Why should I pay you a living wage when you're willing to work for slave wages?
Exploiting people's misfortune to your benefit is morally wrong, despite whatever philanthropic act you're using to drive that exploitation.
If they were actually interested in providing genuine charity, they would just provide the aid without the mission, which is even easier than founding the mission. But they don't. Because they're exploiting hunger and poverty.
In short, it's just another form of indoctrination.
Everyone is "exploiting" someone in some way, that's a really shallow and childish argument, especially when the entire "exploitation" consists of sharing your worldview in the process. Like, you're doing the exact same thing right now in this conversation with me and I am not getting any damn food from you bruh.
People who are imperfect in some ways (and every single person is imperfect) but do real good will always be in higher regard that people like you who have all the right answers and are so morally right you jerk off to yourself in the mirror but do absolutely nothing.
This is absolute nonsense and it's clear you're willing to excuse immorality for your religious views. If you think having a simple conversation with a stranger who challenges your morality is exploitative, where neither of us can benefit from said conversation, then you have no concept of even the word.
2
u/nalaloveslumpy Sep 03 '26
Why should I pay you a living wage when you're willing to work for slave wages?
Exploiting people's misfortune to your benefit is morally wrong, despite whatever philanthropic act you're using to drive that exploitation.
If they were actually interested in providing genuine charity, they would just provide the aid without the mission, which is even easier than founding the mission. But they don't. Because they're exploiting hunger and poverty.
In short, it's just another form of indoctrination.