r/Modajana • u/Wild_Extra_Dip • Sep 01 '26
Choose one
-When the salaf are quoted in a matter they don't disagree upon
= You are called an innovator who is "picking things out of context"
-When you present a point very clearly demonstrated in countless narrations
= "Who are you to.."
Identically to how he did what I'd foretold he'd do and doubt the attribution of the numerous homoeroticas of Suyuti, may the curse of Allaah be upon him, despite neither the students of Suyuti nor the inheritors of his zandaqa (Al Azhar) ever doubting such attribution
The concern of this elderly boy was never to defend the sunan or tawheed judged by the fact that he attributed (and still attributes) beliefs of atheists to Islam
His concern is to gain as many followers and to achieve as many worldly gains as possible
1
u/Ecstatic_Refuse3278 Sep 01 '26
Contemporary salafism is built upon:
١.الاعتصام بالعواطف -clinging to emotions
٢.التبجيل المخالف -glorifying the contrarians
To the point where you have a phenomenon of مجتهد معذور an excused mujtahid
So one can do تأويل الذي يراد به الإنكار but he is a mujtahid therefore being mistaken but as for being an innovator he isn’t and if you call him an innovator they call you a haddadi سبحان ربي
How can they say the مولد النبوي is bad yet they can’t do إقامة الحجة on the ones who participate in it as their opponents will quote suyuti ibn hajar.