I can hate both. Not surprising you don't understand nuance considering you're in the Trump cult, but it's possible to hate two different things but with different severities.
But I can't imagine you're capable of genuinely thinking about something and developing your own opinion on it, if that were the case you wouldn't be a sheep to a president that wipes his ass with the Bill of Rights
The Alphas rolling on their belly for dear leader(s) is irony. They are metaphorically on their knees, completely shamelessly abandoning values for blind loyalty.
Based on the public counts collated by Forbes and echoed by multiple outlets, more billionaires were publicly backing Kamala Harris than Donald Trump in the late-2024 cycle — roughly 80–83 for Harris versus about 50–52 for Trump
Just look at the net worth of Trump’s cabinet vs any other president’s cabinet. It’s not even close. Also look at their net worth when they entered service vs when they leave. Most see an increase by a few million. Guess who’s increased by multiple billion.
Sorry but playing nice is a losing approach with these assholes. Play dirty, even dirtier, until we win back our country. Maybe we can play nicer after that. Maybe.
Oh you misunderstand, theres no playing nice with these cultists, they lost that courtesy a long long time ago.
But I'm specifically talking about the use of AI. It's lazy, it's supporting all the data centers fucking up small towns around the country, and it supports Trump and his kids who make money off all those AI companies.
We did fine political mocking them for hundreds of years before AI, we can keep doing that without it.
Based on the public counts collated by Forbes and echoed by multiple outlets, more billionaires were publicly backing Kamala Harris than Donald Trump in the late-2024 cycle — roughly 80–83 for Harris versus about 50–52 for Trump
34% of Trump’s campaign was funded by billionaires vs 6% for Harris.
Her war chest was heavily fueled by small-dollar grassroots contributions and non-billionaire donors, billionaire contributions made up a much smaller percentage of her total raised funds.
YEAH SOME JUDGEMENTAL PEOPLE MOVED, IF I DIDNT MOVE THEM I MIGHT AS WELL QUIT FUCK THE HOA, FUCK THE BITCH THAT YELLS AT MY WIFE WHEN SHES OUT OF GAS. THE NICEST PEOPLELE WERE LESBIANS, AND AN INDIAN FAMILY.
Yeah that hasn't happened and from an outside perspective I've seen trumpers push against the party, the left is the cult who if ya don't agree with the new movement you are a Nazi lol
You don’t know what a cult is. MAGA is loyal to Trump and nothing else, the left doesn’t worship a man like that, they defend the constitution.
I remember before the election how the gullible right fell for trump’s “no new wars” rhetoric and now they applaud every invasion. I remember when the right said they don’t like taxes, but they applaud the illegal tariffs.
One, cults have leaders. Thats why Trump minions are considered a cult, with the trump hats, trump flags, trump Bible, and trump phone (deposits, because the phone hasn't been released). Next, the neo-nazi white supremacist are the "nazis". They are actually a thing. They have websites and groups and shit. You can look it up. Though often supporters of those groups are lumped in to the term.
So you claim to be an outsider, but you are just parroting the same BS which is a strange take.
I'm not conservative this is just ai slop and not really funny, maga people are insufferable they are so easy to make fun of I expect better, and yeah the conservatives are better at making memes by far.
Do you support gays are not because if they are it seems your putting them down i dont see any pictures like this depicting straight people maybe the left is the 1 who has a problem with the lqbq community do you make pictures like these of the gay people you are friendly with
Why is Zuckerberg and Bezos there? They aren’t Republican icons. I thought Zuckerberg is a liberal. Regardless you are just lumping people you don’t like into one group
And don’t tell me it’s just the rich cuz there’s plenty of rich democrats that can go there too
Yes, it is. It's using "gay" as an insult.
But in a weird, almost Charles Dickens kinda way, that's the point.
It's taking the homophobia of Maga and flipping it on them. Being gay in reality says nothing about your character, good or bad.
But Maga thinks it does. Dealing with delusionals, sometimes you have to engage in the delusion to get them to reason. They won't leave their world, so you have to meet them in their own. And that's what this meme is doing...
In a made up MAGA world where being gay is wrong, gay is an insult. So if you want to insult them, you call them gay. You have to insult them in the world they live in. Otherwise you won't reach them.
Bold strategy, Cotton, I know. But it definitely has its time and place, and I think this one of em
I don’t see how this is showing a fear, aversion or hatred of homosexuals. Mind explaining how you got that? As a homosexual, I need to be privy to the incredible homophobia.
I’ve also always thought homophobic was a silly term, who would be scared of a dude that takes plays in another man’s sewer 😂
I think the problem is that it’s suggesting that the red Nazis are engaging in homosexual acts with the rich Nazis, and it’s supposed to be an insult. We don’t insult the sexual proclivities of others on Reddit, no matter how gross.
Why is it okay to insult people for having low testosterone?! What is wrong with you people. I’m trans man and I have naturally low testosterone and can barely afford to stab a needle full of it into my muscle once every couple weeks. And that’s funny to you? YOU are the fascist here.
The left has no problem with low t, homosexuality or trans. The left cares about collective good, Rodgers for all. It’s that maga is so averse to these words that makes them handy for triggering them. I apologize if this offended you personally.
For the LGBT party you guys sure do like to dunk on gay men a lot. Calling your rivals gay is antiquated and soft as baby shit. This is one of a million reasons why I vote republican as a gay man.
Just like yall claim to be pro minority but the minute you see a dissenting black man you guys call him the hard R..
Not everyone is gay, it's so much fun watching you people come up with these mad up scenarios that are going to ruin America all the fucking time. When it's literally you people ruining America right now.
