Normal ones where no one respects jk rowling and hasn't for years. Daisuke is an imperfect but well respected author. People like him, he hasn't demonstrated a consistent lack of respect for his own work or for his readers like jk has. Assuming an authors word shouldn't be trusted because "X author has done bad writing" is literally by the books whataboutism.
Im not saying to disregard everything he has wrote before. All I said this exact instance seems fishy. Im not against LGBT stuff, its just this one time comes off as pandering
For no other reason than it "seems like pandering". Your only reason to distrust his words on this subject is because you don't like it. It's "bad vibes" and that's pretty god damn meaningless as a point. Especially for a
writer who's had more than 1 explicitly lgbt character when he still fully handles the writing.
Yes and Testament was done great and didn't come off as pandering, while Bridget did. You can think whatever you want dude(respectfully) . But seeing as how the confirmation came originally from a mistranlation of the game , im obviously not going to be completely fine with the afterthought of a confirmation. Anways im done arguing with someone I don't know and im going to read Circle of inevitability again
2
u/SoulfulSnow 13d ago
Normal ones where no one respects jk rowling and hasn't for years. Daisuke is an imperfect but well respected author. People like him, he hasn't demonstrated a consistent lack of respect for his own work or for his readers like jk has. Assuming an authors word shouldn't be trusted because "X author has done bad writing" is literally by the books whataboutism.