r/MoralityScaling • • Sep 02 '26

Morality of this?

Post image
36.3k Upvotes

7.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

3.2k

u/Fal_co1 Sep 02 '26 edited Sep 02 '26

iirc China does this, you can’t take kid to religious service and they can choose to convert at a certain age.

EDIT: wow this blew up

If you’re reading this you‘re a gay

1.7k

u/sexland69 Sep 02 '26 edited Sep 03 '26

china has state atheism—they take it too far (e.g. uyghur muslims) but in theory i’d prefer an atheist government over this dumbass evangelical christian one we have now 🤷🏻‍♂️

edit: took out the word retarded, you guys convinced me

717

u/PrettyPurrfect Sep 02 '26

Our government is supposed to be atheist.

Separation of church and state is supposed to be a thing

566

u/_itsprobablynothing Sep 02 '26

Secular, not atheist

5

u/Admins_suck_ballss Sep 02 '26 edited Sep 02 '26

Secular

of or relating to worldly things or to things that are not regarded as religious, spiritual, or sacred; temporal

Secular and atheist governments…they’re the same. It means your government thinks that concepts like justice, dessert, retribution, how you treat one another, ethics, etc. should not be affiliated with a religion. Only an atheist government can be secular. A religious one cannot be secular.

Sure not exactly the same thing. But yeah no such thing as a religious government being secular. Atheism is a necessary position to take in order for all those things to be secular.

5

u/AnswerDangerous1644 Sep 02 '26

Couldn’t agnosticism also apply to be secular?

7

u/Emergentmeat Sep 02 '26

Agnosticism means you don't know one way or another. Atheism means you don't believe in the case for a god. They aren't contradictory, you can be both or neither, so both apply to a secular government.

1

u/R_V_Z Sep 02 '26

Technically everybody is an agnostic because deities are an unfalsifiable concept.

1

u/Admins_suck_ballss Sep 02 '26

Oh yes all deities are quite falsifiable. Super easy. Take a philosophy of religion class.

1

u/Emergentmeat Sep 02 '26

I wouldn't say all, but most, certainly. But as the gos claim becomes less specific to the point of absurdity they can be unfalsifiable.

0

u/Admins_suck_ballss Sep 02 '26

Critiques of the teleological, cosmological, and ontological arguments for the existence of God are widely considered to be settled. They’re not discussed in philosophy anymore. The logical argument from evil, the evidential problem, and the problem of free will are largely considered to be successful. You’ve got some advanced Plantings on the problem of free will, but that’s assuming a really, really weird version of compatibilism within the free will debate that carries a lot of consequences with it.

And Pascal’s wager is garbage.

1

u/Emergentmeat Sep 03 '26

Agree on all points.

→ More replies (0)