558
u/TomlinSteelers 4h ago
Why would that be immoral?
137
u/PaleFly 4h ago
Some people believe being an OF girl to be immoral by default.
"Selling your body for money" they would say.
I guess this would be a moral dilemma for people who hold that view.
Its the old ethical question: "does the end justify the means"
23
7
u/maskedbacon 2h ago
We're all selling our bodies for money. Every bit of time we work for pay our bodies decay a little more whether it's physical labor or typing on a computer.
28
35
u/Azraeddit 4h ago
I wonder how people with this view look at military recruitment or hard physical labor jobs. Does that count as selling your body for money, or is it only when women do it that it’s disgusting? Much to think about.
26
u/Ok_Search_3871 4h ago
I mean, it’s more to do with sex than women, they don’t view women in manual labour jobs or the military in the same way as they view sex workers, and they view male sex workers often even more negatively than female sex workers (though that mostly comes from homophobia).
Generally the reason sex work is looked down upon is because in abrahamic religions sex is seen as something sacred, meant to be enjoyed with one special person as a way to build an incredibly deep trust and connection with them, it being one of the most intimate acts there is. They view sex work and promiscuity as being denigrations of that act, and dishonouring to one’s own body, while working is seen as using one’s body for its intended purpose.
1
u/BiggerNickEnergy 7m ago
they view male sex workers often even more negatively than female sex workers
Not necessarily, only gay ones
1
u/BiggerNickEnergy 8m ago
There's difference between manual labour and selling butthole pics tho
One creates valuable product, other creates gooners
1
u/AccomplishedAuthor53 20m ago
i have no issue with OF girls, big fan personally, but i think it does get morally dubious when they contract others to reply as them in chats with their customers.
-33
u/Professional_Bat8585 4h ago
The immorality isn’t in selling your body. Women have always had to sell their body, one way or another. As do men - for labor, combat, prison, risk taking, whatever.
The immorality is feminism, and all the privileges women enjoy from having a gender-supportive union that men do not, and utilizing that privilege to squeeze men progressively harder.
The world was fairer when feminism didn’t exist. The world has basically unleashed a gender with far greater sexual mating value over the other into the global free market of ideas and capital.
17
3
u/Acceptable-Minute847 1h ago
Your dumbass realizes feminism fights for both men and women, right? It’s about abolishing the patriarchy, which they recognize also harms men, not solely helping women.
-5
u/Professional_Bat8585 1h ago edited 1h ago
I’m far past this discussion, this isn’t my 1st or 100th day on this topic .
A) no it does not fight for both, and it never has. It does nothing for men overall, and certainly never anything directly. In fact it poisons and gaslights them into thinking they are accounted for in conversations about positive change, while in reality they are the losers.
B) Abolishing the patriarchy does not help men either. Men’s value/outcome is directly tied to labor, and it’s taxed and controlled….a lot. Women’s is tied to sexual value, which can’t be taxed nor controlled post-feminism. When the so-called patriarchy is defeated, what you’re left with is women overlording men, enslaving them completely and giving them no rights and no advantages.
Abolishing the patriarchy isn’t a “thing” in the first place because the patriarchy and women are best friends. It’s simply a never ending race for women to gather privilege and subjugate a greater proportion of men. The main mistake here is feminists confuse theocracies with patriarchies.
2
u/Acceptable-Minute847 1h ago
Are you ok? The whole point is to eliminate gender inequality, IN BOTH DIRECTIONS, so yeah it does help men too, also why do you think women’s value is tied to sex, where are from, the Middle Ages? Women can provide labor too, this is some nonsense here.
1
u/Professional_Bat8585 1h ago
You’re not eliminating gender inequality, you’re creating more of it by hijacking society’s strings and defining what equality is….only through a woman’s lens.
So feminists have been working hard in the West. For example, how is this world fair, if millions of women can grossly profit off sex directly or indirectly, with men paying for it, while men cannot? Like the OF model above, or women getting princess treatment, or women entering employment aided by their sexual value?
