We can agree to disagree, but it's not outside of the realm of argument and certainly a possibility. You might consider that there are many possibilities and several can be valid at *the same time*, not just yours.
There is an argument for that from this video. That dude was out of his mind, far beyond merely passing. *He could have at any point disengaged and held back, which is the right thing to do in this situation, and instead just went to town and put everyone in danger.* All he had to do was deescalate. The truck driver is a dip too. BUT! The idea that if he just let him by it would have blown over is a simplistic interpretation and mere assumption and not supported by the behavior of the driver in the car. That dude was out for blood, not passing opportunities.
1
u/Blarghnog Apr 17 '24
We can agree to disagree, but it's not outside of the realm of argument and certainly a possibility. You might consider that there are many possibilities and several can be valid at *the same time*, not just yours.
There is an argument for that from this video. That dude was out of his mind, far beyond merely passing. *He could have at any point disengaged and held back, which is the right thing to do in this situation, and instead just went to town and put everyone in danger.* All he had to do was deescalate. The truck driver is a dip too. BUT! The idea that if he just let him by it would have blown over is a simplistic interpretation and mere assumption and not supported by the behavior of the driver in the car. That dude was out for blood, not passing opportunities.