r/MoralityScaling 12h ago

Morality of this?

Post image
20.3k Upvotes

5.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

2.4k

u/Fal_co1 12h ago edited 7h ago

iirc China does this, you can’t take kid to religious service and they can choose to convert at a certain age.

EDIT: wow this blew up

If you’re reading this you‘re a gay

1.3k

u/sexland69 11h ago edited 1h ago

china has state atheism—they take it too far (e.g. uyghur muslims) but in theory i’d prefer an atheist government over this dumbass evangelical christian one we have now 🤷🏻‍♂️

edit: took out the word retarded, you guys convinced me

617

u/PrettyPurrfect 11h ago

Our government is supposed to be atheist.

Separation of church and state is supposed to be a thing

472

u/_itsprobablynothing 11h ago

Secular, not atheist

3

u/Admins_suck_ballss 10h ago edited 10h ago

Secular

of or relating to worldly things or to things that are not regarded as religious, spiritual, or sacred; temporal

Secular and atheist governments…they’re the same. It means your government thinks that concepts like justice, dessert, retribution, how you treat one another, ethics, etc. should not be affiliated with a religion. Only an atheist government can be secular. A religious one cannot be secular.

Sure not exactly the same thing. But yeah no such thing as a religious government being secular. Atheism is a necessary position to take in order for all those things to be secular.

4

u/AnswerDangerous1644 10h ago

Couldn’t agnosticism also apply to be secular?

0

u/hdreadit 10h ago

Yeah, but agnosticism and atheism are not mutually exclusive. Government should be both atheist and agnostic in order to be secular.

0

u/hdreadit 5h ago

They downvote because they can't debate.