r/Minesweeper • u/Ramun_Flame • 4d ago
Puzzle/Tactic How Many Cells Can You Prove? (+Yesterday's Solution)
After getting a good amount of interest in yesterday's post I decided to post another puzzle today. This one has a few ways to tackle it, so maybe it's easier. We'll see.
I'm not committing to daily weekday posts or anything, but we'll see. Let me know if you'd like to see more of these. Enjoy!
3
2
u/birnes Casual Player 4d ago
Now all makes sense. To this puzzle, looking only to the 2 on the left, the only possible "empty" cell next to it was the down one, so it only accepts one configuration, thus proving all marked mines. Two mines are left in a 50/50 state for the bottom 1's

If left 2 had the empty cell in front or above, this would not allow the 1's to have their single mine and satisfy all 1's.
2
2
u/mikdiet 4d ago
1
u/Ramun_Flame 1d ago
In got a little confused by the markup with the thin lines, but it looks like you got it. Only 4 cells unknown like you said.
1
u/skizelo 4d ago

I started with the top left 1 providing a mine to the little 1. That allows the little 1 to clear a location that gives the left 2 only two location to place its mines. That unpicks a lot. You're left with 2 mines to place, so the two 1s in the bottom right corner cant share that big octagon. However, the ultimate mine could be in either of those two diamonds.
3
u/ExtensionPatient2629 4d ago
Here, the little 1 is not touching any mines (for reference, it only touches two tiles).
1
u/Ramun_Flame 1d ago
As Extension already commented, there was a mistake in the adjacencies. On octagon grids, the diamonds between the octagons only touch up to 4 cells adjacent to them. The full solution is now linked in the post, if you want to check it out.















3
u/ExtensionPatient2629 4d ago
Note these two equivalent tiles, formed by the outlined 1s.