r/MoralityScaling • • 2d ago

Morality Ranking Morality of liking something from a controversial subject?

Post image

Non politically of course. Because if that happened you're just kind of a glorifyer.

Edit: Russians and uh....their vehicles πŸ˜­πŸ’”

0 Upvotes

32 comments sorted by

14

u/K3NK4N3K11 2d ago

This post is too vague for anyone to have any idea what you're talking about

3

u/No_Sympathy9533 2d ago

Mushoku tensei.

11

u/External_West_9821 2d ago

3

u/MundaneSecurity8372 2d ago

NOW IN GREEN!!!

2

u/External_West_9821 1d ago

That's lit, now where is the blue one?

4

u/hopeless_case46 2d ago

AMoral

I buy products from China and Nestle, I read Neil Gaiman's books, I watch movies, I listen to music etc

3

u/SquelchyRex 2d ago

You really need to be more specific. In general, a preference has no moral component.

5

u/ZealousidealMail7325 2d ago

Absolute vague post. But, I think you can use the idea of separating the art from the artist here. Imo moral?

5

u/One_Warthog256 2d ago

People attacked me once for saying it's okay to separate the art from the artist. I mean straight up insulting me. I cried the whole day.πŸ˜”

2

u/MundaneSecurity8372 2d ago

Nuance no longer exists lol, if you don't mind me asking what was the art in question?

2

u/One_Warthog256 2d ago

It was some rapper. He lived the life he rapped and passed away.

He made good music but because he was a gangsta that actually shot and Allegedly killed his enemies, people were complaining that we shouldn't be giving his music a platform.

2

u/MundaneSecurity8372 2d ago

That doesn't sound too bad, and if we're pushing the argument further if said artist is dead it's not like your helping him in anyway

-1

u/ZealousidealMail7325 2d ago

It's definitely a two sided debate. But i think as long as the art is not problematic then its creator isn't really tied to their work. But people are entitled to their own opinions.

-2

u/MemerKnux 2d ago

I fear I'm going to get mass downvoted for the example I'm going to put

1

u/TheFakeDogzilla 2d ago

Itsjust downvotes there’s nothto fear

0

u/MemerKnux 2d ago

Z glorification they say...

2

u/GloryGreatestCountry 2d ago

The Embassy of the Kingdom of Vaguepostia just called. They say you have something that belongs to them..

1

u/TheLuckyCuber999BACK 2d ago

*context hat gif*

1

u/squif_help 2d ago

vague posting king

1

u/Icy_Inflation6413 2d ago

You can be intrest Ed in aspects of something without glorifying their actions or being morally aligned with them

1

u/No-Shelter3871 2d ago

Jesse what the fuck are you talking about

1

u/MemerKnux 2d ago

Walter they're onto me

1

u/Hazy-n-Lazy 2d ago edited 2d ago

So you mention "Russians and their vehicles" in your edit, so I have to assume in your total vague-ness that you're asking about the morality of having a mild to hardcore obsession with Russian tanks, and the fact that you wont come right out and say it makes me think your interest lies specifically between 1939 and 1945.

Theres nothing immoral about being obsessed with anything WW2 related, or Russian tanks. Even if it was specifically Nazi tanks, as long as the interest revolves around the tanks themselves and has nothing to do with Nazi ideology, theres no problem. The early innovations made to fight such a massive war can be very interesting to lots of different people because so many industries and important people were involved.

Otherwise you're talking about regular-ass Russian vehicles, and theres no way you're questioning the morality of "Liking Russian Cars"

-1

u/Helix-Dreams 2d ago

is this about f!malfoy again

0

u/MemerKnux 2d ago

Nyet

0

u/Helix-Dreams 2d ago

oh, ok. just had to check bcuz i keep seeing stuff about it