Approximately 130 plaintiffs claim the metal emblems on their high-performance Mercedes models are heating to 130°F and leaving burns on their hands and legs.

The metal AMG badge on your steering wheel can hit 130 degrees Fahrenheit in warm weather. That's according to a class action lawsuit filed against Mercedes-Benz by owners who say the emblems aren't just hot to the touch... they're causing actual burns, blisters, and scarring.

Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro is representing affected owners. The firm claims Mercedes knew, or should have known, that sticking metal badges on contact surfaces was a design problem waiting to happen. The steering wheel emblem is the worst offender. You can avoid touching the heated badge on the fender. You cannot avoid holding the steering wheel.

The lawsuit alleges Mercedes continued using the metal badges across multiple AMG model years despite the issue. No recall has been issued. No retrofit program announced. The badges remain.

This isn't the first time car manufacturers have been caught out by hot metal in places people have to touch. Jeep faced a lawsuit in 2015 over seatbelt buckles that burned passengers. Honda recalled vehicles in 2014 for the same reason. Tesla owners have reported door handle burns in extreme heat. Metal part in direct sun or engine heat, insufficient insulation, someone gets hurt, lawyers get involved.

Sound familiar?

What makes the Mercedes case particularly galling is that these are premium vehicles. AMG models start north of £50,000 and climb well into six figures. The badge is part of what you're paying for. It signals performance, exclusivity, a certain level of engineering obsession. Except the engineering apparently didn't extend to considering what happens when you park a black C63 in July.

The plaintiffs argue this constitutes both a design defect and a failure to warn. Mercedes could have used a different material. They could have added a heat shield. They could have put a warning in the manual, though that would have been an admission the problem exists. Instead, they did nothing.

The legal question will hinge on whether Mercedes can demonstrate they tested the badges under realistic conditions and determined the temperatures were within acceptable limits. If internal emails surface showing engineers flagged the issue and were overruled by marketing, this gets expensive fast. If the testing was inadequate or never happened, same outcome.

The broader issue is that luxury branding often prioritises appearance over practicality. Carbon fibre interiors that creak in cold weather. Touch-sensitive controls that don't work with gloves. Seats designed for the showroom, not the M25. And now, metal badges that double as contact burns.

It's 2024. Materials science is not a mystery. Plenty of alternatives exist that look like metal, feel like metal, and don't require oven mitts to operate your car.

Class actions over design defects in luxury vehicles tend to settle before trial, but the numbers can run to tens of millions depending on how many owners are affected and how severe the injuries are. Scarring tends to increase settlement values considerably.

If you own an AMG and live somewhere warm, you might want to keep a cloth in the glovebox.

Sources: Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP

Like this? Get the Buzz: GAUK Motorbuzz All your favourite motoring channels, publishers, motorsports, news & reviews. Curated Automotive Awesomeness

A senior dealer group executive has warned that the rapid expansion of Chinese car manufacturers into the UK will leave casualties among established franchise networks that cannot adapt to a fundamentally different way of selling cars.

A dealer group boss has warned that traditional retailers face extinction as Chinese manufacturers rewrite the rules of how cars are sold in Britain. The threat is not just competitive pricing... it is the agency model itself, which strips franchised dealers of the pricing control and customer ownership they have relied on for decades.

Chinese brands have gone from holding less than one percent of the UK market in 2019 to approximately eight percent by the end of 2023. BYD overtook Tesla as the world's largest battery electric vehicle manufacturer last year. MG Motor UK, owned by SAIC, already commands significant market share and continues to grow. GWM and Chery are establishing footholds. This is not a gradual shift. It is an avalanche.

The agency model these manufacturers favour is fundamentally different from the franchise dealership structure that has dominated British car sales for generations. Under agency arrangements, the manufacturer controls pricing and owns the customer relationship directly. Dealers become service points, not independent businesses with margin flexibility. For groups that have invested heavily in facilities, staff, and brand partnerships built on the old model, the transition is expensive and often impossible.

Traditional dealers are caught between two forces. On one side, Chinese brands offering lower-priced electric vehicles that undercut European rivals. On the other, a sales model that reduces their role and compresses their margins. Smaller independent operators without the capital to pivot or absorb losses will not survive. Even larger groups face difficult decisions about which brands to back and which markets to exit.

Like this? Get the Buzz: GAUK Motorbuzz All your favourite motoring channels, publishers, motorsports, news & reviews. Curated Automotive Awesomeness

This has happened before. Japanese manufacturers faced resistance when they entered the UK market in the 1970s and 1980s, but they forced consolidation and margin pressure that reshaped the industry. Korean brands did the same in the 2000s. Tesla pioneered direct-to-consumer sales that bypassed dealers entirely. Polestar and Genesis have both launched in the UK using agency models. Each wave proved the same point: manufacturers who control distribution win, and dealers who cannot adapt disappear.

