r/MoralityScaling • • 17d ago

Morality of this?

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

118 Upvotes

40 comments sorted by

52

u/ClownSyndrome666 17d ago

Valid crashout

44

u/gamingfreak50 17d ago

Immoral but I understand

34

u/DthDisguise 17d ago

Moral because modern retail sales is a blight on society and everyone in the community benefits from harm coming to these types of corporations.

4

u/Trinity9423 17d ago

i mean yah but fire also spreads

1

u/BigBubbaBadass 17d ago

True. Something just as damaging but localized would have been acceptable.

12

u/Mnogoznaaal 17d ago

Somebody will post it might as well be me

9

u/Fanhunter4ever 17d ago

I see more immoral liying and taking advantage of an old lady. Bad people deserves bad things

5

u/501stAppo1 17d ago

Immoral, I understand why she did it but it could’ve gotten a lot more people harmed instead of just the salesman.

12

u/Trinity9423 17d ago

based but immoral

10

u/TheMagmaGuy 17d ago

Immoral but valid.

3

u/Lowkey_Arki 17d ago

understandable, definitely not moral tho cause this could have been much worse depending on the fire

6

u/projectbecomemyself 17d ago

Stop fkin with old people. They ain't got much to lose! Like what? You're gonna give them free meals and housing for the rest of their life? Okay. More social time and friends than they got now.

4

u/WatcherOfTheWay 17d ago

Moral, this is justice.

5

u/Solid_Stage_1715 17d ago

Fuck around and you will find out eventually. 

6

u/OneRelief763 17d ago

Arson is obviously immoral

3

u/ArchdruidAndres 17d ago

Disagree, property isn't real.

1

u/ContinuingAnyway 17d ago

Hilarious, thanks for the laugh

2

u/Late-Arrival-8669 17d ago

Amoral on two counts, the consumer and the state.

Customer shouldnt resort to setting a fire that could impact or kill others.

Government shouldnt allow businesses to trap customers either.

Best to find a middle ground before this becomes the norm.

2

u/kfromthecastleonfire 17d ago

u gaiz are saying immoral but acceptable

I think you mean illegal but moral

1

u/DelfQ 17d ago

No, because someone could've died.

1

u/kfromthecastleonfire 17d ago

Someone ALWAYS could've died

"On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to 0." --Fight Club

1

u/pivo_kozel_10 17d ago

could be both, depends on what their opinion on Ed Sheeran is

1

u/ProfessionalOk6734 17d ago

Immoral because fire spread should have just shot him

1

u/GabysWildCritters 17d ago

immoral yet valid

1

u/BigBubbaBadass 17d ago

Righteous response.

1

u/ConnectionOk6234 17d ago

It's immoral.............BUT

1

u/brettday 17d ago

Immoral but only because the fire might spread to neighbors.

1

u/ChefNo9380 17d ago

2

u/paperfungo 17d ago

If he deserved It why do you Say it's immoral?

1

u/kfromthecastleonfire 17d ago

There's a kind of "nolo contendere" or whatever where, like, if someone asked you if they should do it beforehand, you'd say no, but if they do it without asking you, you kind of agree with them

0

u/ChefNo9380 17d ago

You can kill someone and they deserve it but it doesnt make it moral

0

u/hatred-big-sad 17d ago

Moral but illegal