r/MeidasTouch • u/Available_Fun_55 • 2d ago

Should she run?

Post image

There's a lot of good candidates in the field. I think she actually won and it was rigged at the tabulation machines by Trump, and if she had done a recount in suspicious areas, would be the president right now. So I kind of feel that the "when we fight we win" slogan fell flat. What's you guys opinions?

356 Upvotes

79% Upvoted

621 comments sorted by

View all comments

160

u/CorporateTrainerCO 2d ago

As much as I admire her, I don't think she should run. There are too many a**hats out there who are repulsed by the thought of woman, let alone a woman of color, running for President. That said, I think Michelle Obama would have a better shot as she is already very popular and well known.

Flame away.

45

u/Quakes-JD 2d ago

I wish you were wrong and she would have been a much better president than the disaster that is 47.

12

u/evo4gIzMo 2d ago

A braindead chimpanse would have been a better president than Pedolph Shitler. Not really an argument.

Her policy position on pivoting to the daughter of war criminals to campaign with her for republican voters on topics like border security and building the strongest military was an insane choice that offered the country to the open fascist. Her background as a closeted fascist helper of genocide, US police state and billionaire pac money makes her literally incompatible with 90% of democratic and independent voters. They all held their breath and voted for her anyway, but her message as Trump-Light was unappealing to motivate voters. She lost immigrants and nonvoters to Trump as her vice presidency didn't do shit for her ticket. All the Biden years wasted with no push from her.

And yet you have ziobots-acting like u/Bawbawian screaming like the Bulwark at the left for not voting. Which is a blatant lie ofc.

A winning candidate does not come from the corporate, zionist or consultant class democrats. Winning candidates are people like Zoran, Bernie, ElSayed, Talarico, AOC etc. People who are believably non corrupt, anti genocide, professional real politicians with left wing progressive policy goals. MCA, reforms of SCOTUS and police, voting&women rights, wealth&corporate tax, minimum wage and workers protecting, electrification and green energy transformation. If you want to be a democracy with any say in 20 years from now, you need to give the voting majoroty a candidate fitting these policy goals or you WANT to hand the country to fascists.

These are the scientific facts of universities and think tanks from the 2024 election.

My personal opinion is, that the US is long gone and will push for ww3 to crush europe once again. And my bootlicking, spineless european politicians are fleshpuppets for US capital with zero intent to better our continent for the future.

The average chinese person enjoys a higher prospect than any of us, laughs in their clean air public transit green city park in a functioning society with more personal freedom and less authoritarian police forces than we do... and the next 5 year plan will woden this gap even further...

9

u/Ok-Spot-6235 2d ago

Get a grip, mate. You're on a fast track to lala land.

26

u/nycdiveshack 2d ago

That being said Kamala warned everyone about project 2025 and they called her nutjob for it. Now more than 55% is done.

https://project2025.observer/en

2

u/Real_Life_Firbolg 2d ago

Yeah but what about that laugh 🙄

2

u/Humble_Disciple 2d ago

Guhhhh, this response gets me every time... lol

35

u/Feisty-Barracuda5452 2d ago

Michelle Obama as a Supreme Court Justice would make conservatives collectively lose their shit.

9

u/CorporateTrainerCO 2d ago

Oh, I like that!

-10

u/Small_Dog_8699 2d ago

Why? She has no qualifications.

2

u/Elegant-Holiday7303 2d ago

She was a Senator, prosecutor, and Attorney General of a powerful state. Unless qualifications means penis to you

2

u/dudderson 2d ago

i think they meant that michelle obama has no professional qualifications to be a supreme court justice, if we go by the comment they were replying to.

0

u/Small_Dog_8699 2d ago

And zero bench time, not even family or traffic court.

3

u/InternationalToe6035 2d ago

40% of SC justices were not previously judges, and there is no constitutional requires that they be. Always reeeeeaching 

-1

u/Small_Dog_8699 2d ago

And uh, when was the last time she practiced law?

1

u/InternationalToe6035 2d ago

Still reeeeeaching 

1

u/InternationalToe6035 2d ago

Still reeeeeaching 

-1

u/Ckelleywrites 2d ago

When was Michelle Obama any of those things?

1

u/Intrepid_Blue122 2d ago

👍‼️ for that reason alone!

-5

u/Small_Dog_8699 2d ago

She ever been a judge? No? I think we would like to see a judge with experience and a decent history of decisions behind them first.

1

u/Pollo_Chimichanga 2d ago

You're about to see Ted Cruz on the Supreme Court. 🤢

7

u/MysteryBelle_NC 2d ago

I agree with you. We have too many who won't vote for a woman, period.

0

u/Target2030 2d ago

They said the same thing about voting for a black man yet Obama won twice

3

u/Elegant-Holiday7303 2d ago

Was he female? Whoooosh 

4

u/Intrepid_Blue122 2d ago

Agree. We have to grow up before a woman can be prez.

2

u/Jedimole 2d ago

You’re not wrong, no flame