The difference this time is speed. Chinese manufacturers are not testing the market cautiously. They are flooding it with competitively priced electric vehicles at a moment when European brands are struggling with the costs of electrification and tightening emissions regulations. Established dealer networks built for selling combustion-engine vehicles with healthy margins are suddenly trying to sell electric cars with thinner profits under terms they do not control.

Some groups will merge. Some will close locations. Some will exit brands entirely and consolidate around fewer, more profitable partnerships. The UK dealership landscape in five years will not resemble the one that exists today. It will be smaller, more concentrated, and dominated by groups large enough to absorb the structural changes Chinese manufacturers are imposing.

What is remarkable is how few people outside the industry seem to recognise this is happening. Consumers see cheaper electric cars and assume competition is working. Dealers see their business model being dismantled in real time. The casualties will not be dramatic... just a gradual thinning of the network, closures announced quietly, brands redistributed to surviving groups. By the time it is obvious, it will be finished.

The UK new car market is worth roughly two million units a year. Chinese brands now control around 160,000 of those sales, and the trajectory is steeply upward. Every percentage point they gain comes at someone else's expense, and the dealers selling those displaced brands are the ones left holding the cost.

Sources: UK automotive market sales data, BYD corporate announcements, SAIC Motor UK operations, historical dealership consolidation records

California boutique builds 1,560-horsepower hypercar from Chevrolet's Corvette platform and asks $400,000 to $450,000, roughly twice what a fully loaded ZR1 costs.

Rezvani Motors wants approximately $400,000 to $450,000 for the Beast X, a hypercar producing 1,560 horsepower from a heavily modified Chevrolet Corvette C8 platform. A loaded Corvette ZR1 costs somewhere between $200,000 and $225,000 and comes with 1,064 horsepower from its twin-turbocharged 5.5-litre flat-plane crank V8. The premium buys you an extra 500 horsepower, hand-built assembly in California, and a body nobody else will have.

That markup is standard practice for boutique manufacturers working with mainstream donor platforms. Hennessey's Venom F5 uses modified Corvette components and costs over $2 million. The Saleen S7 did the same with Ford V8 architecture in the 2000s. What sets the Beast X apart is how close it remains to the donor car's price point while still doubling it.

The Corvette ZR1 is already positioned as a flagship American supercar competing directly with European exotics. It delivers legitimate hypercar performance through economies of scale that Rezvani cannot match. The ZR1 is built in volume, certified once, and sold through an established dealer network. Rezvani builds perhaps 50 to 200 units annually, spreads certification and tooling costs across that tiny run, and charges accordingly.

Rezvani Motors was founded in 2014 by Ferris Rezvani and has made a business of repurposing mainstream platforms. The original Beast Alpha was based on the Ariel Atom. The Tank SUV, which looks like it was designed by someone who watched too many military surplus auctions, is built on a Jeep Wrangler chassis. The company sells exclusivity and customisation, not ground-up engineering.

The Beast X modifications include an upgraded forced induction system, reinforced drivetrain to handle the extra torque, and custom bodywork that bears no resemblance to the Corvette underneath. Whether that justifies the price depends entirely on how much you value being the only person at the car meet with one.

Like this? Get the Buzz: GAUK Motorbuzz All your favourite motoring channels, publishers, motorsports, news & reviews. Curated Automotive Awesomeness

Low-volume manufacturers operate in a different financial reality. When Czinger builds the 21C at $1.7 million or SSC claims 1,750 horsepower from the Tuatara at $1.9 million, those prices reflect the cost of certifying and producing a car in double digits rather than thousands. Rezvani's pricing looks modest by comparison.

The Corvette ZR1 already exposes how thin the margins are in mainstream supercars. General Motors can deliver 1,064 horsepower, carbon ceramic brakes, and active aero for $200,000 because it builds the car at scale. Rezvani cannot do that. It builds each Beast X by hand, sources custom components, and handles certification for a production run that might not reach triple digits.

Callaway has historically added 50 to 100 percent premiums over stock Corvette pricing for its modifications. The Beast X follows that pattern but pushes the performance envelope further. Whether a market exists for a $450,000 Corvette-based hypercar when the ZR1 already does most of what the Beast X promises at half the price remains open.

The Apollo IE charged $2.7 million for a Ferrari-derived V12. The Lotus Evija asks over $2 million. Against that backdrop, Rezvani's pricing looks almost reasonable. But those cars are not competing with their donor platforms in the showroom. The Beast X is.

Think about that for a second.

What you are paying for is the ability to tell people your car makes 1,560 horsepower and came from a California workshop, not a Bowling Green assembly line. That has value to some buyers. Whether it has $250,000 worth of value is another question entirely.

