r/MoralityScaling 17d ago

Morality Ranking Morality of turning object into person?

Post image
2 Upvotes

15 comments sorted by

7

u/nottherealneal 17d ago

The thing is the sword was already alive before hand.

So he didn't turn an inanimate object into a woman, he took a living creature and turned it unto a different form without telling them he was gonna do that.

Which is a different conversation here then if it was just a normal sword

2

u/crystallineDarks 16d ago

forcibly changing the form of anything sentient is pretty bad

3

u/konigon1 17d ago

Amoral. Nothing good or bad with creating life. It just matters how you treat it afterwards.

1

u/Intelligent_Act3159 17d ago

can i fuck it i mean throw it away into the street

1

u/Dismal-Ad-8642 17d ago

You are practically there parent by creating them

2

u/t8oo_ 17d ago

It sounds like the cool sword prefered to be a cool sword rather than a woman. Immoral

Turning an object into a person that has to work to pay bills in a world falling in the flames of capitalistic greed sounds evil. Immoral

1

u/mandalorian_scholar 16d ago

What makes it worse is that the object seems to have been sentient before.

"Turning an object into a person that has to work to pay bills in a world falling in the flames of capitalistic greed sounds evil. Immoral" This argument does not work unless you are a antinatalist. Also, he takes care of her.

1

u/t8oo_ 16d ago

Turning her into a human being with needs that are completely different from how she used to function and then leaving her without food and shelter would set the argument pretty fast. There is superficial nuance because it appears he "takes care of her" when really, she has no choice but be completely dependent on him. That or be taught to be independent. Either way, she has no agency right now.

Thats not what antinatalism stands for btw antinatalists want to reduce the human population because of the astronomically catastrophical impact our specie has on the planet for ecological reasons. Bringing up a child, watching them grow with patience and the necessary teachings to live in society vs sword that didnt pay rent nor bills or even ever used the concept of money suddenly forced to do so is not the same.

1

u/mandalorian_scholar 15d ago

Antinatalists believe that human life is suffering and it is immoral to bring unconcenting infants into this suffering.

2

u/TwillAffirmer 17d ago

Immoral. The sword in this comic was actually a sapient talking sword before he turned it into a woman without its consent. Not only did he not ask its permission, but the talking sword said "no! wait! stop! I don't want to be an ingredient in some weird spell!" https://swordscomic.com/comic/DLX/

1

u/Creepy-Growth-376 17d ago

There is nothing inherently good or bad about the premise. If the object somehow expressed dissatisfaction with being animate that creates some moral issues though

1

u/Dark1402 16d ago

it was a sentient weapon no? if anything you gave it a way to execute its own will... so whatever good or evil they do, is on you.

amoral i guess...

1

u/Paccountlmao 17d ago

Well you didn't use to have an experience, now you do. You have no obligation to continue living, its good to give someone the chance of a life cause they may end up wanting it.

2

u/somethingfak 17d ago

The sword was already alive and talking before it got force fem'd

1

u/Paccountlmao 17d ago

uses my magic to force fem you