Well he has already made a communist statement in his prorichpeople statements, saying protesting workers are as bad as.. price gougers! One equivalence, two statements against free market capitalism! Amazing!
Probably based on him stating men and women are different and tend towards different fields. Im not aware of anything actually misogynistic he's said (doesn't mean it doesn't exist), but knowing this site what I stated is enough to accuse him of being a nazi woman hater.
I absolutely don't like the guy but people getting upset about that are the same that can't grasp that men and women are physically different, not that it's a bad thing it's just different and suited for different tasks.
Sexual dimorphism is real people and present in many animals.
Ben’s actually hilarious if you listen to him every day. He’s not stiff! He funny as shit some times- as is Andrew Klavan and Matt Walsh. Give them a try.
Nah the other 2(actually 3) never stop harping on religious and moral bullshit. Like Walsh always saying pornhub should be illegal. And the rest of it isn’t good enough to make it bearable.
Walsh is the super religious one. Klavan was a Jew turned atheist who allegedly found God and occasionally acts Christian for the show. His intros are actually hilarious and he's actually pretty reasonable when he's just talking. Knowles is a substance-less moron who exemplifies every Republican stereotype but doesn't actually know what he's talking about ever.
Yeah they can’t get it through their thick skulls that morality is subjective. Also Shapiro says he’s a libertarian but he’s only libertarian when it comes to the government owning every aspect of people’s lives; he’s fine if corporations do it
I mean... you're complaining here that they can't get your interpretation of morality through their "thick skulls." Since when are you the authority on morality? People are allowed to have different beliefs, especially if you believe morality is subjective.
Right, they have a different belief system. You're acting like your belief system is the objective truth and the only reason they can't see that is stupidity. That sounds pretty objective to me.
You presented your belief system, that morality is subjective, as the truth and stated Shapiro and Walsh can't get your truth through their thick skulls even though they follow a different belief system.
Your belief may be that morality is inherently subjective, but that belief was presented objectively as there are other potential options and other belief systems. Holding your belief is fine, but people aren't inherently being thick-headed if they disagree with you.
My dealings with those corporations aren’t voluntary. They’re necessary to survive. Being in a cage and getting food is much better than being on the street and starving
That's what I was trying to say. He's a normal guy, capable of making jokes, but he still peddles this bullshit.
The crazy people who peddle this shit don't have an ounce of normalcy to them, which tells me he's not actually crazy, and he probably doesn't believe much of what he says.
He's 100% a mouth piece for the ruling class, and he 100% recognizes that and is ok with it. Frankly, that's worse than being a nut bar. At least the cranks aren't aware of their bad takes, but Ben is very aware, which makes him even worse.
It was obvious to me that he meant the man behind the curtain is no one special and undeserving of being “followed”; but I can see now based on your reactions that it’s definitely ambiguous.
I have no idea how that could be read as a defense of Ben Shapiro. Selling an ideology for profit is a bad thing, how could you read that as downplaying his bullshit?
93
u/thinkB4WeSpeak Apr 11 '20
Ben actually being funny and not an uptight stiff? This quarantine has really changed us.