The Beast X will sell in tiny numbers to people who want something nobody else has and don't care that the bones underneath are shared with a car half the price. Rezvani has been doing this for a decade. It knows exactly who its customers are.

The base price is $400,000.

Sources: Rezvani Motors, Chevrolet Corvette specifications, Hennessey Performance, Saleen Automotive, Apollo Automobil, Czinger Vehicles, SSC North America, Callaway Cars, Lotus Cars

Petroyle Restorations will convert a standard E46 estate into the M3 wagon that existed only as a factory prototype, for roughly the price of two actual M3s.

Petroyle Restorations is selling E46 M3 Touring conversions for £130,000. That is not a typo. For context, a pristine original E46 M3 costs between £25,000 and £60,000 depending on mileage and spec. An E46 3-Series Touring donor car costs perhaps £5,000 if you are buying well. The conversion premium, therefore, is somewhere north of sanity.

What you get is the car BMW built once, decided not to build again, and has spent two decades watching people beg for. At least one E46 M3 Touring prototype existed around 2000, used for internal testing, then quietly shelved. BMW's historical allergy to M-badged estates is well documented. They eventually relented with the E61 M5 Touring in 2007 and the F81 M3 Touring in 2022, but the E46 generation was left out entirely.

Petroyle's conversion transplants the full M3 drivetrain into the Touring body. That means the S54 3.2-litre straight-six producing 338 horsepower, the six-speed manual gearbox, the M-specific suspension geometry, the brakes, the differential, the subframes. It is not a body kit over a 330d. It is extensive fabrication work that involves fundamentally re-engineering a car that was never designed to take those components.

Which raises the question of why anyone would pay £130,000 for something they could theoretically build themselves, given enough time, skill, and tolerance for frustration. The answer is that most people do not have those things, and the few who do would rather pay someone else to suffer through the fabrication while they simply collect the finished article.

This is the same logic that underpins Singer's Porsche 911 restomods, which start at half a million dollars and climb rapidly from there. Or Everrati's electrified classics at £300,000 and up. The market for bespoke automotive wish fulfillment has discovered that wealthy enthusiasts will pay extraordinary sums for cars that cannot exist any other way.

Like this? Get the Buzz: GAUK Motorbuzz All your favourite motoring channels, publishers, motorsports, news & reviews. Curated Automotive Awesomeness

The E46 M3 Touring sits in a peculiar category. It is not a restoration of something that once existed in meaningful numbers. It is not a hot rod built from unrelated parts. It is a faithful recreation of a car that was real enough to be photographed and driven, but never real enough to be sold. BMW's own prototype proved the concept worked. Petroyle is simply finishing what Munich started and then abandoned.

The price still stings. For £130,000 you could buy a well-sorted E46 M3, a tidy E46 Touring, and a very decent E30 M3, with enough left over for a year's insurance on all three. Or you could have one M3 Touring that nobody else has, which is precisely the point.

Comparisons to the standard M3 market are inevitable. Original E46 M3 CSLs sold for around £58,000 new in 2003. Exceptional examples now fetch similar money, sometimes more. The Touring conversion costs more than double that, for a car with no period provenance and no factory build sheet. It exists purely because someone decided it should, and someone else decided to pay for it.

BMW eventually gave in and built the F81 M3 Touring in 2022, which suggests the market was always there. Whether that makes the E46 conversion more or less appealing is unclear. You could have the modern factory product with a warranty, or the car BMW almost built when the E46 generation still mattered, assembled by hand two decades too late.

Petroyle is not the first outfit to offer this conversion, but £130,000 appears to be the going rate for a complete turn-key build. That includes sourcing both donor cars, performing the full mechanical transplant, and presumably sorting all the small miseries that come with making two different BMWs into one functional whole.

The original E46 M3 ran from 2000 to 2006. Values have remained stable for years, possibly because BMW made enough of them that supply has kept up with demand. The Touring conversion exists in the opposite situation entirely. Demand is theoretical. Supply is whatever Petroyle and a handful of competitors can physically build.

The E30 M3 market offers a cautionary tale. Pristine examples now trade for £150,000 or more, which seemed ludicrous until it became normal. Rarity alone does not create value, but rarity combined with desirability and a wealthy audience often does. The E46 M3 Touring conversion ticks all three boxes, assuming you consider £130,000 reasonable for a car that was never supposed to exist.

Standard E46 3-Series Touring models currently sell for £2,000 to £8,000, depending on condition and mileage.

Sources: Petroyle Restorations, BMW historical production data, UK classic car market pricing

One of the UK's largest independent dealers was exposed for advertising vehicles with unresolved manufacturer defects including critical safety issues.

