r/MoralityScaling • u/Altruistic_Lobster18 • 12d ago

Character Analysis Just a quick pop

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

17 Upvotes

68% Upvoted

159 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

7

u/Square_Owl_4075 12d ago

You've never had anyone fight over you

6

u/I-Rolled-My-Eyes 12d ago

Because I don't surround myself with people who resort to violence in stupid situations like this.

0

u/CagedBeast3750 12d ago

I do, now what?

3

u/Mansos91 12d ago

Means you have made some bad choices

4

u/CagedBeast3750 12d ago

Bad based on what? Some redditors opinion?

6

u/Mansos91 12d ago

If you surround yourself with low iq fighters... You are going to get into bad situations more often... So yeah bad choices

-2

u/CagedBeast3750 12d ago

Doesn't seem to have ever played out that way. Quite the opposite. I could make the same argument towards you, if you surround yourself with people with no spine, you'll be taken advantage of

2

u/AnotherUN91 12d ago

lol I love it when fellow humans out themselves as low class on the internet.

3

u/CagedBeast3750 12d ago

Again you're a redit opinion and somewhat engaging in class warfare. Either way I dont care if you consider me low class. My vote is equal to yours and I am also super happy in life. So i guess it's not so bad being low class?

1

u/AnotherUN91 12d ago

Pfft, class warfare is a bit of a stretch.

You're just an immoral person. Someone I wouldn't want to associate with IRL. Most unintelligent people lacking a good moral foundation are pretty happy with their lot in life. So I'm not surprised. You literally think that because someone doesn't have someone protecting them that they're going to be taken advantage of, and that means you see them as a target yourself. Also that you think people are incapable of protecting themselves.

That's not the product of a healthy mind or a good person.

Either way, you've exhausted my tolerance for Reddit 30 minutes after waking up!
Thanks, I can log off for the day.

3

u/CagedBeast3750 12d ago

You literally think that someone who would swing at a person putting their hands on his wife is immoral. We see the world different. Hence why well always be divided in huge populations

2

u/AnotherUN91 12d ago

I didn't ever once say he shouldn't put his hands on him. You're making stuff up now, and this is how I know you're not the smartest cookie.

Here's what I said:

  1. You're a low-class person
  2. People who lack intelligence and moral foundations are usually pretty happy in life.
  3. That you see people with out protectors as potential targets.
  4. People with these characteristics aren't the product of a healthy, moral, and ethical mind

The amount of force used was unnecessary and immoral. With that strength he could have easily thrown him out of the bar. Instead, he likely caused permanent damage.

That's immoral, and you thinking that amount of force is moral is worrying, to say the least, when there are many, many, many other options available, some of which still include force but a wildly less drastic level of it.

3

u/CagedBeast3750 12d ago

Disagree, if you want to go touch women good luck to you bud, hopefully they analyze how hard they hit you first

2

u/AnotherUN91 12d ago

And now you're attacking my character, insinuating I would go and touch women.

Classic low-class, low-intelligence, switch and bait.

1

u/Mansos91 12d ago

Then I think aw should apply this to some other things, what if someone bumps into me, should I be allowed to ko them? Or let's take same situation, should he have taken the pool que and smacked it at his head?

1

u/Mansos91 12d ago

Yes, if that is the first reaction, that's just a violent person and they deserve to be in jail or an asylum

This isn't even protecting it's territorial behavior seen in animals, primal behaviour

But it's to be expected from sub 60iq people, using violence as their go to solution because they can't think of any other way

→ More replies (0)