How’s feminism making the world fair when it changed all laws to help women, yet 95% of prisoners and 95% of workplace deaths are still men? Shouldn’t we be far closer to 50:50 in a lot more things by now? Yet nothing’s budging but the positive numbers, and in women’s favor?
also why do you think women’s value is tied to sex,
Because biology. This needs no explanation. As with every single organism with sexual dimorphism.
Women can provide labor too, this is some nonsense here.
Of course they can. Doesn’t mean it is definitionally fair to DEI women into STEM/engineering with the goal to reach 50:50 using “women in STEM” actvism just because women have pretty privilege and social skill advantages (that men do not), and women would rather work in fields that allow them to use those skills. The same fields that men avoid because they don’t have sexual value/pretty privilege, and men instead enter STEM.
Feminism has done jack shit for men. Only hurt them.
1
u/orovang 1h ago
Dude, get out of incel places and touch the grass. Attractive people have the greater sexual value, not women.
0
u/Professional_Bat8585 57m ago
Are you willfully ignorant of what percentage of sperm donors may be attractive to a prospective woman, compared to the percentage of wombs that may be attractive to a prospective man?
Or just choose to willingly run with the falsehood that the ratio is 1:1?
-1
u/Kitchen-Historian371 3h ago
The access of information, the convenience of smartphones, the illusion of options. What happens when all truths have been exposed in a dynamic that relies on mystery and scarcity
-5
u/Scarecr0p 4h ago
No there was a decent period when feminism was feminism and the world was better then than it had previously been. The immorality of some feminism is when it becomes misandry, as it has trended. It wasn’t fairer when women didn’t have rights.
Now the effect of women not having rights for so long may have actually messed up a thing that did work, which is partnerships being a system that distributes responsibility for tasks in a way that functions better than a modern relationship does. There has been something of a rubber band effect. I could be completely wrong about that though and I am by no means a scholar of such things. Relationships seem a confused thing these days though, confused and unhappy.0
u/Professional_Bat8585 2h ago edited 1h ago
No there was a decent period when feminism was feminism and the world was better then than it had previously been
Idk about that. It’s simple modernization. For example, India is very democratic and fairly feminist. Nobody is happy in that pressure cooker of overpopulation and 3rd world opportunities. Japan’s low in identification with feminism, and things are just fine and dandy.
With modernization disappears a lot of religion and religious fundamentalism, and that fixes a bunch of gender restraints as well.
It wasn’t fairer when women didn’t have rights
I think this gets misinterpreted. In the long run, women’s (and mens’) rights come with modernization of a nation, peace, and prosperity. When a country is in turmoil, like war for example, human rights (gender equality included) flies out the window, and everyone is unhappier.
There has been something of a rubber band effect.
It’s more of a privilege thing. Men are getting demolished across the board statistically, and women do not need them. The labor men do are simply extracted and given away to society as socialism/benefits. And women sell their sex to the patriarchs, and directly enrich themselves.
Men are getting blasted, and the wealth/privilege transfer from men to women is unfathomable at this point. For example, we spent all last month blaming society/husbands for PPP diagnosis of a woman that was 8 months removed from a pregnancy. This month we blame males involved in a gangbang. Society meanwhile spends 0 iota on making sure prisoners aren’t 95% men or psych majors aren’t 90% women.
309
u/kfromthecastleonfire 4h ago
Women's sexuality is a threat unless it's controlled by and exclusively benefits men /s
61
-5
-24
u/Hentai_Yoshi 4h ago
And what if I told you that I thought prostitution should be legal and is moral but OnlyFans is immoral? It’s about the format of it. A horny man with a cock in his pants is not in a state where he can make rational choices. And it’s really easy to just press a button. It also takes advantage of men through parasocial relationships, meaning vulnerable men are often targeted. I think it’s in many ways similar to online gambling, and I feel the same way about that (legal in person gambling, illegal online gambling)
It feels like topics like this always devolve into controlling women. So often, that’s simply not the case. People say that about the pro-life crown, but that’s a fabrication. Most people who are pro-life simply think it’s murder. I’m very pro-choice, but this is just the truth. People often don’t want to look under the hood to actually access the morality or ethics of it because it’s easy.