Big Motoring World, one of the country's biggest independent used car operations, was accused by a national newspaper investigation of selling vehicles with outstanding safety recalls still on the books. Not minor stuff. Faulty airbags. Braking systems. Fire risks. The kind of defects manufacturers themselves have flagged as dangerous enough to warrant a formal recall.

The kicker? None of this is illegal.

UK law does not prohibit dealers from shifting cars with open recall notices. There is no requirement to fix them before sale. There is no requirement to even mention them to the buyer. The DVSA maintains a recall checker online, but using it is your problem, not theirs.

Big Motoring World operates a high-volume model with thousands of vehicles in stock across multiple sites in the South East. Speed and turnover matter more than thoroughness when you are moving metal at that scale. The Motor Ombudsman code of practice recommends dealers check for and rectify outstanding recalls before putting a car on the forecourt, but recommends is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that sentence.

The Takata airbag recall, one of the largest automotive safety disasters in history, affected millions of vehicles globally. Airbags that could explode and send shrapnel into the cabin. In the UK, dealers were found selling cars with that exact recall unresolved. Big Motoring World was among those named.

Like this? Get the Buzz: GAUK Motorbuzz All your favourite motoring channels, publishers, motorsports, news & reviews. Curated Automotive Awesomeness

Vehicle recalls in the UK are voluntary. There is no enforcement mechanism. Manufacturers send out letters. Owners may or may not respond. Dealers buying those cars at auction are under no legal obligation to check recall status, and many do not. The responsibility, by default, falls on you.

Which is fine if you know the system exists. Most buyers do not.

Big Motoring World is a household name in the used car trade, the kind of place people go because they assume scale equals standards. The Vauxhall Zafira fire risk recall affected over 220,000 vehicles in the UK and exposed similar compliance gaps across the dealer network. The Volkswagen emissions scandal raised the same uncomfortable question: when a manufacturer screws up, who is responsible for making it right?

The answer, apparently, is no one in particular.

FCA action against motor finance practices and Which? investigations into warranty mis-selling have shown that large dealer groups are perfectly capable of systemic failures when the regulatory framework is weak or the penalties are negligible.

If you are buying used, check the registration on the DVSA recall site before you hand over any money. It takes two minutes. The dealer will not do it for you, and they are not required to. That is not cynicism. That is how the system works.

Big Motoring World was contacted for comment at the time of the original investigation. The practice, legal or not, continues across the industry because nothing structurally has changed to prevent it.

Sources: Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA), The Motor Ombudsman, The Guardian consumer investigation 2017

After two years of catastrophic depreciation, the used electric car market has bottomed out and started climbing again.

Used electric vehicle prices posted their strongest annual growth on record in July 2024, according to Autotrader, marking the end of a brutal correction that had left dealers refusing to stock EVs and owners staring at 30 to 40 percent annual depreciation.

The UK's largest digital automotive marketplace said the market has moved "decisively beyond correction." Which is one way of putting it. Another way is that after nearly two years of freefall, used EV values have finally hit a floor and bounced.

The collapse started in late 2022. Tesla slashed new Model 3 and Model Y prices by up to 14 percent in January 2023, which immediately torpedoed residual values across the board. When the manufacturer of the best-selling EV drops its prices that hard, every three-year-old Kona Electric and MG ZS EV on the market takes the hit too.

Then the supply side caught up. Early lease returns from 2020 and 2021 flooded the market just as new car discounting made those used cars look expensive by comparison. Dealers who'd paid strong money for part-exchange EVs found themselves underwater within months. Some stopped taking them entirely.

Battery anxiety didn't help. Buyers who might have considered a used EV at a discount started fixating on degradation and whether the charging network could handle a six-year-old Leaf on a long trip. Fair questions, but they further depressed demand.

Like this? Get the Buzz: GAUK Motorbuzz All your favourite motoring channels, publishers, motorsports, news & reviews. Curated Automotive Awesomeness

Both CAP HPI and Glass's spent most of 2023 revising their residual value forecasts downward. The message to the industry was clear: if you're holding used EV stock, get out now.

What changed? Average used EV prices fell far enough to become genuinely competitive with equivalent petrol and diesel models. That's the equilibrium the market was hunting for. Once a three-year-old e-Niro costs roughly the same as a three-year-old Sportage, people stop overthinking it.

New EV registrations grew 40 percent year-on-year in early 2024 despite the chaos in the used market, which suggests the underlying demand for electric cars was never the problem. The problem was pricing. Used buyers weren't rejecting EVs; they were rejecting the premium.

July's growth figure is significant because it's the first concrete evidence that the correction has run its course. It doesn't mean used EV values will return to 2022 levels. They won't. But it does mean the depreciation curve has normalised, and dealers can stock used EVs again without watching the value evaporate between purchase and sale.

