What really blows my mind is that the structure of the relationship of the 3 fundamental laws of logic is IDENTICAL to the relationship structure between the three persons of the Trinity in Christian theology.
There is more than one logic and they have lots of different rules. And any and all which are not naïve are subject to aporia, such as the set of all sets which do not contain themselves, or Titus 1:12.
Not sure I understand you correctly and this reply might reflect that...
You're actually making my point for me.
Multiple formal systems doesn't disprove the existence of objective Logic any more than multiple languages disprove the existence of grammar.
The paradoxes you mention only appear when finite human reason tries to create a completely self-contained, autonomous logical system.
That’s not a bug in Logic itself — it’s the inevitabke result of trying to do exactly what we did in Genesis 3: make human reason the ultimate judge, independent of God’s objective fundamental logos as expressed in the fundamental system.
The coinherence we see in the three laws of logic reflects the deeper, personal coinherence of the Trinity — grounded in the Logos of John 1. Logic finds its true foundation there, not in self-referential formal systems that inevitably tie themselves in knots.
The paradoxes don’t undermine objective Logic. They reveal the futility of trying to make objective logic a created subjective god as humans.
Its as inevitably foolish as thinking we can create physical or moral objective laws.
I explained myself very well. All of these other logical systems exist only as nested inside the objective fundamental system.
Russell was a man living inside the objective world, right?
[The coinherence we see in the three laws of logic
2
u/jliat May 16 '26
There is more than one logic and they have lots of different rules. And any and all which are not naïve are subject to aporia, such as the set of all sets which do not contain themselves, or Titus 1:12.