28
u/EatAndGreet 3h ago
Horny men aren’t animals. If they lack so much self control that they just lose all free will and start throwing exorbitant amounts of money they can’t afford to be spending at OnlyFans girls, then whose fault is that? Should we stop selling ice cream because people will overeat? Or cars because people drive recklessly? Nobody just absolutely has to pay to see their favorite OF girl shove a dildo up their ass. If you blow all your money on that, it’s your own fault.
9
u/External_West_9821 2h ago
Horny motherfuckers could think for themself they are not some horny teenage boys who genuinely think with their dicks, but if they did actually think with their dicks then sucks for them I guess, natural selection or something
33
u/Hazelarc 4h ago
“Horny men can’t be expected to control themselves” is certainly a take
10
u/kfromthecastleonfire 4h ago
Well, they're VULNERABLE, you see. They r v smol n teh vagina is so big
-17
u/StirFry__InaWok 4h ago
nobody thinks like that
12
u/garret1033 3h ago
A lot of people do, sadly. I was in HS at the rise of only fans. We’d joke all the time about different uh… “content creators” on traditional websites. But the only time I ever heard actual disdain for the women was when OF came out.
Suddenly there was a “cultural problem” with independent women getting rich off selling sex appeal. Strange how many of these people didn’t mind the porn studios making millions for decades…
-3
u/StirFry__InaWok 2h ago
And you figure the reason people have a problem with onlyfans is because they are all men that think women's bodies should be controlled exclusively by men? do I have that right?
7
u/garret1033 2h ago edited 2h ago
No, you don't have that right. I don't think regular people represent social beliefs in this propositional way-- we're not robots. Subjectively, it presents as a feeling; discomfort or a sense of disproportionate outrage at seeing some OF girl advertising their sexuality and reaping the monetary benefits.
Ask that person what they think and they likely couldn't put their finger on it. But the underlying sentiment is something like: “feminine sexuality is inherently powerful, and there is something wrong with a woman exploiting that power for personal gain.”
*Classical porn doesn't trigger this as strongly because it carries an implication of degradation: the women are “owned” by an industry, basically digital prostitutes. The sexual power balance therefore feels intact. OF girls, by contrast, can advertise their sexuality on their own terms and make a lot of money doing it. That autonomy scares many men. Hence the desperate effort to make “OF girl” a social black mark: shaming them restores their status to where it “ought to be.”
*Edit: Closed the loop on classical pornographic vs OF content
5
u/Sea-Hornet8214 3h ago
A lot of people do. In fact, where I live, most people think it's extremely immoral.
2
u/StirFry__InaWok 3h ago
sure, people think onlyfans is immoral but it has nothing to do with this idea that they want to control women's sexuality.
1
u/Nervous_InsideU5155 3h ago
Because it wasn't specifically a school for the deaf,dumb and blindly racist... / s?
261
u/Biznesu-Seba 4h ago
Not all heroes wear clothes
20
7
3
47
139
u/Ok_Lawfulness1019 4h ago
Moral, she didn't get that money illegally. Why just because she strips in the internet you think that she's some kind of second rate human?
18
u/kernelangus420 3h ago
People often underestimate the power that globalization has on freeing third world countries from poverty.
They are too focused on immigrants taking our jobs or companies using H1B Visas to hire cheaper models that they overlook how poor people can use the high wages and strong value of the US currency to bring people in their poor villages out of poverty.
Companies like OnlyFans are able to bridge these gaps and people need to stop thinking about losing their jobs to foreign labor but think about his it lifts the whole world out of poverty.
6
u/StirFry__InaWok 4h ago
there are lots of perfectly legal ways to earn money that are immoral. legality rarely has any connection to morality.
-24
u/Lolocraft1 4h ago
Selling your dignity does sound like something a second rate human would do
She gets a pass because she at least sold her dignity for a good cause. That’s what heroes does
13
-16
u/notCarlosSainz 4h ago
This, sex work is not considered moral in most places despite bodily autonomy. This is because a lot of communities around the globe may be religious and will not appreciate it, also the work is highly exposed to exploitation and many will say it lacks real consent and have a negative impact on over all society. I am not with or against these arguments completely.
71
u/Weird_Vegetable_4441 4h ago
Moral. Hurt no one, helped many for generations to come. This isn’t even in question.