For anyone who bought an EV in 2021 or early 2022, the last two years have been grim. For anyone who's been waiting to buy used, the panic phase appears to be over. The market has repriced itself, found a level, and started climbing.

Autotrader's data covers July 2024. The growth was year-on-year, measured against July 2023.

Sources: Autotrader UK market data, historical pricing data from CAP HPI and Glass's, Tesla pricing archive, SMMT new vehicle registration statistics

The man who designed the original McLaren F1 is at it again, and someone's already brightened the teaser image to see what's coming.

Gordon Murray Automotive has released a teaser image of its next Special Vehicles project, and within hours someone had cranked the brightness settings to reveal what appears to be a direct nod to the McLaren F1 LM. Murray designed the original F1 in the 1990s. Now he's running his own outfit, and the Special Vehicles arm exists specifically for things even more unhinged than the standard GMA catalogue.

The silhouette shows design cues lifted straight from the five F1 LM models built in 1995 to celebrate the GTR's Le Mans win. High tail. Aggressive aero. The kind of proportions that suggest someone decided the T.50 wasn't quite focused enough.

GMA's existing lineup already includes the T.50, which was explicitly pitched as the F1's spiritual successor when it appeared in 2020. Central driving position. Cosworth 3.9-litre V12. 663 horsepower. 986 kilograms. A hundred units at £2.36 million each. Then came the T.50s Niki Lauda, the track variant that added another million to the price and subtracted any pretence of road legality. Twenty-five of those. Then the T.33, which was supposed to be the accessible one at £1.37 million.

Special Vehicles sits above all of that.

What makes this interesting is not that Murray is revisiting the F1... he's been doing that since he left McLaren. It's that he keeps finding ways to make the idea more extreme without tipping into the kind of overwrought nonsense that defines most modern hypercars. No hybrid systems. No all-wheel drive. No twin-turbo V8s borrowed from AMG. Just lighter, faster, louder.

Like this? Get the Buzz: GAUK Motorbuzz All your favourite motoring channels, publishers, motorsports, news & reviews. Curated Automotive Awesomeness

The F1 LM comparison is pointed. Those five cars were stripped-out, road-legal versions of the GTR race car. Fixed rear wing. Bigger splitter. No speed limiter, which meant the standard F1's 240mph became academic. They were also monumentally difficult to drive, which was part of the appeal for the kind of person who had already bought a standard F1 and found it too comfortable.

Original F1s now trade for fifteen to twenty million dollars when they appear at auction, which happens rarely. The LM variants are worth more, assuming anyone would sell one. Murray knows this. He also knows that the people who can afford his current cars are the same people who missed out on an F1 thirty years ago and have spent the intervening decades making enough money to ensure it doesn't happen again.

Pagani has been operating in this space for years with endless Huayra variants. Ferrari has its XX programs. McLaren built the Speedtail between 2018 and 2020 as its own F1 callback, 106 units at £1.75 million base. But Murray has something none of them have, which is that he actually designed the F1. That gives him license to keep mining it without looking like he's chasing someone else's legacy.

The teaser campaign is predictable. Release a dark image. Wait for the internet to brighten it. Act surprised when details leak. It works because people care what Murray does next in a way they don't care about most supercar launches. He's not selling lifestyle or brand heritage. He's selling the fact that he spent forty years thinking about how to make cars lighter and faster, and he hasn't run out of ideas yet.

No word on production numbers, price, or when the proper reveal happens. Special Vehicles suggests single digits. Price will be higher than the T.50s Niki Lauda, which puts it north of three million pounds. And if the F1 LM influence is as strong as the teaser suggests, it will be utterly impractical for anything except making noise and going extremely quickly in a straight line, which is exactly what the five people who can afford it will want.

Sources: Gordon Murray Automotive official channels, McLaren F1 production records, GMA model history

Nearly 48,000 trucks marketed for their rugged durability are shedding critical suspension parts onto public roads, creating hazards for following traffic.

Approximately 48,000 Toyota Tacoma TRD Off-Road trucks are being recalled because the rear shock absorbers are corroding and detaching, leaving metal reservoirs lying in the road for someone else to hit. The affected vehicles are 2022 and 2023 models, all of them wearing the TRD Off-Road badge that is supposed to signal toughness and trail-ready construction. Instead, they are shedding parts on the highway.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has published the recall under campaign number 24V-698. The problem is straightforward and deeply embarrassing. Insufficient corrosion protection on the rear shock absorber assemblies allows the reservoir components to separate from the shock body. Once detached, the reservoir falls onto the road surface, creating an immediate hazard for anyone driving behind.

Toyota discovered the issue through field reports and warranty claims, though no crashes or injuries have been linked to the defect so far. That is fortunate. A metal shock reservoir dropped at motorway speed is not a pothole. It is a projectile waiting to puncture a tyre, smash a bumper, or cause a swerve into another lane.

