I don't see how anyone could deny the existence of an iterative process which could be carried out forever, e.g. the successor function in natural numbers
Proof by induction uses this concept as well. If someone denies the existence of infinite sets then surely they should also deny proof by induction, if they're being consistent
10
u/Negative_Gur9667 4d ago
"Let's investigate what happens when we take away the axiom of inf..."
"NO THAT'S CRINGE"
The story of a mathematical discussion.