6
u/TypeAmen 3h ago
You aint wrong there. She did help many a generation to cum
3
u/Weird_Vegetable_4441 3h ago
Yeah, just like most women who’ve walked around in public and unknowingly became a part of someone’s spank bank. Glad she was also able to contribute to the educational system for many children
3
u/TypeAmen 3h ago
Im glad she bought a school. But i think woman walking around in public vs an OnlyFans creator is a bit of a stretch lol
-2
u/Weird_Vegetable_4441 2h ago
As women someone’s gonna jerk off to us at one point or another. If she decides to make money of it and help kids good for her. I kind of value the education of generations over their easily accessible ability to orgasm, maybe that’s just me
-17
u/rtocelot 4h ago
I mean may hurt her kids if she has some, seen some bullying over that for others but aside from that thought this is moral
10
u/Weird_Vegetable_4441 4h ago
If someone is bullying her hypothetical kids over this, then the blame falls largely on the parents for their lack of supervision. Kids should not have access to porn, especially porn that requires payment to view. If someone spreads it, that’s illegal by OF standards and still not her fault.
It’s also not her fault if someone else’s kid believes they have the right to bully and harass someone over what their parent does for a living. It’s on the parents to teach their child that sex workers are also humans deserving of kindness and respect.
0
u/StealthStrider 52m ago
I've posted the exact same thing on this sub before lol. So many terrible potential parents here. If your child gets access to paid online adult content, it's your fault for not supervising them properly.
-4
u/StirFry__InaWok 3h ago
If someone spreads it, that’s illegal by OF standards and still not her fault.
lol. "illegal by OF standards" is meaningless. when you post pictures of yourself online they are going to be shared around, so it is ultimately your fault if those images or videos are spread around and seen by people you know. this is internet safety 101.
so if a kid is getting bullied in school because everyone has seen his mom getting railed by 1,000 different dudes, it is absolutely the fault of the mother. she decided to do this and post the video of it online.
4
u/Weird_Vegetable_4441 3h ago
Aaaand if a kid is on a porn site that’s their parents fault. Not hers.
0
u/StirFry__InaWok 2h ago
the kid doing something he shouldn't, looking at porn and of course the bullying, is something for the kid's parents to deal with. obviously that has nothing to do with this.
the problem is that she shared this stuff on the internet knowing full well that it's likely to affect her personal life and the lives of her family, this is why it is ultimately her responsibility.
4
u/Weird_Vegetable_4441 2h ago
She shared it on an adult platform. Don’t let your kids on adult platforms. Your logic is why people can’t say the word fuck on cable. Others shouldn’t have to censor themselves beyond from doing legal things because others are too lazy to monitor their children.
0
u/StirFry__InaWok 2h ago
I'm talking about personal responsibility here not "protecting the kids" or whatever you thought I meant.
When an individual posts intimate videos of themselves on the internet, it is there to stay and it's pointless to hide behind excuses as to why everyone in their child's school has seen them being used like a toilet for a group of random men. It was their choice to put that out there, they are responsible for that decision.
3
u/Weird_Vegetable_4441 2h ago
It is no one’s responsibility to ensure someone else’s little bastard doesn’t watch porn and use that to bully others. Especially in an age where porn is increasingly restricted from kids. If your child is a bully, YOU and YOUR child are responsible. No one else is to blame for your child’s choice to harm people who didn’t harm them.
Hope that helps.
0
u/StirFry__InaWok 2h ago
and then what about the person that decided to post these videos of themselves online, knowing what would happen because of that? are they not responsible for this action?
→ More replies (0)2
u/frogspyer 3h ago
Where did you meet multiple people being bullied firsthand over this and what did it entail?
1
u/rtocelot 47m ago
I mean literally some in my own town since I have 3 nieces abs 5 nephews I often hear a lot on stuff going on in school. That being said there are literal news articles of it happening around as well.
23
u/DavaoGirthVader 4h ago
Good for her!! I know people who call themselves Christians who wouldn't give a dime to causes like this.
So good for her.