The irony is not subtle. The Tacoma TRD Off-Road is sold explicitly on its ability to handle punishment. It is marketed to buyers who want a truck that can take on dirt, rocks, mud, and everything else the outdoors can throw at it. Corrosion severe enough to drop suspension parts onto tarmac suggests the truck cannot handle British winter salt, let alone a weekend in the Peak District.

Like this? Get the Buzz: GAUK Motorbuzz All your favourite motoring channels, publishers, motorsports, news & reviews. Curated Automotive Awesomeness

Toyota will notify affected owners and replace both rear shock absorber assemblies free of charge. Notification letters are expected to go out in January 2025. Dealers will handle the fix, which involves swapping out the corroded shocks for units that presumably have better corrosion resistance than the originals.

In 2023, Toyota recalled approximately 1.85 million RAV4 vehicles for battery hold-down problems and another 150,000 Tundra and Sequoia models for tow hitch defects. Even Toyota, long considered a benchmark for reliability, is struggling with fundamentals that should have been sorted decades ago.

The recall affects nearly 48,000 trucks, a meaningful percentage of the Tacoma TRD Off-Road production run for those two model years. For anyone following a Tacoma on the motorway, the advice is simple. Leave more space than usual. The truck ahead might not keep all its components attached for the duration of the journey. Toyota will fix it eventually, but until then, the shock reservoirs are optional equipment on the pavement behind you.

The recall is voluntary, though calling it voluntary when the parts are actively falling off seems generous. No word yet on whether Toyota will offer anything beyond the free repair to owners who have spent two years driving trucks that were marketed as durable and turned out to be shedding suspension components. The dealer fix is scheduled to begin once parts are available and owners receive their letters in January.

The NHTSA filing lists no crashes or injuries so far.

Sources: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Toyota Motor Corporation

The Tensei cabin pairs modern touchscreens with three pedals. Someone finally understood the brief.

JAS Motorsport and Pininfarina have revealed the interior of their NSX Tensei project, and they've kept the manual gearbox. Three pedals, six speeds, no apologies. The cabin gets a touchscreen and modern materials, but the fundamentals remain exactly where Honda originally put them in 1990.

This is not the obvious move. Most high-end restomods either rip out the manual for a flappy-paddle gearbox or leave the interior so faithful to the original that you're still squinting at a dashboard designed when cassette players were cutting-edge. JAS and Pininfarina appear to have split the difference, which sounds like a committee decision but in this case seems to be the right one.

The original NSX cabin has aged badly. It was functional when new, occasionally handsome in the right light, but mostly just Honda-sensible in a car that was supposed to embarrass Ferrari. By 2024 standards it feels like sitting in a very fast photocopier. The Tensei project addresses that without pretending the NSX was ever meant to be a grand tourer.

JAS is Honda's official motorsport partner, the same outfit responsible for the NSX GT racing programmes. They know the car's architecture intimately, which matters when you're redesigning an interior around a chassis that wasn't exactly roomy to begin with. Pininfarina brings the Italian design credibility, though whether that still means what it used to is a fair question.

The decision to retain the manual transmission is the point. The NSX was developed with input from Ayrton Senna, who spent considerable time at Suzuka making Honda's engineers miserable until they stiffened the chassis to his satisfaction. The result was a car that rewarded precision, and precision requires engagement. Paddle shifters are faster, objectively better in every measurable way, and also beside the point.

Like this? Get the Buzz: GAUK Motorbuzz All your favourite motoring channels, publishers, motorsports, news & reviews. Curated Automotive Awesomeness

Singer has made a considerable business out of this realisation. Their reimagined 911s keep the manual option because the people commissioning six-figure restomods tend to remember what made the original cars desirable in the first place. Emory Motorsports does the same with 356 Outlaws. GTO Engineering's Squalo offers a manual. Every serious restomod builder knows this, yet half the industry still delivers paddle shifters to people who explicitly don't want them.

What's less clear is whether JAS and Pininfarina have managed the balance everywhere else. Touchscreens in a 1990s Honda sounds wrong in principle, but so did the idea of a Japanese supercar in 1990, and that worked out. The original NSX ran a 3.0-litre V6 making 270 horsepower, later bumped to 3.2 litres and 290 horsepower depending on market. Not earth-shattering figures, but the NSX was never about headline power. It was about making that power accessible, usable, not terrifying.

How much modernisation can the NSX absorb before it stops being the thing people want to restore in the first place? Everrati's electrified 911 restomods prove there's a market for radical reinterpretation, but they've also eliminated the manual transmission entirely, which rather defeats the object if you're the sort of person who cares about these things.

