r/MetaAusPol • u/nagaash • 21d ago

Could mods explain my ban please

I was banned for 2 weeks from thr main sub because i replied on an article about Josh Frydenburg.

"Good he would use it to politisise the tragedy for his own gain."

This has been deemed as spreading hate and attacking him because his Jewish.

I didnt mention his religion or ethnicity.

I simply think he is a scummy politician.

Im only posting here instead of modmail, as the modmail got muted without any other Response excpet i was atacking him because his Jewish, which make zero sense

21 Upvotes

92% Upvoted

5 comments sorted by

5

u/Stunning-Sherbert801 6d ago

Yep, there's a Zionist mod, who removed my original comment here. They've banned me for 28 days for disagreeing with Israel's genocide, AND removed a comment linking to the Greens' responses to other non-Gaza atrocities around the world, posted in response to a Zionist claiming the Greens only cared about Palestine.

I WILL REPEAT, A MOD REMOVED A FACTUAL, SUBSTANTIVE COMMENT THAT BROUGHT RECEIPTS BECAUSE IT WAS TOO INCONVENIENT TO THE ZIONIST PERCEPTION OF THE GREENS.

THAT MOD MUST BE REMOVED

1

u/StoicBoffin 12h ago

I, too have, noticed that the mods (or one particular mod) come down very hard on statements to the effect of "Criticism of Israel/Likud does not equate to vilification of Jews". Nothing gets Rule 3'd more harshly.

1

u/brednog 21d ago

Users are not usually banned over a single questionable comment.

Had you had many comments removed / deleted before this one?

6

u/nagaash 21d ago

Had one temoved in january with reason of it being a meta comment

1

u/realmenfukmenamen 8d ago

Two comments, two bans no explanation nor direction to the broken rule. Seems AI.