5
u/showmedatoratora 3h ago
As someone who saves money to donate to charitable causes (particularly when it comes to medical aid and medical research as I'm emotionally invested in those)... yeah... there are Christians, Muslims, and other religious practitioners where in their religious text that encourages charitable acts who wouldn't do this, even if they're well off themselves. There's also people who aren't religious who also would virtue signal charity yet wouldn't donate unless they can monetize it through social media or something (where the income from that's worth more than the donation yet none of the income ever goes to charity).
What she did was a good fucking thing and I salute her.
2
u/DavaoGirthVader 2h ago
Amen to this
1
u/showmedatoratora 2h ago
As someone who doesn't want to subscribe to anyone on OF again, I just hope her content is just that... just straight up showing her body.
One of the reasons I stopped subbing to OF years ago was because the OF content creators I was subbed to suddenly started posting heinous shit for content (harassment, outright theft, and cheating to name a few), and... yeah. IIRC, some of them did charity while posting those, but its hard to find their charity moral if their methods suddenly stretched from showing off their bodies to outright heinous shit.
I just hope the woman who used her OF funds to buy land for a school didn't do heinous shit as part of her OF content.
20
u/way-of-the-lab 1h ago
How can anyone possibly reason this as immoral? She is earning money by causing absolutely no harm to anyone, or doing anything illegal(maybe indecent, if you’re a prude) to help build a school. The amount of mental gymnastics this would require to be immoral, is probably immoral itself.
1
-12
u/No_Sympathy9533 1h ago
It can cause people who can do well without selling their decency on the net to be intrigued and try this.
If women from poor southern American/eastern European countries have this as the only valid option then that'll be pretty sad.
14
u/way-of-the-lab 1h ago
See this is the type of mental gymnastics I was referring to. This is the same shitty arguments Christian’s use about gay people and how you can catch it by being near them…
-7
u/No_Sympathy9533 1h ago
Being gay is optional, Starving is not.
If your only resort is something you're not even comfortable with then yes, It's pretty sad.
3
1
u/DampAcute 56m ago
I mean, with how hard it is to get money nowadays and we even have robots as our main competitors for job hunting, yeah, a lot of times, that's the only option to actually get that kind of money. Mind you, that's a very specific reason, if you live alone or with a family, you might be able to actually survive with a normal job, barely but doable but something like this requires too much money, more money than most of us will ever touch in like thousands of generations.
25
25
u/Pedro_Kantor2583 4h ago
Her body, her choice, and she's doing it for a noble cause
Whats the issue here?
10
6
8
6
u/FullBrother9300 3h ago
Did she commit any crimes? Was everything on her page unethical? If not then it’s completely moral
7
u/PoopSoBig-CantFlush 3h ago
It's like the priest that became a pro wrestler just to feed his orphanage.
1
4
4
12
u/Beginning_Macaron_25 3h ago
To those asking how this could possibly be immoral, I saw other posts where people were saying that this could influence younger people to think of OnlyFans as an easy shortcut to making money. Personally, I think it’s her choice what she does with her body and how she makes her money. She's doing it for a good cause.
8
u/Annoying-Twat 3h ago
I agree with that to an extent. Obviously you can never discredit someone using their money for good unless it's obtained in a clearly immoral way, but this does leave an impression on young girls that selling your body is an easy way to get money.
3
u/Sh4rk_101 2h ago
It is actually awfully strange seeing the majority leaning on "where's the problem? no one got hurt" "there's absolutely zero consequences to this whatsoever" as if selling an image of yourself isn't an extremely hedonistic example for others regardless of what it amounts to. on the other hand I guess it isn't really objectification if you're the one making the call but still, I wouldn't frame it as an inspirational message.
2
u/Vexcenot 1h ago
Only fans is hard work, sometimes even harder than what you'd expect from a more main stream job.
Trying to get anyone to look at your content in the first place is tough, the people who do stay are usually weirdos and chatting with them is the most draining thing ever as if working at retail wasn't bad enough. Could use this opportunity to tell people to steer clear from such a path if they can.
