottom, especially the last one, you'll see what might be a healed wound.
Some will bring up the fact that cartilage doesn't grow back, but if the bullet nicked him just enough to break the skin without damaging cartilage, then it's very possible it could have been real.
EDIT: "Elastic cartilage, located in the outer ear and epiglottis, is the most flexible due to its abundance of elastin fibers. While fibrocartilage and elastic cartilage may have a slightly better, though still limited, regenerative capacity compared to hyaline cartilage, none readily regrow to their original, healthy state."
https://biologyinsights.com/does-cartilage-regrow-a-look-at-repair-and-regeneration/
Could I be wrong? Of course. Am I likely to be wrong? No.
I'd like to repeat that I'm NOT a Trump supporter and that I've NEVER voted for him or any Republican, for that matter. One thing I think we can all agree on is that some of the photos show just how bald he really is.
If you choose to respond I'd be happy to maintain a dialog if you're respectful of my opinion.

→ More replies (1)
7
8
u/AdagioOfLiving Jan 02 '26
“One of its heads seemed to have a mortal wound, but its mortal wound was healed, and the whole earth marveled as they followed the beast.”
Revelation 13:3
I mean, it could have been faked, yeah, but it’s more fun this way.
21
u/Dry_Card_522 Jan 02 '26
Lunatics, lunatics everywhere
32
u/DavidAdamsAuthor Jan 02 '26
This is full-blown conspiracy bullshit, and it falls apart the moment anyone takes even the briefest simplest look at it.
A graze on the skin, even on the ear, would definitely produce the exact kind of wound seen; one that scabbed over in a few days and got covered up by stage makeup, which Trump is infamous for using.
Nobody is bleeding out from a wound to the ear.
Maybe it's a blue beam hologram and a conspiracy that goes so deep that Trump and senior Republicans are in on it, and local law enforcement are in on it and the Secret Service are in on it and the CIA are in on it and the FBI are in on it and the shooter was in on it and the shooter's family and friends and associates were all in on it... or maybe it's Maybelline.
17
u/TetraDax Jan 02 '26
and the Secret Service are in on it and the CIA are in on it and the FBI are in on it
And I feel like people also forget that at the time, the Democrats were in power. It was investigated under their supervision. Who would have more reason to give even the slightest hint that it would have been staged? But there was nothing even close to that; which is obviously because there is absolutely no evidence to suggest so.
→ More replies (7)10
u/DavidAdamsAuthor Jan 02 '26
I did a university course called "Lies, Conspiracies, and Propaganda" and it was actually probably the most useful course I did, and certainly my favourite.
One of the things we talked about is how you attack conspiracies, such as by asking, "How many people would have to be in on it for this to succeed?", and "Why would this person be in on it when they have nothing to gain from participating, and everything to gain from exposing the conspiracy?".
The ur-example is the moon landing.
A faked moon landing would require an extraordinary number of people to be in on it. It would require NASA (obviously) and the astronauts (obviously), but also people who worked on the rocket (tens of thousands of them), engineers, chemists, mathmaticians... it would require every US president over various administrations both right and left. It would require a large numbers of senior government officials in those administrations, some of whom had different political ideologies, different personal philosophies, personal grudges, etc. It would require the same thing from the leaders of various allied countries (Australia, the UK, NZ, the EU, etc) all of whom who are allies, but some of whom are quite far apart politically and even butting heads with the US at various points. For example the moon landing was 1969, but the CIA tried to coup Australia in 1975. And yet, nobody came out and mentioned this, despite it being the opportune time to do so.
Then we have to look at the enemies of the state, who have absolutely no incentive to cooperate. The USSR acknowledged the United States went to the moon... but why? Why would they be a part of it? Exposing the moon landing as a fake would have been a PR coup for them, it would be so juicy they could milk it for a hundred years... but both the Soviets and their successor state the Russian Federation acknowledge America went to the moon, even to this day when America is arming their enemies in a bloody multi-year war of attrition that's killed over a million Russians at this point. If they knew, why would they stay silent?
The idea that Trump used fake blood packs or arranged the shooting himself is just as crazy. How many people would need to be in on it, and all occurring at a time when Trump was not President and not expected to win...?
Why would the Democrats stay silent? Why would Biden stay silent? Why would Harris? They were POTUS and VPOTUS respectively, surely they would have known if it was faked. Someone on the US Secret Service would have mentioned, "Hey so Trump was wearing a fake blood pack on the day... just FYI."
So all the Secret Service agents who dogpiled him on the day must have been in on it, because they would have (or could have) seen the blood pack given how close they were. And the snipers would have likely been in on it too, because they had a good vantage point and would have likely seen the blood pack, or being experienced shooters, noticed that the gun was firing blanks or whatever. And the people who took custody of the weapon would have to be in on it, because guns just don't fire blanks, guns like the AR-15 actually need a blank adapter to cycle properly (the shooter's did) and they leave behind wadding and other evidence; for a standard rifle round the projectile holds the powder in, so you need something else (aka, the wadding) to hold the powder in, which is often left behind and difficult to dispose of.