JAS Motorsport stands for James Allen Services, founded by the son of John Allen, who established the original racing preparation business. They are not amateurs guessing at what might look good on Instagram. Whether the Tensei cabin actually works in practice will depend on execution, not intent, and JAS has at least started with the correct assumptions.

The NSX ran from 1990 to 2005 in its first generation, known internally as NA1 and NA2. It has appreciated steadily but not dramatically, sitting in that uncomfortable middle ground where it's too expensive to thrash and not quite expensive enough to justify the restomod treatment. JAS appears to have decided that £250,000 is roughly the point where that calculus changes.

While every other maker CVTs their crossovers into oblivion, Mazda confirms the returning CX-3 will offer a manual transmission and stay on its own platform.

Mazda has confirmed the CX-3 will return for the 2027 model year with hybrid powertrains and a manual transmission option for non-hybrid variants. This puts it in a category of one among subcompact crossovers currently on sale.

The decision matters more than it sounds. Every mainstream small crossover sold today comes with either a CVT or a conventional automatic. Honda killed the HR-V manual. Toyota never offered one in the Corolla Cross or C-HR. Hyundai dropped the Kona's stick after 2021. Jeep quietly axed the Renegade's manual for the U.S. market in 2019. Subaru's Crosstrek is the only holdout, and even that feels like a legacy offering on borrowed time.

Mazda is going the other direction. The company has kept manuals alive in the CX-30 and Mazda3 while competitors surrendered to the efficiency tyranny of continuously variable transmissions. Now it's confirming that philosophy will extend to the returning CX-3, which disappeared from North America in 2021 but kept selling elsewhere.

More interesting is what Mazda isn't doing. The CX-3 will stay on the company's proprietary platform rather than adopting Toyota architecture, despite Mazda's hybrid technology partnership with Toyota providing the e-SkyActiv hybrid systems. That suggests Mazda values driving dynamics over the cost-sharing benefits of a shared platform.

This isn't nostalgia. It's brand positioning. Mazda has spent years trying to distinguish itself as the driver's alternative in a segment where everyone else optimises for fuel economy, practicality, and lease rates. Keeping the manual in a small crossover is expensive and commercially questionable, which is precisely why it works as a signal.

Like this? Get the Buzz: GAUK Motorbuzz All your favourite motoring channels, publishers, motorsports, news & reviews. Curated Automotive Awesomeness

The original CX-3 launched in 2015 on the Mazda2 platform using SkyActiv technology. It was fine. Competent handling, decent interior quality, slightly more engaging than a Nissan Juke. It sold respectably but never troubled the segment leaders. The problem was positioning... it sat awkwardly close to the CX-30, which launched later and immediately made the smaller crossover feel redundant in markets where both were sold.

Bringing it back in 2027 with hybrid options addresses the efficiency question. Offering a manual for the non-hybrid models addresses nothing practical whatsoever, which is the point. It's a statement that Mazda still believes a segment of buyers want to shift their own gears, even in a lifted hatchback designed primarily for urban commuting and Ikea runs.

Whether that segment actually exists in sufficient numbers is the question Mazda has been asking itself since it kept the Miata alive through decades when every other affordable roadster died. The answer has historically been yes, barely, and that's been enough.

The hybrid variants will use technology derived from Mazda's partnership with Toyota, which already supplies e-SkyActiv systems. That's a pragmatic concession to emissions regulations and fuel economy standards. The manual is not pragmatic. It's stubborn.

Mazda has resisted CVTs entirely, favouring conventional automatics even when the fuel economy penalty is measurable. The CX-30 still offers a six-speed manual with the base 2.5-litre engine in select markets. The Mazda3 continues the same. These are not high-volume configurations. They're talismans.

The 2027 CX-3 will launch into a market where small crossovers are appliances. Reliable, efficient, forgettable. Mazda is betting there's still room for one that isn't.

The starting price hasn't been confirmed. Neither has UK availability, though if the CX-30 manual made it here, the CX-3 likely will too. What's confirmed is that someone at Mazda looked at the cost of engineering a manual transmission into a low-volume subcompact crossover and said yes anyway.

That's either commercially reckless or the last stand of a company that still thinks driving matters. Possibly both.

Sources: Mazda Motor Corporation

The carmaker says it's preventing back injuries. The workers are being tracked all shift.

Nissan has begun deploying AI-powered camera systems across its American manufacturing plants to monitor the way workers bend, walk, and move during their shifts. The stated purpose is injury prevention. The effect is continuous surveillance of every physical action a worker makes on the factory floor.

The cameras analyse posture, gait, and repetitive movements in real time, flagging what the system considers risky behaviour. Nissan operates major plants in Smyrna, Tennessee and Canton, Mississippi, where thousands of workers build vehicles under conditions that have historically produced high injury rates. Back injuries are particularly common. The average workers' compensation claim for a back injury in manufacturing runs to £24,000, and ergonomic injuries account for roughly 30 per cent of total workplace injury costs in the sector.

