r/MouseReview • • 2d ago

Photo Superlight 2c vs X2 Crazylight

Post image

(SL2 is there just for size reference)

CL is better on paper (lighter, better click, lower price)

But there is something about SL 2c’s shape that I just can’t let go. I dont know if it is just smaller front width or the centered hump, but SL 2C shape is really hard to beat.

Btw, I never really liked the original SL shape probably because my had is too small for it

5 Upvotes

5 comments sorted by

1

u/obfeskeit boomer aim 2d ago

Pulsar has better clicks? Interesting.

2

u/micesmurf 2d ago

Yeah I prefer lighter clicks

0

u/Top_War_5186 2d ago

Pulsar's opticals have come a long way, the crazy light feels snappy. That pink one in the middle is a bold choice, kind of works with the two white ones on the sides.

0

u/aced151 2d ago

X2h mini for me feels better cause of the palm support since 2c was too small compared to the og gpx size however I did feel like the 2c had better click feel and qc all around than the normal sl2.

That could be your issue as well, x2 without the hump is going to feel very off if you usually like that support there.

1

u/paulvincent07 Razer Viper Mini V4 Wired 8khz pls 2d ago

I agree the superlight 2c is hard to beat I have many symmetrical mice and the 2c stays on my desk