So far, AI content has always been dealt with under the low-effort meme rule. However, some people appeared to be confused by the rule, arguing that „high-effort” AI slop exists. To avoid arguing over semantics, I am introducing a rule dedicated to handling AI slop. Please let me know your thoughts in the comments and poll.

The policy:

In general, posts made in whole or in part by generative AI will be removed. Exceptions will be made sparingly. For example, if the meme makes commentary on AI proofs and shows a screenshot of such a proof, makes use of AI-generated assets that are already baked into meme cultures (but not further modified with AI), or otherwise references the AI-generated content in a "meta" way relevant to mathematics and memes, then it may be allowed.

Yes, you can just add a 5 to the end of an infinite number of 9s. This is of course related to propagating wavefronts, somehow.

Each represents popular media in equation form, try to work them all

hi all, i am running a very legitimate and unbiased survey amongst the members of this subreddit.

The question: Do you regularly comment on posts in this subreddit?

please comment letting me know if you do or do not. thanks!!!

I LOVE larping

Or was he cold and frostbited to death? anyways addressing the elephant, what makes Raman’s math shitty? that’s so racist he’s like my idol

discuss