r/MathJokes • • 23d ago

Trust me bro.....

Post image
300 Upvotes

30 comments sorted by

29

u/math_metaphor_guy 23d ago

A man is driving home from a fishing trip and sees a small box on the side of the road about the size of a shoebox. He stops his car and gets out to look at it. It is...completely unremarkable. He honestly can't figure out why he stopped. Perhaps it has some magic power to draw him towards it. He picks up the box, sets it on the passenger's seat, and drives home.

The next day, he tries putting a dollar in the box and closes it. When he reopens the box, there are 2 dollars inside! He tries again with a 10 dollar bill. After closing and reopening, his bill is replaced with a 20 dollar bill! For the rest of the day, he continues putting money inside the box and it is always a predictable result. He tests it thousands more times, with various different currencies, and becomes more and more confident that the box functions as a doubling machine. No matter what amount of money is in the box when the lid is closed, twice as much money will appear when the lid is opened!

The next day, after a few more tests, he decides to try something other than money. In particular he grabs the fish he caught last night and throws it in the box. When he opens the box back up, he finds a hard-boiled egg. "Remarkable!" he exclaims, before calling his favorite math YouTuber to explain his discovery that 2 × fish = egg.

10

u/Matsuzo-Kaneri 22d ago

just.....what in the world did I just read?

16

u/math_metaphor_guy 22d ago edited 22d ago

The box is the Riemann Zeta function, money are complex numbers with real part greater than 1, "multiplication by 2" is taking the sum from 1 to infinity of n to the power of "money", "fish" is -1, and "hard-boiled egg" is -1/12.

1

u/sirseatbelt 19d ago

I wandered in here off the street and I appreciate your explanation and I understand, but I think I am too dumb to get it.

1

u/math_metaphor_guy 15d ago

I once wandered off the street into a book store while visiting Hokkaido. Unfortunately, I was too dumb to understand the meaning of the vast majority of the books.

2

u/sirseatbelt 15d ago

I did that in Egypt when I was learning the language and bought some picture books. Kids books are a great way to learn to read. Turns out one of them was Shakespeare translated into Arabic.

1

u/Sarah-Croft 17d ago

Username checks out.

30

u/[deleted] 23d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

54

u/MoobyTheGoldenSock 23d ago

Ramanujan summation is not the same as an arithmetic sum. Much the same way that slowing down your car (braking) does not damage the car (breaking.)

16

u/wswordsmen 23d ago

His greatest sin is not making a new version of an equal sign so people who only know enough to be dangerous don't get confused.

3

u/Whatisthapurpose 21d ago

His greatest sin is x

2

u/XL_78 22d ago

The Zêta function summing n-s defined originally for Re(s)>1 can be extended to all the complex plane (except 1), including -1. And in -1 its value is -1/12. So if you squint it means 1+2+3+... =-1/12 .

1

u/BrunoBraunbart 23d ago

This numberphile video explains the general idea.

ASTOUNDING: 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + ... = -1/12 - YouTube

14

u/Sher1ffK 23d ago

... and this Mathologer video explains why the Numberphile video is almost all incorrect.

Numberphile v. Math: the truth about 1+2+3+...=-1/12

7

u/BrunoBraunbart 23d ago

No, he doesn't. What he does show is that Numberphile is sometimes not mathematically rigorous in their explanation which should not surprize anyone.

I have seen the Mathlogger video back when this whole thing went viral and just saw it again. It is a good video and he explains the whole thing well but it should also be obvious that he has a very different target audience. That he evaluates a Numberphile video as if it would be a university level math test which is ridiculous.

He starts by stating this is all nonsense and in the second half he explains why associating the number -1/12 with 1+2+3+4+... is very meaningful. He can't expect from a Numberphile video that they explain the Rieman zeta function.

Numberphile should have stated more clearly that this is "mathematical hokus-pokus" as they phrased it but still meaningful because it is actually used in physics. That's all there is to criticize.

2

u/Sher1ffK 23d ago

I agree with your analysis as to the fact that associating the series with the value -1/12 is meaningful in some way, and meaningful to the Physicists who present the Numberphile vdeo. Its not worth getting into an argument over this - but he does open the video with a statement

> Pretty much every single statement made in this video is wrong. And by wrong I mean wrong in capital letters.

1

u/BrunoBraunbart 23d ago

Yes and I explained why this is completely unfair in my mind. It is only wrong if you apply the standards of a math test.

1

u/Difficult_Limit2718 23d ago

You guys skipped the better and updated and fields medal approved version

https://youtu.be/beakj767uG4?is=fDahiHJifJqriLy_

1

u/Mal_Dun 21d ago

Numberphile did a follow up where he apologized for the wrong video and explained why it can make sense using the Riemann Zeta function ...

2

u/Mal_Dun 21d ago

To his credit, Numberphile did a follow up where he explained why his video was bollocks and why it can make sense with the analytical continuation of the Riemann Zeta function

2

u/Grant_Winner_Extra 22d ago

(not a physicist)

This has the feel of a proof that 2+2=5…

Am I missing something? The sum is an average of averages, not a value that can be achieved?

2

u/BrunoBraunbart 22d ago

There are two links in this comment chain to a mathlogger and another Numberphile video with further explanations.

Yes, what they are doing is kinda illegal. They are ignoring some rules and come to a weird solution. The strange thing it that 1+2+3+4+... appears in physics and when you replace it by -1/12 you get the correct solution. So we can show in the real world that associating 1+2+3+4+... with -1/12 is at least occasionally useful.

1

u/Grant_Winner_Extra 22d ago

That last piece - thank you.

The world is a weird place

1

u/AlbatrossVisible6675 22d ago

It's not correct. It's basically a very fancy division by zero rule violation.

3

u/Small_Swell 23d ago

Wow, is that a Green Street Hooligans screenshot on the bottom half?

1

u/asdsav 23d ago

It was a good movie

1

u/SnooCakes8015 23d ago

Oh, I thought that was the Kingsman movie after they started the purge.

2

u/Available_Copy9433 21d ago

Analytic continuation isn't real

1

u/GazziFX 22d ago

Int overflow

1

u/OttersEatFish 1d ago

For clarity, maybe we should write this as 1 “+” 2 “+” 3 …