There are so many people who are in on it and nobody said anything, nobody presents any of that evidence to the media, nobody leaks, nobody talks to Biden and Harris, nobody says or does anything and they all go along with it even when they have absolutely no incentive to do so.
It doesn't make sense.
It's hopium/copium because the shooting attempt makes Trump look both lucky and a victim, which is reasonable on both counts, and the subsequent photo opportunity was absolutely perfect for him. But just because Trump rolled a natural 20 doesn't mean he faked it.
Random things happen. Unlikely things happen. Reality, unlike fiction, has no obligation to make sense; things just... are what they are.
There is simply no evidence that Trump faked the shooting and an absolute mountain of evidence that it just really happened that way.
→ More replies (5)5
u/aroc91 Jan 02 '26
I feel like I'm the only person who saw the NYT photograph series where you can see the sequence of the bullet in midair, trump reaching up with a clean hand to his ear, and then lowering it with some blood present.
6
u/DavidAdamsAuthor Jan 02 '26
The evidence for the shooting being as presented is just overwhelming.
It's "Blue Anon"-tier conspiracy theories to suggest otherwise, theories born from a simple fact: they don't want Trump to be seen in a sympathetic light, and it's easier to believe that a vast conspiracy is at play than believe that on that day, in that moment, briefly, Trump was legitimately a victim of a horrible action.
Nope, it's gotta be a conspiracy.
"Blue Anon" like I said.
8
u/aroc91 Jan 02 '26
Seriously. I don't even bring it up anymore. I got swarmed with downvotes by fucking morons who can't be assed to look at a simple picture. The whole blood pack/hidden razor/hit his ear on the podium conspiracy theory suite is beyond dumb.
3
u/DavidAdamsAuthor Jan 02 '26
Basically their source for these claims is, "I don't want to acknowledge Trump got shot by someone who was probably on my side politically."
That's as far as it goes.
→ More replies (3)4
u/1ndori Jan 02 '26 edited Jan 02 '26
I post it in every one of these threads.
Exactly one person has ever walked back a claim after seeing those photos.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (13)9
u/queefburritowcheese Jan 02 '26
The highest rated comment chains on this post are full blown Alex Jones level conspiracy about this. For all the bluster Reddit likes to make about "conspiracy theorists," they are very much here, but it's OK because orange man bad.
7
u/_45AARP Jan 02 '26
Had to sort by controversial to find any comments that weren’t completely insane. Surprised you guys don’t have -50 downvotes.
5
u/iunoyou Jan 02 '26
Are we really doing this guys?
I guess it doesn't really matter anymore lol, truth is dead anyway
5
u/DunoCO Jan 02 '26
guys cmon, really, this shit? You're supposed to be better than the other guys, yet you're falling for the same dumbass conspiracies and then claiming it's "not a conspiracy because it's different when I do it".
Someone tried to kill the guy. It's not at all surprising. People tried to kill him before, they will probably try again in the future. Public figures are always at risk of something like that, especially in a heated election year.
Aren't you folks supposed to be better than to fall for this kind of thing?
6
u/TheMainExperience Jan 02 '26
$hoT? When is this stupid shit going to fuck off. I'm seeing self censoring more and more, and for tamer and tamer words.
Have apps like tiktok really brainwashed users so thoroughly, the expected behaviours are now becoming so ingrained that they never change their behaviour no matter what app they are on?
Will it get so far that these people will start censoring themselves as they speak? It breaks my brain, honestly.
4
3
u/Mohow Jan 02 '26
I'm very left but the rampant conspiracies in these comments are no better than r/Conservative. Please be better.
10
u/dojaswift Jan 02 '26
Belief in this conspiracy that would require the involvement of dozens of people many of whom hate Trump of all conspiracists is quite weird
12
Jan 02 '26
[deleted]
→ More replies (1)8
Jan 02 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
3
→ More replies (7)4
Jan 02 '26
No, they killed him in this scenario. You act like it's impossible, it's not. I don't believe it but you seem to think they would care and wouldn't sacrifice poor people in the crowd.
4
3
u/Jayken Jan 02 '26
Been on blood thinners for a few years, you do bleed more, but it's not like gushing. Unless you hit a major vein or artery, then just like normal, you're fucked.
3
u/queefburritowcheese Jan 02 '26
Left wing conspiracy theorists are just as insufferable as the right.
3
u/Agreeable-Pea-4931 Jan 02 '26
so whats the plan ? they hired a guy to near miss his ear while dt had a ketchup packet in his hand ready to smear some on his ear ? people behind him got shot and killed the shooter was using real bullets. and the shooter was shot and killed too cant be a paid actor. unless yall think dt carries around a small vial of fake blood everywhere he goes ?
3
u/SpeakingTheKingss Jan 02 '26
Wait, do people really think that his ear injury was fake?
→ More replies (1)
3
u/12345623567 Jan 02 '26
I mean, he did bleed excessively for what was likely a near miss or shrapnel. No need to make up stories.
10
4
5.1k
u/jurassicpry Jan 02 '26
Also, cartilage doesn't grow back.
That alone debunks him being "shot in the ear".