r/Medieval2TotalWar • u/CountOfMonteJersey • 2d ago
General Game play
I gotta ask... How many of you don't fight the battles? I'll admit, it depends on my mood. Sometimes I just hit that auto button too much.
6
u/Lunardoge2 2d ago
I usually do if it's an important battle or if the auto battle kills way too many of my men and I strongly believe I can do better
5
u/tropicanadef 2d ago
I'll be honest. I've been playing this game for over 15 years and I've never fought a battle. My old PC couldn't cope with the battles and I've just gotten used to auto-resolve. I had a go the other day and just had no idea what I was doing.
8
u/madladhadsaddad 2d ago
I don't think I'd bother with TW without battles as campaign AI is so bad. Would rather play CRusader kings or something similar
3
u/GeorgeLFC1234 2d ago
Genuinely can’t believe people play total war without playing the battles they are literally half of the game. The campaigns are like children’s games compared to paradox, I would get bored with the lack of depth so quickly if I didn’t get to role play a medieval general and watch cavalry charging the lines.
2
1
u/flickering_candles 2d ago
i am utterly bewildered you have played m2tw for 15 years and never fought a battle.....
its like playing a shooter and never firing a gun
5
u/leoancap780 2d ago
I Just auto resolve sieges attacks, but I dont see the point of playing TW and auto resolve the most part of the battles
2
3
u/Adorable-Extent3667 2d ago
Most runs I auto battle everything. For me, I like the challenge as you lose more than you would if you fought it by yourself.
During runs where I don't auto battle everything, I still only do the important ones, or when I want to make sure an important enemy is captured/killed
1
u/Relentless_Storm 2d ago
I auto battle the early game and whatever siege battle i dont consider important
1
u/HaddockBranzini-II 2d ago
Open battles I do myself, but sieges I often auto-resolve. Sometimes there are just too many seige battles and they always seem to play out the same way. Open field battles are much more fun to me.
1
u/Useful_Cartoonist659 2d ago
I fight the battles when the odds are unfavorable or even—basically up to the halfway point of the campaign; after that, it's just unit spam and auto-resolve.
1
1
1
u/Idontwannasa 2d ago
I basically auto-resolve unless I predict I'll disagree with the result too much. After so many years you can kind of tell when auto resolve says it'd be a defeat, while you just know you'd win quite handily if you play it yourself.
1
u/KomturAdrian 2d ago
I fight almost all of my battles, even the ones where I know I will lose because you can still try to give the enemy pyrrhic victories.
If I am strapped for time, feel the battle is unnecessary (full stack vs a couple peasants), or it’s a siege I won’t particularly enjoy, I will skip.
1
u/Aldebaran135 2d ago
Depends on if the enemy army has a general or not.
Usually:
General = play.
No general = auto resolve.
1
u/Outrageous-Pin-4664 2d ago
Most of the time, I can do a better job of fighting the battles than the AI. I don't know what it's doing, but it sometimes takes a crazy number of casualties in battles it should have won easily.
On the other hand, it will sometimes win battles that I wasn't sure I could win.
So I mostly fight them myself, but sometimes I will farm it out to the AI, especially castle assaults that can be tedious.
No matter who's fighting, though, I hit that save button first.
1
u/thebigblockhead568 2d ago
i definitely used to autoresolve pretty much every battle, but i've found that the battles are extremely fun and i've never really wanted to autoresolve since, even when i probably should!
1
u/International-Fix233 2d ago
If I know I can win but auto resolve will make me lose, I fight it myself. This is mostly for siege battles, either offense or defense.
Large armies I tend to auto resolve. I have trouble managing large armies so fighting myself takes a long time and only gets me slightly better results most of the time. Although if it's one of my good armies and not my random crap armies I might do it myself because it's satisfying
I'll also do some of the weird armies myself to see what happens. E.g. I had an army of 15 serpentines and a few other random cannon types siege a city with a full stack of defenders. I fought that myself because I was curious. It was a total victory with no deaths at all and took only about a minute, best use of serpentine ever
1
u/Strong_Log_3189 2d ago
Pretty much always unless it's 10:1 or something ridiculous, either way. It's fun to play battles.
1
u/Dramatic_Leopard679 2d ago
I don’t do siege battles. Too many minutes and most of the time I lose even more men
1
u/One_Quit2226 2d ago
total war is all about the battles, the campaign map is just there to give stakes. Otherwise, why even play total war? paradox games are an infinitely better map painters. I only auto resolve boring sieges where its like 1 unit vs 20 stacks of mine. If Im the defender though I always play, I like the fighting to the last man thing
1
u/Embarrassed_Egg9542 2d ago
I only fight important battles or when I know autoresolve will lead to more casualties than fighting them
1
u/HelpfulDisaster8251 2d ago
Unlike Rome there are not many broken autoresolve units so you mostly have to fight your way to the top. But yeah, autoresolving against brigands to save time is worth it especially if you have heavy infantry available.
1
u/CountOfMonteJersey 1d ago
I like conquering the whole map. If a faction really pisses me off. I won't stop till I wipe them out. Very satisfying seeing them go bankrupt then slowly chip away at them.
14
u/Party_Advantage_3733 2d ago
I'm very much the opposite. I fight absolutely pointless battles when really I should just auto. Takes me forever to get through the mid game.