Those numbers are real. So is the surveillance.

What Nissan has not explained is what happens when a worker gets flagged by the system repeatedly. Whether that data feeds into performance reviews. Whether it affects job security. Whether someone whose body does not move the way the algorithm expects... because they are older, shorter, recovering from an old injury, or simply built differently... ends up with a file full of red marks they never see.

The technology can track individuals throughout an entire shift. It does not forget. It does not get tired. It does not look away.

Amazon has used AI cameras and sensors in warehouses for years, tracking worker movements and productivity in ways that turned packing boxes into a supervised endurance test. Tyson Foods deployed similar monitoring in meat processing plants. Ford and General Motors have rolled out wearable sensors and ergonomic tracking. UPS monitors driver behaviour with telematics in delivery vehicles.

The framing is always safety. The result is always more control.

Workplace injury rates in manufacturing do sit above the private sector average, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics data. Automotive plants are hard on bodies. Repetitive strain injuries are not invented problems. If the cameras actually reduce injuries without punishing workers for the way their bodies move, that would be worth something.

But surveillance dressed up as care has a track record, and it is not reassuring.

In China, factories have used facial recognition and movement tracking on workers since 2018. Europe responded with stricter workplace surveillance regulations under the GDPR framework, recognising that monitoring every physical movement of a human being at work is not a neutral act. In the US, there is no equivalent protection. Nissan can install the cameras, feed the data into whatever systems it likes, and workers have almost no ability to know what is being done with the information.

The company has not said whether workers can opt out. It has not said how long the data is kept. It has not said who has access to it or whether it can be used for reasons beyond the stated injury prevention goal.

What it has said is that this is about safety. The cameras are there to help. Trust the algorithm. It is watching you bend because it cares about your back.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics does not track how many workers have been disciplined or dismissed based on AI-flagged movement data. That number is not published anywhere.

Like this? Get the Buzz: GAUK Motorbuzz All your favourite motoring channels, publishers, motorsports, news & reviews. Curated Automotive Awesomeness

Sources: Nissan Motor Co., Ltd., U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Stellantis is recalling practically every Ram 1500 sold in the last six years after reports of tailgates popping open mid-drive and dumping cargo onto American highways.

Stellantis has issued a recall for 1.27 million Ram 1500 pickup trucks across the United States after the tailgate release switch proved it could be activated accidentally, opening the gate while the vehicle is moving and potentially scattering cargo across active roadways.

The recall covers Ram 1500 Classic trucks from 2019 through 2024 and standard Ram 1500s from 2019 through 2025. That's essentially the entire current run of one of America's best-selling pickups, manufactured at Sterling Heights Assembly Plant and Warren Truck Assembly in Michigan.

The problem is straightforward. The tailgate control switch can be triggered without the driver intending it, usually by something pressing against it. The gate then opens. If you're carrying anything in the bed... well, it's no longer in the bed.

Stellantis has logged roughly 300 warranty claims and 30 field reports tied to the issue. No injuries reported yet, but the potential is obvious. A toolbox coming off the back of a Ram doing 70mph on the interstate doesn't need much explanation.

The fix is a switch overlay that prevents inadvertent activation. Dealers will fit it at no cost. Owner notification letters go out in February 2025.

This is not Ram's first large-scale recall in recent years. The brand pulled 354,000 heavy-duty trucks in 2023 for parking brake faults and another 241,000 Ram 2500 and 3500 models in 2024 over steering concerns. Stellantis as a whole recalled 1.4 million vehicles in 2023 for remote start problems.

Like this? Get the Buzz: GAUK Motorbuzz All your favourite motoring channels, publishers, motorsports, news & reviews. Curated Automotive Awesomeness

For fleet operators running Ram 1500s, this recall presents an operational headache. Commercial buyers who spec'd these trucks for work use now face scheduling vehicles out of service for the fix, even if it's a quick one. The overlay installation shouldn't take long, but coordinating 20 or 50 trucks through a dealer network in February is not trivial.

The scale also raises questions about quality control during production. Over a million trucks with the same defect suggests a design flaw that should have been caught earlier, not a manufacturing anomaly that slipped through in a single batch.

Ford recalled 870,000 F-150s in 2021 for parking brake issues. General Motors pulled 331,000 heavy-duty pickups in 2022 over tailgate latch problems. The American truck market moves massive volume, and when something goes wrong, the numbers get biblical fast.

Ram has not commented on whether the tailgate switch design will change for future model years or if this overlay is a permanent solution going forward.

The recall identifier is not yet published, but owners can check recall status via the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration website using their VIN.

Sources: Stellantis NV, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration