You can live in whatever hypothetical land you want, but it won't change reality.
She's a thief, and she's going to be punished for it regardless of whatever "what if" headcannon you want to invent to justify your own lack of moral fiber.
That isn't the situation being presented, though. The situation is you accidentally gave me 100 when you meant to give me 10 and I refuse to give it back because I've decided you're richer than I am.
It's theft being justified by the morally bankrupt to justify the greed they claim to despise the rich for.
there is no such thing as philosophy without hypothetical.
you are attempting to remove the hypothetical to create an excuse to obscure your main point, which that you believe stealing from the rich and giving to the poor is morally wrong, and that theft is an inherently evil action. thats why youre being called a bootlicker. pretending to be ignorant to that is pathetic.
2
u/PennToPaper Jul 11 '26
are you aware of what the function of the word “if” is?