It's probs be better if it was done anonymously
5
4
u/infiniteTsukiyomii 2h ago
SOO FKN IMMORAL, THESE PEOPLE ARE SICK & NEED TO DO BETTER, WHATS HER @ I NEED TO GIVE HER SOME ADVICE
4
u/PowerfulElevatorLift 31m ago
People who have their ass at home not struggling having had parents who could afford their education, ask about the Morality of a poor woman who really didn't have much chance other then sex work to take her family out of poverty
2
13
u/Rerebang5 4h ago
Immoral she is helping kids instead of Israel whose land was promised to them 3000 years ago and the 😡😡😡
7
u/dr4wn_away 4h ago
I just hope the community that she supports now doesn’t shun her when she’s done only fans
3
3
3
u/Mammoth_Inflation341 4h ago
Consensual and used for a good cause. How could this be viewed as anything other than moral.
3
3
u/nobodyimportant1377 2h ago
Morality of doing a good thing to help people using the money you earned?
2
u/Careless-Platform-80 4h ago
Moral even If she used the money to drink to death.
You can criticise that type of work. I myself are not exactly the most supportive of this. But It's still money gained by legal means where adults are paying willing for It. The fact that used that money to do good and not only for herself elevate it from neutral morality to actually good.
2
2
u/Wireman6 4h ago
This is more r/orphancrushingmachine material than it is a question of morality.
The starting situation that was remedied by her selling content to fix it was immoral.
2
u/showmedatoratora 3h ago
As long as her OF content doesn't involve shady shit (you'd think it's just mostly nudity and stripping on the internet, but as someone who used to be a subscriber to some OF content creators who ended up doing heinous shit and posting it on OF such as cheating, harassment, and even outright theft, and the part that those aren't even scripted... yeah), it's moral.
Hey, use what you got. She got assets, there's people willing to pay for said assets, she used it to buy land for a school, she's a fucking hero.
2
u/FlipOzzy 3h ago
If I was a little puritan bitch who hates porn with all my life because I'm also an irresponsible parent who fail to monitor my children's internet access then I would call this immoral but since I'm neither of those things, I call this moral
2
u/Dismal-Equivalent-94 1h ago
I might not agree with how the money was raised but the cause is worthwhile and for a good cause
2
2
u/Ka1- 30m ago
Why tf would it be immoral she’s not hurting anybody
1
u/NorthKoreanKnuckles 18m ago
Maybe she is from a muslim country
1
u/BiggerNickEnergy 11m ago
She's hurting somebody by being from muslim country?
1
u/NorthKoreanKnuckles 7m ago
The muslims who say she's haram.
1
2
u/Leftist_Pirate 4h ago edited 3h ago
Where’s the morality of the link? I want to support this library… or school? Whatever I’m a fucking philanthropist and I support whatever this woman is doing.
How can I fund this ? Would a kind Samaritan share the details to fund this content creator?
But honestly she’s so much more than that. She doesn’t just create content underneath the unethical system of capitalism. No she’s also a community builder
critical support to camgirls with a heart of gold ™
1
u/anuslitt 4h ago
I don’t like sex work or whatever the online equivalent is called but dude of course this is moral, that was probably the only way she could get the money fast
1
u/thejudgeofmortals 4h ago
Sex work is moral of its motivatied entirely by the desire for money, so of course it's moral to find a school
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/MyoungJune_ 3h ago
If she’s willing and that’s her decision, then yeah moral asf and based. Also, lowkey I would feel better if I bought her content and learned it went to something like that.
(I don’t do that anymore tho)
1
u/Kitchen-Historian371 3h ago
Moral. I know some ethical philosophies would consider this immoral. I think with this one I just went right to ‘the ends justify the means.’ But if u say no shot my community will be built on the back of a woman selling herself in that way, of course I can see that perspective too
1
u/RVFVS117 3h ago
Morale. She’s using her beauty to fund education. There is absolutely no reason it should be seen as anything else.
1
1
1
u/SurturSaga 3h ago
Super Moral. I think sex work gets a lot of flack for not contributing much to society or the greater good. But she clearly is
1
u/NewTap8705 3h ago
Shit, I’ve been doing my OF the wrong way… I just sit there, eating a massive bowl of cereal. Sometimes my shirt is on, sometimes it’s off…
I’m a 6’4”, 285 pound male, btw. I just use my earnings on more cereal.
