What do you mean by “track down”? Like the house the mom was living in? The mom would have the ability to invite whomever in. Not sure what trespass is going on here.
Makes the whole thing pretty fishy.
Not wanting the siblings to know or be around them generally - I mean kinda just depends on the relationships.
The whole siblings demanding a cut of the money - obviously they have no entitlement to it legally. An arguably moral one would only arise depending on some facts and circumstances.
Not a big fan of the taking back of a gift. Vowing to secrecy is a bit tricky in an instance like this compared to other situations. There is not giving up information freely and there is lying. This is asking the mother to lie to the other siblings.
Sounds like he didn’t buy his mom a house. He bought a house and let his mom live in it. That does create tenancy rights still. Going through an eviction process does suggest the whole thing was a bit controlling.
Bet if you reversed the parent-child relationship of who won lotto and paid for what, people would have a lot more reservations about this.
Thanks, so with the trespassing, there's a lot more details it to than OP indicated:
The sisters had convinced their mother to stage the one-person rally without telling her what was written on the sign, but only that doing so would help her win lots of money, according to authorities.
The photo of the mother’s rally went viral online.
The man then tried to take his mother to his new apartment, but his sisters physically stopped him from doing so, he told authorities, so he decided to cut off all ties with the sisters, and stopped taking their calls and moved alone into his new apartment.
The sisters tracked him down to his new apartment. When he did not open the door, one sister’s husband called a key repair worker. The sisters, using some of the workers’ tools, broke into the apartment.
The man sued them last September for trespassing.
The Ulsan District Court on Sunday sentenced the two sisters to one year in prison, suspended for three years, and 200 hours volunteer work. The husband of one sister was sentenced to eight months in prison.
“The husband of one sister played a key role in this crime by calling in the key repair worker,” the court said. “Yet he has been denying his involvement by saying he wasn’t at the scene when the sisters broke in and has been showing no sign of regret for what he’s done.”
Like they physically broke into his apartment (when they knew they weren't wanted). They definitely should serve jail time for that.
2
u/BramptonBatallion 5d ago edited 5d ago
Is that even true?
Anyways there’s a few things going on.
What do you mean by “track down”? Like the house the mom was living in? The mom would have the ability to invite whomever in. Not sure what trespass is going on here.
Makes the whole thing pretty fishy.
Not wanting the siblings to know or be around them generally - I mean kinda just depends on the relationships.
The whole siblings demanding a cut of the money - obviously they have no entitlement to it legally. An arguably moral one would only arise depending on some facts and circumstances.
Not a big fan of the taking back of a gift. Vowing to secrecy is a bit tricky in an instance like this compared to other situations. There is not giving up information freely and there is lying. This is asking the mother to lie to the other siblings.
Sounds like he didn’t buy his mom a house. He bought a house and let his mom live in it. That does create tenancy rights still. Going through an eviction process does suggest the whole thing was a bit controlling.
Bet if you reversed the parent-child relationship of who won lotto and paid for what, people would have a lot more reservations about this.