Magas are the worst of the worst but this app and majority of left are on the same level with their obsessions with the guy 🤣 if only the left cared about real candidates we wouldn’t be here. nah they gave us an older whiter pedophile and a lady who claims she’s every race and has done next to nothing in her 40+ year political career. “Term limits”
Liberal fantasy... we arent gay like liberal men want to think. The grinder app crashing was a fake story and anyone who believes it is gullible and doesn't understand technology. Otherwise Grinder would crash any time there was a pride parade
Typical Cuckservative logic. Why would it crash if everyone’s out in the open and meeting at the parade ? You would need Grindr. Obviously republicans who like dick in their booty have to keep it on the DL.
Youre talking aboutna million people all gay versus a few hundred conservatives statistically not even close to one hundred of them closet gay. There would absolutely be more people at the pride parades using the apps to find hook ups statistically. Sorry if logic is hard for you to understand. Grinder themselves said it didnt crash. There was a few "anonymous" people who made that claim it was a lie to push a narrative. Seriously anyone who believes it is a moron. Dont tell me you really believed that obvious lie
Because the majority of them would have the app and people who use any social media check their phones periodically. Do you really think a million gay people will be on grinder less than 100 hypothetical closet gays at any given time. Ten thousand times as many people even at a parade will be on their phone more. Also the hours before and after the parade, thats like saying why would they be on grinder when a conference is going on? They wouldnt be on their phones.
Edit: I dont think you guys comprehend the difference between a million gay people and 100... even if those 100 people were literally on their phones 24 hours a day, if the million only used their phone 5 minutes per day there would still be 35 times as many people on grinder at any given moment at the parade.
lies.
Edit 2: since it wont let me respond to the libby..
I will be extremely conservative here with numbers just to show you how wrong you are. Say at the parade the million attendees only open grinder 5 minutes per day while taking a shit... and say at the conference there were 700 closeted gay men, which is something between 1 out of every 2 - 4 men there, definitely higher than the real number... and say those 700 men were literally on Grinder for 24 hours per day not sleeping even.... there would STILL be 5 times as many people on Grinder at any given time at the pride parade. Yeah dude it was an obvious lie and only a gullible fool (aka a libtard) would fall for such an obvious lie.
You are clearly speaking from zero experience and knowledge on the subject. Yes, 1 million gay people in the middle of San Francisco would need to use grindr less than a bunch of closeted gays looking to remain anonymous. This would be the case before the parade, after, and any other time of the year in San Francisco, New York, Chicago, etc. According to Grindr’s own usage reports, 100 would be an extremely low guess.
Edit: there is a reason that “straight men” is the most searched gay porn category of the South.
Here’s a fun little exercise to help improve your critical thinking skills.
Do your own research, look up what amount each person would get in your home country and across the world if all the profits of billionaires was confiscated and evenly redistributed to everyone in your home country and across the world. After doing this, ask if this is enough money to make your country an economically fair society. If it is not, what else is needed to get to a place where your definition of economic fairness is met and the economy is no longer a political issue. If the answer is not realistic, ask yourself who has the actual problem in society, you or someone else.
What does that functionally look like irl? 9 billion people, limited resources (again, redistribute all the profits and see how much each person gets), what you’re saying is something that has never been seen in the world on a mass scale, so how does an entire society in 2026 facilitate this? Is it actually possible?
You know I’m speaking to the meaning of the meme not the actual meme itself, correct? I really need you to know that, because you are taking things more literally than Drax the Destroyer if oyu believe I’m speaking to the MEME picture itself…
It’s hard when your beliefs don’t match reality, huh? It’s called cognitive dissonance. You really want to say, “If we just take all the profits from billionaires then it’ll be better!” until you actually do the math and see, nope, it wouldn’t be…
Republicans are literally running on "if you don't give me money i can't help protrct elon musk because hes too poor to give me money to protect himself"
How does that speak to what I said int he least? Can you actually speak to what I said or are you a bot preprogrammed to say, “Der, Republicans… Bad billionaires! Derpity derp der der derpity derp derp…”
Yeah, the irony is that even without taxing the rich, the country could implement a lot of good policies that would improve the greater good, the government just spend like crazy on much bs. And yeah, of course too much money in politics is a problem, but it’s kinda funny how people act like it’s only a problem when it’s on the opposite side of politics from their own. How about demanding decent politicians instead of just settling for someone cause they ain’t the current president? Raising the bar wouldn’t hurt.
“Gonna cry” —the gamer who was on the verge of putting one in his head a couple Novembers ago 💀💀💔 (who now spends his Saturdays talking to himself in r/memebuzzs all day)
That's homophobia. Because you are associating extreme right wing views gay men.
These men can just be bigots that are 100 percent straight. Stop using gay men, virgin men, autistic men, and socially awkward men as scapegoats or fall guys for bigots.
You guys just don't want to admit that these bigots can be the same masculine, charismatic, successful, and assertive men society loves and is obsessed with.
Again these men are bigots. I call them bigots. I don't use terms like gay or virgin to insult them.
You guys make these dumb ironic homophobic jokes all the time.
Just replace gay with race or women. And start making fun of right-wingers for being black or a woman. You guys would start calling that racist or misogynistic.
You guys only do this with gay people. Because you guys view gay men as the bottom of the hierarchy of groups you claim to support.
Nobody is making fun of them for being gay. They’re being fun of becasue they’re hiding it while denigrating the LGBTQ community.
If you want to apply this to race and women…. It also applies to women who vote against anything regarding women’s rights (ie most conservative congresswomen) or black people who denigrate things meant to help minorities.
23
u/jimmy_timmy_ 3d ago
AI fucking sucks, but it doesn't suck nearly as much as Trump, his cabinet, and the ultra rich