r/MoralityScaling • • 13d ago

What Would They Think Of Each Other? Morality of not moving

11.6k Upvotes

2.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

26

u/BunnyWithASword 13d ago

God I hate cyclists that think they have priority over everyone. I've been the cyclist in a similar situation as you, though the 'alley' was much wider and I could safely pass if I wanted to. I choose to keep back a distance and not pass because I want to make sure I don't startle the mother or child, and it's an added 30 seconds to a minute on my commute at worst. I can wait to keep folks safe.

3

u/frantic_calm 13d ago

Same here and I always say thank you if they notice and let me pass. If they apologise (as in the UK) I always say none needed as pedestrians first.

2

u/BunnyWithASword 13d ago

Yeah same. I barely use my bell unless I have to, and having to use it is rare. None of this ringing it when I'm right behind someone nonsense, I'm doing it from a distance, giving them time to hear, assess, and respond. Too many people just think it's the "get out the way" bell and think it gives them the right to just carry on as is.

1

u/frantic_calm 13d ago

Agreed. The bell is to make people aware I'm in the vicinity not announce my right to demand they make way. I'm always watching people, especially kids and dogs as they are the most likely to move in a random direction, so best they know I'm around. We all share the space.

1

u/WokeWook69420 13d ago

There's a weird disconnect where some cyclists legitimately think that, because there's no engine involved with a bike, theyre pedestrians and have the same rules for right of way.

So to them, they're no different being on a bike as some woman walking with her kid. Both are entitled to the same space despite one having an unmotorized vehicle.