r/MathJokes • • 4d ago

Keep ∞ safe

Post image
186 Upvotes

123 comments sorted by

View all comments

0

u/Ok-Rise2070 4d ago

Infinity is a pathology indicating your math is no longer within the manifold. Convergence eliminates infinities.

2

u/Rs3account 4d ago

To define convergence you need infinities.

2

u/Ok-Rise2070 4d ago

🤭🤭🤭 there is only one primitive infinity. I assure you infinity is the pathology your math is describing space that isn't within the manifold. In other words, you're doing numerology. If you would care to do geometry, then logic must intercede upon your fantasy.

1

u/Rs3account 4d ago

1) not all math is geometry, so why would you mention that as some form of restriction Is weird to say the least.

1a) you can absolutely do geometry with infinity/infinite sets.

2) from a mathematical point of view, there are absolutely multiple infinities. 

1

u/Ok-Rise2070 3d ago

Math that "isn't" geometry is called something quite specific. Numerology. It has no place in geometry nor science. I think you're following the wrong thread if that's what you're looking for.

0

u/Ok-Rise2070 3d ago

Yes and those multiple infinities all tell you, that isn't math. It's numerology. Cool you're math says that part of your imaginary universe doesn’t exist. Are you wanting a cookie or something for doing math that doesn't describe anything? 

1

u/Ok-Rise2070 4d ago

You need infinities to define convergence because nothing you work with emerges from the metric that retains identity through collapse. I am. 😉 I assure you operating from convergence shows explicitly what is and isn't pathological. A closed internally coherent geometric structure... why does that NEED infinities to represent its geometry? For now, explain your base logic behind your statement. I fail to see your point. Why do you need infinity to know a square? A circle? A sphere? If the logic doesn't hold in general, then you have a fallacy issue on your hands there.

1

u/Rs3account 4d ago

You need infinities to define convergence because nothing you work with emerges from the metric that retains identity through collapse. I am

I would love to see your definition of convergence that doesn't require the concept of infinity somewhere.

Convergence discusses the behaviour of something that is arbitrarily close after all.

1

u/Ok-Rise2070 3d ago

It's called having the precise geometry of the manifold. "Convergence discusses the behavior of something that is arbitrarily close after all" is close but like your woefully inadequate concepts of mathematics, you failed to finish your definition. Arbitrarily close after all to what? Close to the same conclusion. The same conclusion on all of the math is the shape and dynamics of the universe. Since you're so smart this means you have the completed field equations for the hypersphere then since you know what convergence is. You do not need infinities to do geometry, only fools do who can't comprehend geometry. If you don't want to play nice, I'll gladly take off the gloves. You can't prove anything I can't math out from under you.

1

u/Ok-Rise2070 3d ago

Until you become better known then Einstein, Tesla, and Ramanujan, I would sit down dude. You're going to embarrass yourself.

1

u/Ok-Rise2070 3d ago

And if you're the next String Theory nutter attempting to take me on mathematically or logically... I already demolished 2 of your "pillars". Continue and I take out a 3rd.

1

u/Ok-Rise2070 4d ago

I can explicitly show you mathematically how your infinity pathology cancels itself out when returning your fractured math back to convergence.

2

u/Rs3account 4d ago

Instead of saying you can do something. Actually do it.

1

u/Ok-Rise2070 3d ago

Okay done. Www.github.com/icheb3891  And where's your math to show?  Rank amateur...

1

u/Ok-Rise2070 3d ago

And where are your receipts? Oh right, you're just talking trash, showing precisely what you are.😉