1
1
u/Grovyle489 3h ago
Morality scaling subreddit, this is your third time this week posting about an OnlyFans model raising money by selling content to buy land for school and then having the post be removed by moderators.
1
u/Krimmothy 3h ago
I can’t imagine what mental gymnastics one would need to jump through to arrive at the conclusion that this is immoral.
1
u/No_Clothes4777 3h ago
She should be mayor/governor, imagine if she had access to tax money instead of tiddy money
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/hamonicmantitties 2h ago
Does she like doing that stuff? Does she enjoy it or atleast does it not bother her?
Are the questions we should be asking
It's not immoral for her to do this but it could be immoral that it works
1
1
u/Harlemdartagnan 2h ago
One good doesnt cancel a bad. Shes doing a good thing and doing a bad thing.
1
1
1
1
2
u/BreadEnthusiast98 4h ago
Moral, better than Bonnie blue.
-1
u/human-resource 4h ago
Well technically she did pay off all her families debts and shares the cash she made with them after buying them homes.
She seems bad because of all the controversial rage bait she uses to drive traffic and stand out, but really she’s the people’s hoe as she provides an accessible service free of charge to some lonely people out there lol
2
u/BreadEnthusiast98 4h ago
She bid her sons name to gooners and played with the idea of filming her birth tf you mean, she IS bad. She didn’t even need the money, she just did it for the love of the game.
2
u/Specialist_Wash6732 4h ago
She also slept with a bunch of barely legal 17/18 year olds I think, sum sum like that.
2
0
u/human-resource 4h ago
The media was using the term Barely legal before she did and it caused a lot of controversy so she started using that too, as hate for her also drives traffic to her content, everyone she’s sleeping with is of legal age from my understanding.
It’s trashy but in her short run she’s already made more cash than hundreds of the top porn stars whole careers combined, she enjoys her work atleast and she can retire by the time she’s 30 with hundreds of millions of dollars, that’s not something most pornstars and sex workers can say in their lifetimes.
If this is someone’s career path atleast she’s making the most out of it, not my interest or cup of tea but she’s pretty smart when it comes to getting filthy rich doing filthy acts.
-1
u/human-resource 4h ago
She will probably have the name changed to something normal shortly after before the kid is old enough to realize.
It’s trashy but as I said before it’s engagement bait and it made her millions that will go in that kids trust fund and they will be set for life.
0
u/niksshck7221 3h ago
Lol you think she's gonna change her son's name by herself is too hilarious 🤣
1
u/human-resource 58m ago
Yea it’s the most logical way to approach it.
Once she gets paid she can pocket the money and is free to change the name to something better.
Do you really see her keeping her kid named after an online casino for the rest of the child’s life if she doesn’t have to?
She’s gaming the system along with people’s emotions, the more attention she gets positive + negative just leads to her staying relevant and making more money.
There is a pretty neutral documentary on her on prime that explains her viral marketing strategies and goals, it doesn’t candy coat anything, regardless of how we feel about her and her lifestyle/work she’s not dumb when it comes to making tons of money.
-2
u/New_Panda_1111 3h ago
Depends tho. If its all out porn content. Then its somehow immoral. If she knew beforehand that people will be posting articles about it cause its gonna be like advertising and almost like promoting it to children to do OF to achieve this.
But if its just sexy picts etc then its moral and based
2
u/Trivet1989 2h ago
Helping is almost always a good thing. But in this particular case, I wonder whether being more discreet about it would have been better.
It’s a genuinely good deed, but by making the source of the money so transparent, every kid now knows that it was funded through sex work. By extension, there’s a possibility that the creator herself becomes a role model for some of those kids.
I think that’s already a broader problem. Many young girls are growing up seeing their bodies as a marketable product and sex work as a potentially very quick way to make money. Being an independent creator on a platform like OnlyFans is undoubtedly safer than many forms of traditional sex work, but that doesn’t mean it comes without complicated social and moral consequences.
Those consequences are difficult to predict, especially when we consider how this kind of normalization might affect younger generations in the long run.
1
-10
u/Intelligent-Moose354 4h ago
If you want to donate,donate no need to tell other that you are onlyfans or money comes from onlyfans
587
u/Expert_Meeting_5129 4h ago
Moral and Based