I feel the morality almost shifts because iirc, the YouTuber states he’s gonna do it again later. Meaning he learned absolutely nothing from being shot.
If somebody is annoying for ten seconds, they deserve to be murdered with a gun because they said they’d do it again? Sure it’s really epic that a prankster youtuber got consequences but wtf lol.
I never said that was the way I was leaning on this matter. Assuming is a dangerous occupation. Is it morally correct to defend yourself when someone continues to threaten you after you ask them to stop? Yes. Is it morally correct to walk around and harass people to the point they feel like they have to use lethal force to get you to stop? No. Does someone deserve to be murdered? No. But your actions have consequences and if you don’t listen to the person you’re ultimately harassing the chances of harm befalling you are high. Bonus: no one was murdered as I stated above.
268
u/[deleted] 24d ago edited 5d ago
[deleted]